What is the `Cacheable` type class about?
```haskell
class Eq a => Cacheable a where
unchanged :: Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
default unchanged :: (Generic a, GCacheable (Rep a)) => Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
unchanged accesses a b = gunchanged (from a) (from b) accesses
```
Its only method is an alternative to `(==)`. The added value of `unchanged` (and the additional `Accesses` argument) arises _only_ for one type, namely `Dependency`. Indeed, the `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance is non-trivial, whereas every other `Cacheable` instance is completely boilerplate (and indeed either generated from `Generic`, or simply `unchanged _ = (==)`). The `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance is the only one where the `Accesses` argument is not just passed onwards.
The only callsite of the `unchanged` method is in the `ArrowCache (Rule m)` method. That is to say that the `Cacheable` type class is used to decide when we can re-use parts of the schema cache between Metadata operations.
So what is the `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance about? Normally, the output of a `Rule m a b` is re-used when the new input (of type `a`) is equal to the old one. But sometimes, that's too coarse: it might be that a certain `Rule m a b` only depends on a small part of its input of type `a`. A `Dependency` allows us to spell out what parts of `a` are being depended on, and these parts are recorded as values of types `Access a` in the state `Accesses`.
If the input `a` changes, but not in a way that touches the recorded `Accesses`, then the output `b` of that rule can be re-used without recomputing.
So now you understand _why_ we're passing `Accesses` to the `unchanged` method: `unchanged` is an equality check in disguise that just needs some additional context.
But we don't need to pass `Accesses` as a function argument. We can use the `reflection` package to pass it as type-level context. So the core of this PR is that we change the instance declaration from
```haskell
instance (Cacheable a) => Cacheable (Dependency a) where
```
to
```haskell
instance (Given Accesses, Eq a) => Eq (Dependency a) where
```
and use `(==)` instead of `unchanged`.
If you haven't seen `reflection` before: it's like a `MonadReader`, but it doesn't require a `Monad`.
In order to pass the current `Accesses` value, instead of simply passing the `Accesses` as a function argument, we need to instantiate the `Given Accesses` context. We use the `give` method from the `reflection` package for that.
```haskell
give :: forall r. Accesses -> (Given Accesses => r) -> r
unchanged :: (Given Accesses => Eq a) => Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
unchanged accesses a b = give accesses (a == b)
```
With these three components in place, we can delete the `Cacheable` type class entirely.
The remainder of this PR is just to remove the `Cacheable` type class and its instances.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6877
GitOrigin-RevId: 7125f5e11d856e7672ab810a23d5bf5ad176e77f
- Avoid a few banana brackets `(| ... |)`, often by just using local `let` bindings
- Use proper `Arrows` syntax rather than helpers like `>->`
- Use monadic `do` syntax instead of `Arrows` syntax where possible
- Avoid `traverseA @Maybe`, in favor of a `case`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6751
GitOrigin-RevId: c07b22a1a259db6d135486ec71a716705e280717
`CollectedInfo` was just an awkward sum type. By using an explicit `Either` instead, we can guarantee at the type level that certain methods only write inconsistencies, or only write dependencies. This is useful, because if we can guarantee that no dependencies are written, then we don't need to run `resolveDependencies` on that part of the Metadata. In other words, we can keep it out of `BuildOutputs`, which greatly benefits performance - see e.g. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#6613.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6765
GitOrigin-RevId: 9ce099d2eee2278dbb6e5bea72063e4b6e064b35
A bunch of configurations are retrieved from the Metadata, then stored in the `BuildOutputs` structure, only to then be forwarded to the `SchemaCache`, with extremely little processing in between.
So this simplifies the build pipeline for some parts of the metadata: just construct those things from `Metadata` directly, and store them in the `SchemaCache` without any intermediate container.
Why did we have the detour via `BuildOutputs` in the first place? Parts of the Metadata (codified by `MetadataObjId`) can generate _metadata inconsistencies_ and/or _schema dependencies_, which are related.
- Metadata inconsistencies are warnings that we show to the user, indicating that there's something wrong with their configuration, and they have to fix it.
