This commit introduces an "experimental" backend adapter to the GraphQL Engine.
It defines a high-level interface which will eventually be used as the basis for implementing separate data source query generation & marshaling services that communicate with the GraphQL Engine Server via some protocol.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2684
Co-authored-by: awjchen <13142944+awjchen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Parks <592078+cdparks@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 4463b682142ad6e069e223b88b14db511f634768
This PR pretty much does the same thing to remote relationship types in schemacache as what #2979 did to remote relationship types in the IR. On main remote relationships are represented by types of form `T from to`. This PR changes it to `T from` which makes it a lot more reusable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3037
GitOrigin-RevId: 90a5c9e2346c8dc2da6ec5b8c970d6c863d2afb8
this pr modifies the representation chosen for introspection parsers, "pushing down" the `Schema` input so it is not required to build the parser anymore. instead, the value produced when the parser is evaluated becomes a function that consumes a schema:
```diff
-schema :: MonadParse n => Schema -> FieldParser n ( J.Value)
+schema :: MonadParse n => FieldParser n (Schema -> J.Value)
```
this addresses points (1) and (2) of #2833 and is intended to make #2799 easier: we will need to enforce permissions when generating introspection objects, hiding fields the user is not allowed to see, so if we can pass the schema _later_, we can build this parser once, evaluate it once to (morally) obtain a function `Schema -> Value`, and simply run that single `Schema -> Value` function on different role-based schemas.
(we really need some terminology to be fixed here: "parser" is already not the best name, and then we have parser vs value/function "returned" by parser vs...)
however, we have immediate benefits: we no longer _need_ a `Schema` object to build the introspection parsers! this means we can remove the bogus "degenerate case" schema that is currently constructed in `emptyIntrospection` (and indeed we remove that binding altogether).
(fun fact: the diff for this pull request has a negative line count despite adding a lot of comments. @abooij says i have bragging rights in perpetuity now, à la @nicuveo)
changes:
- internal changes to the operation of the server, invisible outside of a small number of `GraphQL.Schema.*` modules
- no user-facing changes
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2835
Co-authored-by: Auke Booij <164426+abooij@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Simmons <210815+jberryman@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 9990f53b8f5c733424c4d71a24d94c13dee842ba
## Remaining Work
- [x] changelog entry
- [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested
- [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support
- [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary
- [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~
- ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171
- [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~
- cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172
## Description
This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API.
- it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console)
- it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124)
- it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149)
Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues:
- THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because:
- `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres.
As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
## Description
This PR fixes two issues:
- in [#2903](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903), we introduced a new metadata representation of remote relationships, which broke parsing a metadata blob containing an old-style db-to-rs remote relationship
- in [#1179](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1179), we silently and mistakenly deprecated `create_remote_relationship` in favour of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 45481db7a8d42c7612e938707cd2d652c4c81bf8
This PR simplifies the types that represent a remote relationship in IR so that they can be reused in other parts (in remote schema types) which could have remote relationships.
The comments on the PR explain the main changes.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2979
GitOrigin-RevId: 559c51d9d6ae79e2183ce4347018741b9096ac74
GraphQL types can refer to each other in a circular way. The PDV framework used to use values of type `Unique` to recognize two fragments of GraphQL schema as being the same instance. Internally, this is based on `Data.Unique` from the `base` package, which simply increases a counter on every creation of a `Unique` object.
**NB**: The `Unique` values are _not_ used for knot tying the schema combinators themselves (i.e. `Parser`s). The knot tying for `Parser`s is purely based on keys provided to `memoizeOn`. The `Unique` values are _only_ used to recognize two pieces of GraphQL _schema_ as being identical. Originally, the idea was that this would help us with a perfectly correct identification of GraphQL types. But this fully correct equality checking of GraphQL types was never implemented, and does not seem to be necessary to prevent bugs.
Specifically, these `Unique` values are stored as part of `data Definition a`, which specifies a part of our internal abstract syntax tree for the GraphQL types that we expose. The `Unique` values get initialized by the `SchemaT` effect.
In #2894 and #2895, we are experimenting with how (parts of) the GraphQL types can be hidden behind certain permission predicates. This would allow a single GraphQL schema in memory to serve all roles, implementing #2711. The permission predicates get evaluated at query parsing time when we know what role is doing a certain request, thus outputting the correct GraphQL types for that role.
If the approach of #2895 is followed, then the `Definition` objects, and thus the `Unique` values, would be hidden behind the permission predicates. Since the permission predicates are evaluated only after the schema is already supposed to be built, this means that the permission predicates would prevent us from initializing the `Unique` values, rendering them useless.
The simplest remedy to this is to remove our usage of `Unique` altogether from the GraphQL schema and schema combinators. It doesn't serve a functional purpose, doesn't prevent bugs, and requires extra bookkeeping.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2980
GitOrigin-RevId: 50d3f9e0b9fbf578ac49c8fc773ba64a94b1f43d
### Description
This PR changes the internal representation of a parsed remote schema. We were still using a list of type definitions, meaning every time we were doing a type lookup we had to iterate through a linked list! 🙀 It was very noticeable on large schemas, that need to do a lot of lookups. This PR consequently changes the internal representation to a HashMap. Building the OneGraph schema on my machine now takes **23 seconds**, compared to **367 seconds** before this patch.
Some important points:
- ~~this PR removes a check for type duplication in remote schemas; it's unclear to me whether that's something we need to add back or not~~ (no longer true)
- this PR makes it obvious that we do not distinguish between "this remote schema is missing type X" and "this remote schema expects type X to be an object, but it's a scalar"; this PR doesn't change anything about it, but adds a comment where we could surface that error (see [2991](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/2991))
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2963
GitOrigin-RevId: f5c96ad40f4e0afcf8cef635b4d64178111f98d3
