## Description
Some of the documentation/organizational changes I was putting into the suggestions for #3624 were a bit too convoluted for GitHub's suggestion interface, so I'm putting them here instead.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3910
Co-authored-by: Solomon <24038+solomon-b@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 06e0cb08bd18e7f8b21452df0697cfd80bc56fde
### Motivation
#2338 introduced a way to validate REST queries against the metadata after a change, to properly report any inconsistency that would emerge from a change in the underlying structure of our schema. However, the way this was done was quite complex and error-prone. Namely: we would use the generated schema parsers to statically execute an introspection query, similar to the one we use for remote schemas, then parse the resulting bytestring as it were coming from a remote schema.
This led to several issues: the code was using remote schema primitives, and was associated with remote schema code, despite being unrelated, which led to absurd situations like creating fake `Variable`s whose type was also their name. A lot of the code had to deal with the fact that we might fail to re-parse our own schema. Additionally, some of it was dead code, that for some reason GHC did not warn about? But more fundamentally, this architecture decision creates a dependency between unrelated pieces of the engine: modifying the internal processing of root fields or the introspection of remote schemas now risks impacting the unrelated `OpenAPI` feature.
### Description
This PR decouples that process from the remote schema introspection logic and from the execution engine by making `Analyse` and `OpenAPI` work on the generic `G.SchemaIntrospection` instead. To accomplish this, it:
- adds `GraphQL.Parser.Schema.Convert`, to convert from our "live" schema back to a flat `SchemaIntrospection`
- persists in the schema cache the `admin` introspection generated when building the schema, and uses it both for validation and for generating the `OpenAPI`.
### Known issues and limitations
This adds a bit of memory pressure to the engine, as we persist the entire schema in the schema cache. This might be acceptable in the short-term, but we have several potential ideas going forward should this be a problem:
- cache the result of `Analyze`: when it becomes possible to build the `OpenAPI` purely with the result of `Analyze` without any additional schema information, then we could cache that instead, reducing the footprint
- caching the `OpenAPI`: if it doesn't need to change every time the endpoint is queried, then it should be possible to cache the entire `OpenAPI` object instead of the schema
- cache a copy of the `FieldParsers` used to generate the schema: as those are persisted through the GraphQL `Context`, and are the only input required to generate the `Schema`, making them accessible in the schema cache would allow us to have the exact same feature with no additional memory cost, at the price of a slightly slower and more complicated process (need to rebuild the `Schema` every time we query the OpenAPI endpoint)
- cache nothing at all, and rebuild the admin schema from scratch every time.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3962
Co-authored-by: paritosh-08 <85472423+paritosh-08@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: a8b9808170b231fdf6787983b4a9ed286cde27e0
### Description
This is it! This PR enables the Metadata API for remote relationships from remote schemas, adds tests, ~~adds documentation~~, adds an entry to the Changelog. This is the release PR that enables the feature.
### Checklist
- [ ] Tests:
- [x] RS-to-Postgres (high level)
- [x] RS-to-RS (high level)
- [x] From RS specifically (testing for edge cases)
- [x] Metadata API tests
- [ ] Unit testing the actual engine?
- [x] Changelog entry
- [ ] Documentation?
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3974
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi <4211715+scriptnull@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: c9aebf12e6eebef8d264ea831a327b968d4be9d2
### Description
This small PR improves the representation of an endpoint method from `Text` to an enum of the supported methods. Additionally, it cleans some of the instances defined on surrounding types (such as Postgres-specific instances on Endpoint types).
Due to a name conflict, this makes `RQL.Types.Endpoint` impossible to re-export from `RQL.Types`, which in turn forces several other modules to import it explicitly, which I think is fine since we want to ultimately get rid of `RQL.Types`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3965
GitOrigin-RevId: 33869007d0d818ddf486fb61d1f6099f9dad7570
…rmance
It makes sense to try to utilize multiple threads for metadata
operations since we expect them to come one at a time (and likely at
lower load periods anyway).
As noted, although we build roles in parallel now, the admin role is
still a bottleneck. For replace_metadata on huge_schema, on my machine
I get:
BEFORE: 22.7 sec
AFTER: 13.5 sec
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3911
GitOrigin-RevId: 4d4ee6ac8b5506603e70e4fc666a3aacc054d493
### Description
Several libraries define `catMaybes` as `mapMaybe id`. We had it defined in `Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended` already. This small PR also defines it in `Extended` modules for other containers and replaces every occurrence of `mapMaybe id` accordingly.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3884
GitOrigin-RevId: d222a2ca2f4eb9b725b20450a62a626d3886dbf4
TL;DR
---
We go from this:
```haskell
(|
withRecordInconsistency
( (|
modifyErrA
( do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEitherA -< buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependencies -< (metadataObject, schemaObject, dependencies)
returnA -< info
)
|) (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext)
)
|) metadataObject
```
to this:
```haskell
withRecordInconsistencyM metadataObject $ do
modifyErr (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext) $ do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEither $ buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependenciesM metadataObject schemaObject dependencies
return info
```
Background
---
We use Haskell's `Arrows` language extension to gain some syntactic sugar when working with `Arrow`s. `Arrow`s are a programming abstraction comparable to `Monad`s.
Unfortunately the syntactic sugar provided by this language extension is not very sweet.
This PR shows how we can sometimes avoid using `Arrow`s altogether, without loss of functionality or correctness. It is a demo of a technique that can be used to cut down the amount of `Arrows`-based code in our codebase by about half.
Approach
---
Although _in general_ not every `Monad` is an `Arrow`, specific `Arrow` instantiations are exactly as powerful as their `Monad` equivalents. Otherwise they wouldn't be very equivalent, would they?