- Schema dependencies are an internal mechanism that allow us to build a consistent view of the world. For instance, if we have a relationship from DB tables `books` to `authors`, but the `authors` table is inconsistent (e.g. it doesn't exist in the DB), then we have schema dependencies indicating that. The job of `resolveDependencies` is to then drop the relationship, so that we can at least generate a legal GraphQL schema for `books`.
If we never generate a schema dependency for a certain fragment of Metadata, then there is no reason to call `resolveDependencies` on it, and so there is no reason to store it in `BuildOutputs`.
---
The starting point that allows this refactor is to apply Metadata defaults before it reaches `buildAndCollectInfo`, so that metadata-with-defaults can be used elsewhere.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6609
GitOrigin-RevId: df0c4a7ff9451e10e02a40bf26304b26584ba483
The main aim of the PR is:
1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package.
2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it.
## Notes to the reviewer
Why a PR with large-ish diff?
1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section.
1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process.
## Changes in the PR
### Module structure
Sets up the module structure as follows:
```
Hasura/
RemoteSchema/
Metadata/
Types.hs
SchemaCache/
Types.hs
Permission.hs
RemoteRelationship.hs
Build.hs
MetadataAPI/
Types.hs
Execute.hs
```
### 1. Types representing metadata are moved
Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`.
- This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as
`Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass.
- The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship
definition.
### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved
Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`.
Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at.
Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components.
This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in.
While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal.
This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase.
### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved
The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively.
## Open questions:
1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L55)) and [2](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L91)), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s.
Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further.
1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type:
```haskell
buildRemoteSchemas ::
( ArrowChoice arr,
Inc.ArrowDistribute arr,
ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr,
Inc.ArrowCache m arr,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition,
ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition,
MonadError QErr m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles),
[RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition]
)
`arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject)
```
Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as
```haskell
data CollectedInfo
= CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata
| CIDependency
MetadataObject
-- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies
SchemaObjId
SchemaDependency
deriving (Eq)
```
this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, ....
How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine?
1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature:
```haskell
buildSchemaCacheFor ::
(QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) =>
MetadataObjId ->
MetadataModifier ->
```
This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint):
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
CacheRWM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MetadataM m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m EncJSON
```
This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed.
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m,
MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId
```
The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call
`buildSchemaCacheFor`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291
GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
## Description
This PR removes `RQL.Types`, which was now only re-exporting a bunch of unrelated modules.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4363
GitOrigin-RevId: 894f29a19bff70b3dad8abc5d9858434d5065417
### Description
Small PR that moves code out of `RQL.Types.hs`. Specifically, it moves `HasServerConfigCtx` to where `ServerConfigCtx` is defined. This removes code from `RQL.Types`, makes the dependency on `Server.Types` more explicit, and will make some further cleanups easier.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4336
GitOrigin-RevId: 95bb3467d741763892c4e68a38760497157ba1aa
### Description
This small PR improves the representation of an endpoint method from `Text` to an enum of the supported methods. Additionally, it cleans some of the instances defined on surrounding types (such as Postgres-specific instances on Endpoint types).
Due to a name conflict, this makes `RQL.Types.Endpoint` impossible to re-export from `RQL.Types`, which in turn forces several other modules to import it explicitly, which I think is fine since we want to ultimately get rid of `RQL.Types`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3965
GitOrigin-RevId: 33869007d0d818ddf486fb61d1f6099f9dad7570
TL;DR
---
We go from this:
```haskell
(|
withRecordInconsistency
( (|
modifyErrA
( do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEitherA -< buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependencies -< (metadataObject, schemaObject, dependencies)
returnA -< info
)
|) (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext)
)
|) metadataObject
```
to this:
```haskell
withRecordInconsistencyM metadataObject $ do
modifyErr (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext) $ do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEither $ buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependenciesM metadataObject schemaObject dependencies
return info
```
Background
---
We use Haskell's `Arrows` language extension to gain some syntactic sugar when working with `Arrow`s. `Arrow`s are a programming abstraction comparable to `Monad`s.
Unfortunately the syntactic sugar provided by this language extension is not very sweet.
