### Description
This PR cleans `processRemoteJoins` by splitting the code, introducing comments, and applied the same strategies than #3810 did. Most importantly, it introduces a new module `RemoteJoin.Source`, made to be very similar to `RemoteJoin.RemoteSchema`, that exposes the required tooling to make a join call to a source, which decluters `Join`. Furthermore, this PR uses the same "dependency injection" to make the core of `Join` free from IO: this opens the door to testing the join engine in the unit tests.
None of the functions were modified when moved from their old module to the new one, but there's no way to easily see this in a diff.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3894
GitOrigin-RevId: 1e7c43006f092326e061f9ba12674e207b628bef
### Description
This PR moves Hasura-specific schema functions from `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class` into `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Common`. It also removes the two corresponding monad aliases, and consequently harmonizes several parts of the code to use the same common constraint.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3947
GitOrigin-RevId: 40985a7d86da97a311bd480f9a57cc18c350c2a8
## Description
We go through the module `Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.FromIr` and split it into separate self-contained units, which we document.
Note that this PR has a slightly opinionated follow-up PR #3909 .
### Related Issues
Fix#3666
### Solution and Design
The module `FromIr` has given rise to:
* `FromIr.Expression`
* `FromIr.Query`
* `FromIr.Delete`
* `FromIr.Insert`
* `FromIr.Update`
* `FromIr.SelectIntoTempTable`
And `Execute.MutationResponse` has become `FromIr.MutationResponse` (after some slight adaptation of types).
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3908
GitOrigin-RevId: 364acf1bcdf74f2e19464c31cdded12bd8e9aa59
### Description
This PR improves the `Collect` module by re-ordering the functions to make clear what is public API and what is internal implementation. Furthermore, it makes use of `traverseOf` and `traverseFields` to reduce duplication. To do so, it also introduces a few more lenses in the rest of the codebase, and uses this opportunity to harmonize some structures that were not following our naming convention.
While the diff is massive, a lot of it is just code moving around; the file is now divided into separate sections:
- entry points: IR types for which we want to run the collection
- internal monadic structure
- internal traversals: functions that do nothing but drill down further
- actual transformations: the three cases where we do actually have work to do: selection sets on which we do want to insert join columns, extract remote relationships... those functions are left unchanged by this PR
- internal helpers
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3863
GitOrigin-RevId: f7cbecfae9eed9737b62acfa5848bfcf9d4651f6
### Description
Despite making sure only a small range was used for each value, this test can nonetheless result in an explosion of memory usage: it has twice in a row resulted in my poor laptop filling its swap in a matter of seconds, forcing me to kill the test or hard-reboot my machine.
This small PR lowers the high bound of the range used for the generator, to a value that seems to consistently allows the test to finish in a more constrained environment.
Additionally, it also sorts the tests alphabetically: it makes it much easier when scrolling through the output to find a specific test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3942
GitOrigin-RevId: c7a786511fe82701fab29cf164dc3fbbe77f4262
### Description
#3810 was merged with comments still open; this small PR does a few minute clean-ups to address some remaining nits.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3941
GitOrigin-RevId: 3d15eb399828123640a73247b848bc4ddff02c38
### Description
This very small PR introduces `unionWithM`, to allow hashmap union that might fail, and uses it to transform an `error` into a `throw500`. It also reorders `HashMap.Strict.Extended` to group all "union" functions together.
There is, however, a broader question of whether we should encourage the proliferation of such functions. If so, we might also want to consider:
- `mapWithKeyM`, to remove the `unsafeMkName` of `RemoteJoin.Collect`
- `forWithKey`, as a flipped version of `traverseWithKey`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3917
GitOrigin-RevId: a488d5bf04a73878b9e42f27ede36199bb4c920a
### Description
This PR adds the ability to perform remote joins from remote schemas in the engine. To do so, we alter the definition of an `ExecutionStep` targeting a remote schema: the `ExecStepRemote` constructor now expects a `Maybe RemoteJoins`. This new argument is used when processing the execution step, in the transport layer (either `Transport.HTTP` or `Transport.WebSocket`).
For this `Maybe RemoteJoins` to be extracted from a parsed query, this PR also extends the `Execute.RemoteJoin.Collect` module, to implement "collection" from a selection set. Not only do those new functions extract the remote joins, but they also apply all necessary transformations to the selection sets (such as inserting the necessary "phantom" fields used as join keys).
Finally in `Execute.RemoteJoin.Join`, we make two changes. First, we now always look for nested remote joins, regardless of whether the join we just performed went to a source or a remote schema; and second we adapt our join tree logic according to the special cases that were added to deal with remote server edge cases.
Additionally, this PR refactors / cleans / documents `Execute.RemoteJoin.RemoteServer`. This is not required as part of this change and could be moved to a separate PR if needed (a similar cleanup of `Join` is done independently in #3894). It also introduces a draft of a new documentation page for this project, that will be refined in the release PR that ships the feature (either #3069 or a copy of it).