Just like `liftEither` interprets the `Either e` monad into an arbitrary monad implementing `MonadError e`, we add `interpA` which interprets certain concrete monads such as `Writer w` into specific arrows, e.g. ones satisfying `ArrowWriter w`. This means that the part of the code that only uses such interpretable effects can be written _monadically_, and then used in _arrow_ constructions down the line.
This approach cannot be used for arrow effects which do not have a monadic equivalent. In our codebase, the only instance of this is `ArrowCache m`, implemented by the `Rule m` arrow. So code written with `ArrowCache m` in the context cannot be rewritten monadically using this technique.
See also
---
- #1827
- #2210
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3543
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: eb79619c95f7a571bce99bc144ce42ee65d08505
There are three minor cleanups here:
- The first argument to the `setMetadataInCatalog` method is always `Just`. It is thus important to avoid `Maybe`, because this means that a crucial piece of code (saving metadata) is completely untested.
- Rather than spelling them out, we can derive the `Semigroup`/`Monoid` instances for `MetadataModifier` through the `Endo` type.
- I've renamed the name of the getter of the `MetadataModifier` newtype to **r**unMetadataModifier. Using record puns, this allows us to write:
```diff
- putMetadata $ unMetadataModifier metadataModifier metadata
+ putMetadata $ runMetadataModifier metadata
```
which is nicer to read.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3703
GitOrigin-RevId: fd36b3c5202017f5afc943c01dfdd7c82c099bdd
We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema.
Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects.
We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e46 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type:
```haskell
tableSelectionSet ::
forall b r m n.
MonadBuildSchema b r m n =>
SourceName ->
TableInfo b ->
SelPermInfo b ->
m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b))
```
There are three reasons to change this.
1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125.
2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read.
3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068.
Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter.
One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role.
So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
spec: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2278
Briefly:
- extend metadata so that allowlist entries get a new scope field
- update `add_collection_to_allowlist` to accept this new scope field,
and adds `update_scope_of_collection_in_allowlist` to change the scope
- scope can be global or role-based; a collection is available for every
role if it is global, and available to every listed role if it is role-based
- graphql-engine-oss is aware of role-based allowlist metadata; collections
with non-global scope are treated as if they weren't in the allowlist
To run the tests:
- `cabal run graphql-engine-tests -- unit --match Allowlist`
- py-tests against pro:
- launch `graphql-engine-pro` with `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ADMIN_SECRET` and `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ENABLE_ALLOWLIST`
- `pytest test_allowlist_queries.py --hge-urls=... --pg-urls=... --hge-key=... --test-allowlist-queries --pro-tests`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2477
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 01f8026fbe59d8701e2de30986511a452fce1a99
## Description
This PR is a subset of #3069, that does roughly that #3031 was aiming to do: add the schema cache building phase for relationships from remote servers. This PR does not change any of the code that *uses* remote relationships, meaning we ignore the added schema cache information. It also contains dependency-tracking code, which was originally missing from #3031; in turn, this pulls some of the metadata API as well, since we identify remote relationships by how they were created.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3540
GitOrigin-RevId: ed962b6d07fd4adbf0a71e0d79736a4e8b422fea
## Description
This PR updates the notes-extracting script, to allow for a stable sort across runs:
- files are now treated in alphabetical order of the full file name:
- within a file, notes are treated in order
- that order is reflected in the generated index file
- within a note, references are sorted by file, then by line number
Additionally it fixes(?) a note whose format was unexpected.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3352
GitOrigin-RevId: 2b2b57ec0aa2657d75a88e4951e6b19bb2d665e3
## Description
When setting up a remote relationship to a remote schema, values coming from the left-hand side are given as _arguments_ to the targeted field of the remote schema. In turn, that means we need to adjust the arguments to that remote field; in the case of input objects, it means creating a brand new input object in which the relevant fields have been removed.
To both avoid conflicts, and be explicit, we give a pretty verbose name to such an input object: its original name, followed by "remote_rel", followed by the full name of the field (table name + relationship name). The bug there was introduced when working on extending remote relationships to other backends: we changed the code that translates the table name to a graphql identifier to be generic, and use the table's `ToTxt` instance instead. However, when a table is not in the default schema, the character used by that instance is `.`, which is not a valid GraphQL name.
This PR fixes it, by doing two things:
- it defines a safe function to translate LHS identifiers to graphql names (by replacing all invalid characters by `_`)
- it doesn't use `unsafeMkName` anymore, and checks at validation time that the type name is correct
## Further work
On this PR:
- [x] add a test
- [x] write a Changelog entry
Beyond this PR, we might want to:
- prioritize #1747
- analyze all calls to `unsafeMkName` and remove as many as possible
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3363
GitOrigin-RevId: fe98eb1d34157b2c8323af453f5c369de616af38
This PR pretty much does the same thing to remote relationship types in schemacache as what #2979 did to remote relationship types in the IR. On main remote relationships are represented by types of form `T from to`. This PR changes it to `T from` which makes it a lot more reusable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3037
GitOrigin-RevId: 90a5c9e2346c8dc2da6ec5b8c970d6c863d2afb8
## Remaining Work
- [x] changelog entry
- [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested
- [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support
- [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary
- [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~
- ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171
- [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~
- cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172
## Description
This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API.
- it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console)
- it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124)
- it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149)
Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues:
- THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because:
- `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres.
As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
## Description
This PR fixes two issues:
- in [#2903](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903), we introduced a new metadata representation of remote relationships, which broke parsing a metadata blob containing an old-style db-to-rs remote relationship
- in [#1179](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1179), we silently and mistakenly deprecated `create_remote_relationship` in favour of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 45481db7a8d42c7612e938707cd2d652c4c81bf8