This PR shows how we can sometimes avoid using `Arrow`s altogether, without loss of functionality or correctness. It is a demo of a technique that can be used to cut down the amount of `Arrows`-based code in our codebase by about half.
Approach
---
Although _in general_ not every `Monad` is an `Arrow`, specific `Arrow` instantiations are exactly as powerful as their `Monad` equivalents. Otherwise they wouldn't be very equivalent, would they?
Just like `liftEither` interprets the `Either e` monad into an arbitrary monad implementing `MonadError e`, we add `interpA` which interprets certain concrete monads such as `Writer w` into specific arrows, e.g. ones satisfying `ArrowWriter w`. This means that the part of the code that only uses such interpretable effects can be written _monadically_, and then used in _arrow_ constructions down the line.
This approach cannot be used for arrow effects which do not have a monadic equivalent. In our codebase, the only instance of this is `ArrowCache m`, implemented by the `Rule m` arrow. So code written with `ArrowCache m` in the context cannot be rewritten monadically using this technique.
See also
---
- #1827
- #2210
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3543
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: eb79619c95f7a571bce99bc144ce42ee65d08505
spec: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2278
Briefly:
- extend metadata so that allowlist entries get a new scope field
- update `add_collection_to_allowlist` to accept this new scope field,
and adds `update_scope_of_collection_in_allowlist` to change the scope
- scope can be global or role-based; a collection is available for every
role if it is global, and available to every listed role if it is role-based
- graphql-engine-oss is aware of role-based allowlist metadata; collections
with non-global scope are treated as if they weren't in the allowlist
To run the tests:
- `cabal run graphql-engine-tests -- unit --match Allowlist`
- py-tests against pro:
- launch `graphql-engine-pro` with `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ADMIN_SECRET` and `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ENABLE_ALLOWLIST`
- `pytest test_allowlist_queries.py --hge-urls=... --pg-urls=... --hge-key=... --test-allowlist-queries --pro-tests`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2477
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 01f8026fbe59d8701e2de30986511a452fce1a99
We'll see if this improves compile times at all, but I think it's worth
doing as at least the most minimal form of module documentation.
This was accomplished by first compiling everything with
-ddump-minimal-imports, and then a bunch of scripting (with help from
ormolu)
**EDIT** it doesn't seem to improve CI compile times but the noise floor is high as it looks like we're not caching library dependencies anymore
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2730
GitOrigin-RevId: 667eb8de1e0f1af70420cbec90402922b8b84cb4
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.
For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.
$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^ # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404
GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
fixes#3868
docker image - `hasura/graphql-engine:inherited-roles-preview-48b73a2de`
Note:
To be able to use the inherited roles feature, the graphql-engine should be started with the env variable `HASURA_GRAPHQL_EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES` set to `inherited_roles`.
Introduction
------------
This PR implements the idea of multiple roles as presented in this [paper](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/FGALanguageICDE07.pdf). The multiple roles feature in this PR can be used via inherited roles. An inherited role is a role which can be created by combining multiple singular roles. For example, if there are two roles `author` and `editor` configured in the graphql-engine, then we can create a inherited role with the name of `combined_author_editor` role which will combine the select permissions of the `author` and `editor` roles and then make GraphQL queries using the `combined_author_editor`.
How are select permissions of different roles are combined?
------------------------------------------------------------
A select permission includes 5 things:
1. Columns accessible to the role
2. Row selection filter
3. Limit
4. Allow aggregation
5. Scalar computed fields accessible to the role
Suppose there are two roles, `role1` gives access to the `address` column with row filter `P1` and `role2` gives access to both the `address` and the `phone` column with row filter `P2` and we create a new role `combined_roles` which combines `role1` and `role2`.
Let's say the following GraphQL query is queried with the `combined_roles` role.