While this PR extends the engine, it doesn't plug such relationships in the schema, meaning that, as of this PR, the new code paths in `Join` are technically unreachable. Adding the corresponding schema code and, ultimately, enabling the metadata API will be done in subsequent PRs.
### Keeping track of concrete type names
The main change this PR makes to the existing `Join` code is to handle a new reserved field we sometimes use when targeting remote servers: the `__hasura_internal_typename` field. In short, a GraphQL selection set can sometimes "branch" based on the concrete "runtime type" of the object on which the selection happens:
```graphql
query {
author(id: 53478) {
... on Writer {
name
articles {
title
}
}
... on Artist {
name
articles {
title
}
}
}
}
```
If both of those `articles` are remote joins, we need to be able, when we get the answer, to differentiate between the two different cases. We do this by asking for `__typename`, to be able to decide if we're in the `Writer` or the `Artist` branch of the query.
To avoid further processing / customization of results, we only insert this `__hasura_internal_typename: __typename` field in the query in the case of unions of interfaces AND if we have the guarantee that we will processing the request as part of the remote joins "folding": that is, if there's any remote join in this branch in the tree. Otherwise, we don't insert the field, and we leave that part of the response untouched.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3810
GitOrigin-RevId: 89aaf16274d68e26ad3730b80c2d2fdc2896b96c
…rmance
It makes sense to try to utilize multiple threads for metadata
operations since we expect them to come one at a time (and likely at
lower load periods anyway).
As noted, although we build roles in parallel now, the admin role is
still a bottleneck. For replace_metadata on huge_schema, on my machine
I get:
BEFORE: 22.7 sec
AFTER: 13.5 sec
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3911
GitOrigin-RevId: 4d4ee6ac8b5506603e70e4fc666a3aacc054d493
Fixes#3364.
This removes code that's only there to collect some metrics that were apparently never collected in production anyway, as confirmed by this slack discussion: https://hasurahq.slack.com/archives/CTRL7L1PZ/p1645547435034329
> We don't ever ingest these statsd metrics to lux, nor on HC AFAIK.
We're keeping the command line options for the moment to allow lux time to stop passing them.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3365
GitOrigin-RevId: bc6aa2c18a7d3eb0779ed17494662df5b7b54a76
They're tied to old-style cabal, and graphql-engine doesn't build with
those anymore anyhow.
Also removes a cabal.project Cabal version constraint related to Setup.hs.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3847
GitOrigin-RevId: 715e836cd2ddf7982143ba0ab8821f87a5eac0b1
### Description
Several libraries define `catMaybes` as `mapMaybe id`. We had it defined in `Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended` already. This small PR also defines it in `Extended` modules for other containers and replaces every occurrence of `mapMaybe id` accordingly.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3884
GitOrigin-RevId: d222a2ca2f4eb9b725b20450a62a626d3886dbf4
In hasura/graphql-engine#5144, we noticed that having remote relationships in the schema is problematic for Relay. In particular, we don't support remote schemas in Relay at all, and because of this, remote relationships were also broken.
The fix was easy: when we're building the schema for Relay, whenever we encounter a remote relationship in our configuration, we simply skip building that field. The implementation was easy: (see hasura/graphql-engine#5145)
```diff
- SFRemoteRelationship info -> pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
+ SFRemoteRelationship info ->
+ -- https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/5144
+ if isRelay then [] else pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
```
A test case was added in that PR to prevent us from accidentally re-including remote relationships in the Relay schema. (However, it now looks like that test case does not function correctly.)
The above code was later refactored in #3037, making use of the `MaybeT` effect. However, this effect was not used correctly, so that the result of the check was ignored.
This fixes the code to use the `MaybeT` effect correctly.
CC @0x777 @rakeshkky
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3868
GitOrigin-RevId: e528303e01eacf60173cba1eec1898986cf12359
### Description
There were several places in the codebase where we would either implement a generic container, or express the need for one. This PR extracts / creates all relevant containers, and adapts the relevant parts of the code to make use of said new generic containers. More specifically, it introduces the following modules:
- `Data.Set.Extended`, for new functions on `Data.Set`
- `Data.HashMap.Strict.Multi`, for hash maps that accept multiple values
- `Data.HashMap.Strict.NonEmpty`, for hash maps that can never be constructed as empty
- `Data.Trie`, for a generic implementation of a prefix tree
This PR makes use of those new containers in the following parts of the code:
- `Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.RemoteJoin.Types`
- `Hasura.RQL.Types.Endpoint*`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3828
GitOrigin-RevId: e6c1b971bcb3f5ab66bc91d0fa4d0e9df7a0c6c6
The only purpose was enabling the developer API by default. I don't
think that justifies a flag and CPP usage.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3820
GitOrigin-RevId: 058c9a7b03e5e164ef88e35c42f50bae3c42b5b6
