## Description
According to NDC headers pass-through spec, commands can include headers
in their responses, which are forwarded as response headers by the
engine to the client. This PR implements it.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4fe458db02c5dd51f4674e4e013312f8e179c087
I noticed a few extra calls to `.clone()` while working on an unrelated
refactor. I want to remove them for brevity and simplicity; I don't
expect a performance improvement.
This turns on the Clippy warning `redundant_clone`, which detects
unnecessary calls to `.clone()` (and `.to_string()`).
It is an unstable warning and so might reports some false positives. If
we find any, we can suppress the warning there.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a713f29cf862d6f4cb40300105c6b9f96df00676
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
When using boolean expression types on models, we have to check that any
relationships they define are local, as we currently do not support
remote predicates. This adds these checks in the `models_graphql` stage,
once we know about a) models and their sources b) boolean expressions c)
relationships.
Behind a feature flag, so strictly a no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 70b2e4b316f5b8d57fa06d5492cccdddca0aaf1c
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
A few debug lines slipped in recently, let's make `clippy` `warn` on
those, so they are kicked out by CI. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 290f6de35f9315b68811eb5f15969fb0333e9d06
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We need to run this step after the `relationships` stage, so we can
lookup object relationships when validating boolean expression
relationships.
We move aggregation checks back to `models`, as they are also used in
the `relationships` step and we don't want circular dep hell.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 20fd777b0bc68c2bffc6febb6389a1a955ab2f16
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
To check filter expression types properly, we need the resolved `source`
for all models. Previously we did not have this, as we did all model
resolving in one go. This splits that into stages, the existing `models`
resolves models and their sources, and then `models_graphql` resolves a
Model's filter expressions, aggregations and graphql schema. This means
we can inspect the model sources during the `models_graphql` in the
actual PR we want to do here.
It's massive, but it's a functional no-op, I promise.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6c8fbf0763fb1daa209a4c84855609e8e9372e8b
## Description
Aggregate response reshaping is where the computed aggregates are
extracted from the NDC response and rewritten into the response GraphQL
shape (usually a nested object structure). Previously this reshaping was
precomputed and stored in the internal IR for the request and then
passed through to the response reshaping code. At the time, this seemed
smarter than re-walking the GraphQL annotation structure and
reinterpreting it to know how to reshape the response, when we already
do this at IR-creation time.
However, this was too smart for its own good. 😭 Unfortunately, the
necessary bits of the IR are not available when processing the an
aggregate response inside a relationship field. What _is_ available is
the GraphQL annotation structure. 🤦♂️
This PR reworks the aggregate response reshaping to solely use the
GraphQL annotation structure and removes the precomputation code and
related IR storage of it. This means the new reshaping code will be
usable for the upcoming aggregate relationships implementation. And...
it turns out that the new code actually cleaner and simpler than the old
"clever" code anyway.
This PR does not change any functionality.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 59e29cdac396c094a35c1203c02a3f27ba2c4c58
## Description
This PR refactors the `output_type::object_type_fields` function, which
is a monster, and splits out the handling of relationship fields into a
separate function. This function then itself is broken down into
separate functions that each handle one of the different types of
relationship fields.
This is particularly necessary now, as logic to handle
ModelAggregateRelationshipTargets is about to get added and that would
only grow the monster function more.
The `RelationshipTarget` `metadata_resolve` type has had its enum
variant structs broken out into separate struct types so that they can
be passed around separate to the enum. This makes it easier to write
functions that deal with each enum variant separately (like
`output_type::object_type_fields`).
This PR causes no behavioural changes.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4707f8b07154bd4d503f78392a3d2d8976eab339
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
When doing relationships across bool exps, by default we use the target
model's `where` clause bool exp. However, we allow the user to provide a
different bool exp instead, which we now pay attention to.
Behind a feature flag so a user-facing no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b31157c455d56375c35db28f2418da9d41b68c46
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Previously we ignored `isNull` and `logicalOperators`. Now we obey
`isNull` for scalars, and `logicalOperators` for objects.
Both `isNull` on objects and `logicalOperators` on scalars don't exist
as features, so will create follow up tickets for these.
No new tests, but I was able to make both things fail by disabling the
appropriate options:
<img width="655" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-19 at 16 59 33"
src="https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/assets/4729125/47eb342d-49c1-4ec8-8bfa-5e3f2d286928">
<img width="758" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-19 at 16 30 08"
src="https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/assets/4729125/5722407c-e12e-429a-ab3a-fc221a8addfa">
Forgive me, I also broke up the `stages/boolean_expressions/object`
module into a few pieces to make this easier to think about.
This is behind a feature flag, no op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b1273d8a9655a21adedc7c7a04a96e0cfe98cc98
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
PR to implement filtering and sorting on nested fields in the custom
connector.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: d112ff16beabeab1aea8d2bb24f51d22b461c8cd
## Description
This PR continues on from #725 and adds the metadata resolve logic to
validate the usage of aggregates applied to relationships. The metadata
resolve logic is gated behind a new `enable_aggregate_relationships`
flag and disabled by default.