```graphql
query {
employees {
address
phone
}
}
```
This will translate to the following SQL query:
```sql
select
(case when (P1 or P2) then address else null end) as address,
(case when P2 then phone else null end) as phone
from employee
where (P1 or P2)
```
The other parameters of the select permission will be combined in the following manner:
1. Limit - Minimum of the limits will be the limit of the inherited role
2. Allow aggregations - If any of the role allows aggregation, then the inherited role will allow aggregation
3. Scalar computed fields - same as table column fields, as in the above example
APIs for inherited roles:
----------------------
1. `add_inherited_role`
`add_inherited_role` is the [metadata API](https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/core/api-reference/index.html#schema-metadata-api) to create a new inherited role. It accepts two arguments
`role_name`: the name of the inherited role to be added (String)
`role_set`: list of roles that need to be combined (Array of Strings)
Example:
```json
{
"type": "add_inherited_role",
"args": {
"role_name":"combined_user",
"role_set":[
"user",
"user1"
]
}
}
```
After adding the inherited role, the inherited role can be used like single roles like earlier
Note:
An inherited role can only be created with non-inherited/singular roles.
2. `drop_inherited_role`
The `drop_inherited_role` API accepts the name of the inherited role and drops it from the metadata. It accepts a single argument:
`role_name`: name of the inherited role to be dropped
Example:
```json
{
"type": "drop_inherited_role",
"args": {
"role_name":"combined_user"
}
}
```
Metadata
---------
The derived roles metadata will be included under the `experimental_features` key while exporting the metadata.
```json
{
"experimental_features": {
"derived_roles": [
{
"role_name": "manager_is_employee_too",
"role_set": [
"employee",
"manager"
]
}
]
}
}
```
Scope
------
Only postgres queries and subscriptions are supported in this PR.
Important points:
-----------------
1. All columns exposed to an inherited role will be marked as `nullable`, this is done so that cell value nullification can be done.
TODOs
-------
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Test a GraphQL query running with a inherited role without enabling inherited roles in experimental features
- [] Tests for aggregate queries, limit, computed fields, functions, subscriptions (?)
- [ ] Introspection test with a inherited role (nullability changes in a inherited role)
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Changelog
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 3b8ee1e11f5ceca80fe294f8c074d42fbccfec63
The metadata storage implementation for graphql-engine-multitenant.
- It uses a centralized PG database to store metadata of all tenants (instead of per tenant database)
- Similarly, it uses a single schema-sync listener thread per MT worker (instead of listener thread per tenant) (PS: although, the processor thread is spawned per tenant)
- 2 new flags are introduced - `--metadataDatabaseUrl` and (optional) `--metadataDatabaseRetries`
Internally, a "metadata mode" is introduced to indicate an external/managed store vs a store managed by each pro-server.
To run :
- obtain the schema file (located at `pro/server/res/cloud/metadata_db_schema.sql`)
- apply the schema on a PG database
- set the `--metadataDatabaseUrl` flag to point to the above database
- run the MT executable
The schema (and its migrations) for the metadata db is managed outside the MT worker.
### New metadata
The following is the new portion of `Metadata` added :
```yaml
version: 3
metrics_config:
analyze_query_variables: true
analyze_response_body: false
api_limits:
disabled: false
depth_limit:
global: 5
per_role:
user: 7
editor: 9
rate_limit:
per_role:
user:
unique_params:
- x-hasura-user-id
- x-hasura-team-id
max_reqs_per_min: 20
global:
unique_params: IP
max_reqs_per_min: 10
```
- In Pro, the code around fetching/updating/syncing pro-config is removed
- That also means, `hdb_pro_catalog` for keeping the config cache is not required. Hence the `hdb_pro_catalog` is also removed
- The required config comes from metadata / schema cache
### New Metadata APIs
- `set_api_limits`
- `remove_api_limits`
- `set_metrics_config`
- `remove_metrics_config`
#### `set_api_limits`
```yaml
type: set_api_limits
args:
disabled: false
depth_limit:
global: 5
per_role:
user: 7
editor: 9
rate_limit:
per_role:
anonymous:
max_reqs_per_min: 10
unique_params: "ip"
editor:
max_reqs_per_min: 30
unique_params:
- x-hasura-user-id
user:
unique_params:
- x-hasura-user-id
- x-hasura-team-id
max_reqs_per_min: 20
global:
unique_params: IP
max_reqs_per_min: 10
```
#### `remove_api_limits`
```yaml
type: remove_api_limits
args: {}
```
#### `set_metrics_config`
```yaml
type: set_metrics_config
args:
analyze_query_variables: true
analyze_response_body: false
```
#### `remove_metrics_config`
```yaml
type: remove_metrics_config
args: {}
```
#### TODO
- [x] on-prem pro implementation for `MonadMetadataStorage`
- [x] move the project config from Lux to pro metadata (PR: #379)
- [ ] console changes for pro config/api limits, subscription workers (cc @soorajshankar @beerose)
- [x] address other minor TODOs
- [x] TxIso for `MonadSourceResolver`
- [x] enable EKG connection pool metrics
- [x] add logging of connection info when sources are added?
- [x] confirm if the `buildReason` for schema cache is correct
- [ ] testing
- [x] 1.3 -> 1.4 cloud migration script (#465; PR: #508)
- [x] one-time migration of existing metadata from users' db to centralized PG
- [x] one-time migration of pro project config + api limits + regression tests from metrics API to metadata
- [ ] integrate with infra team (WIP - cc @hgiasac)
- [x] benchmark with 1000+ tenants + each tenant making read/update metadata query every second (PR: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/411)
- [ ] benchmark with few tenants having large metadata (100+ tables etc.)
- [ ] when user moves regions (https://github.com/hasura/lux/issues/1717)
- [ ] metadata has to be migrated from one regional PG to another
- [ ] migrate metrics data as well ?
- [ ] operation logs
- [ ] regression test runs
- [ ] find a way to share the schema files with the infra team
Co-authored-by: Naveen Naidu <30195193+Naveenaidu@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 39e8361f2c0e96e0f9e8f8fb45e6cc14857f31f1
This PR generalizes a bunch of metadata structures.
Most importantly, it changes `SourceCache` to hold existentially quantified values:
```
data BackendSourceInfo =
forall b. Backend b => BackendSourceInfo (SourceInfo b)
type SourceCache = HashMap SourceName BackendSourceInfo
```
This changes a *lot* of things throughout the code. For now, all code using the schema cache explicitly casts sources to Postgres, meaning that if any non-Postgres `SourceInfo` makes it to the cache, it'll be ignored.
That means that after this PR is submitted, we can split work between two different aspects:
- creating `SourceInfo` for other backends
- handling those other sources down the line
GitOrigin-RevId: fb9ea00f32e840fc33c5467896fb1dfa5283ab42
This PR is a combination of the following other PRs:
- #169: move HasHttpManager out of RQL.Types
- #170: move UserInfoM to Hasura.Session
- #179: delete dead code from RQL.Types
- #180: move event related code to EventTrigger
GitOrigin-RevId: d97608d7945f2c7a0a37e307369983653eb62eb1
This is an incremental PR towards https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/5797
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: a6cb8c239b2ff840a0095e78845f682af0e588a9
An incremental PR towards https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/5797
- Expands `MonadMetadataStorage` with operations related to async actions and setting/updating metadata
GitOrigin-RevId: 53386b7b2d007e162050b826d0708897f0b4c8f6
This PR makes a bunch of schema generation code in Hasura.GraphQL.Schema backend-agnostic, by moving the backend-specific parts into a new BackendSchema type class. This way, the schema generation code can be reused for other backends, simply by implementing new instances of the BackendSchema type class.
This work is now in a state where the schema generators are sufficiently generic to accept the implementation of a new backend. That means that we can start exposing MS SQL schema. Execution is not implemented yet, of course.
The branch currently does not support computed fields or Relay. This is, in a sense, intentional: computed field support is normally baked into the schema generation (through the fieldSelection schema generator), and so this branch shows a programming technique that allows us to expose certain GraphQL schema depending on backend support. We can write support for computed fields and Relay at a later stage.
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <antoine@hasura.io>
GitOrigin-RevId: df369fc3d189cbda1b931d31678e9450a6601314
Add a backend type extension parameter to some RQL types, following the ideas of the paper "Trees that grow" (Najd & Jones 2016)
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <antoine@hasura.io>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