The new resolve logic lives in
`crates/metadata-resolve/src/stages/relationships/mod.rs`, however, most
of the actual logic that validates the usage of the aggregate expression
with the relationship has been reused from the model aggregate resolve
code. Subsequently, that code
(`crates/metadata-resolve/src/stages/models/aggregation.rs`) was
refactored to return a distinct error type
`ModelAggregateExpressionError` that can be composed with the
`RelationshipError` type, so the same errors can be returned with the
additional context of the relationship they were found in.
New metadata resolve error tests have been added in
`crates/metadata-resolve/tests/failing/aggregate_expression_in_relationship/*`.
Also, two new passing metadata resolve tests have been added to cover
the happy case of root field and relationship aggregate expressions:
`crates/metadata-resolve/tests/passing/aggregate_expressions/*`
JIRA: [V3ENGINE-160](https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-160)
[V3ENGINE-160]:
https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-160?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 8cd7040cc9277940641d5ac239d7b34f8c1462c5
This keeps versions in one place so we can more easily ensure we upgrade
crates together.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6a929bb6196c19a1f66a768585b669127035e9be
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We cannot validate `BooleanExpressionType`s much until they are used.
This adds checks for when they are used as model `where` clauses. We
ensure the data connector in question is allowed to use nested filtering
(if we try and do any), and ensure that every scalar field has mappings
for the appropriate data connector.
Hidden behind a feature flag, so technically a no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ab54f913157954e8197798febafc70012bfad9ad
### TODO
- [x] Validate the presence of arguments in the data connector schema
- [x] Add test for IR
- [x] Add test using custom connector
## Description
JIRA: https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-148
This is part 2 of the field arguments.
This will add the field arguments to the graphql schema and also handles
the execution part.
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [x] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Add support for field arguments
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <samir.talwar@hasura.io>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ea06b896feaca30419f81cd070fd4cfd608ef35b
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Doing some work on the `models` section and it's a bit big and
confusing, so doing a tidy-up to get my head around it all. Splits the
large module into separate files (`ordering`, `source`, `graphql`,
`filter` etc).
Only actual changes are:
- Move filter resolving to after model source is checked, so we can
refer to it. This will be useful for the thing I actually want to do.
- Make steps like `graphql` and `source` return the values they create
rather than mutating `Model` directly.
- Move some filter checks into `filter` rather than `source`, now we are
able to. This logic was all over the place.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 540db16d34590ed9e481c36d251ab5e1886f2c81
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Because we globbed for folders, we had to put a test in the root of each
folder which is messy. If we glob for files instead, like the `failing`
tests do, we can have a better time. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 381f5a44d9ae6100198bd28a286493bc3a2ba98e
Return a `T` instead of a `Result<T, E>` when we never return an error
(`E`) case.
I also enabled some more warnings. `unnecessary_box_returns` has been
suppressed where appropriate, and `unused_async` doesn't seem to be
violated anywhere any more.
I got rid of some calls to `.unwrap()` too.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 015ebd05978cf8c2d87474a90e0cd4333779a761
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This implements local relationships in the new `BooleanExpressionType`.
We copy all the existing tests for this and reimplement them using the
new types.
Things currently missing:
- a `BooleanExpressionType` can be specified to overwrite the target
model's `where` clause when defining. Currently we ignore this, there is
a follow up ticket for this:
https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-209
This work is behind a feature flag, so this is a no-op for the user.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6ae87e1ffb2ad0ebd27c6097e8ea87aca1a4c299
## Description
This PR adds the necessary new types and properties to OpenDD to support
aggregates over relationships. This follows the definition as laid out
in the [Aggregates
RFC](https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/blob/main/rfcs/aggregations.md#relationship).
In order to achieve this incrementally, the changes have been made to
the OpenDD types but have been hidden from the generated JSON Schema
behind `#[opendd(hidden)]` macros. New functionality needed to be added
to the macro to support this; see the changes in opendds-derive crate.
There are also a couple of fixes to incorrect comments in the existing
aggregate expression OpenDD types.
A future PR will bring metadata resolve logic to validate the usage of
the new OpenDD properties and types.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 75de972cf8d2115248b3bf91f51f320e8c22b1f8
We pretend we handle directives but we simply set them to an empty map,
and then don't actually use them at all.
This is completely unused code that can be removed.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a86dc43acc2de2f2d3f78f0c8ebc53ce9f5bde8c
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Making the schema work for boolean expressions has been challenging as
they are no longer tied to a single data connector, so we cannot do any
checks of whether a relationships is local or remote. We defer this to
the IR step when the source data connector for a relationship is known,
so that we can generate schema for boolean expressions decoupled from
any concept of data connector.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: d2923acedf92b031ba092bb83c515812c4d346f0
