### Description
The GraphQL spec has to conflicting requirements:
1. an object must contain at least one field: the schema may not contain empty objects
2. the _query_root_ must always be present
Given _1_, the schema generation code removes from the schema all fields that would result in empty objects, such as a table for which a user does not have select permissions. But, as a result, our code also potentially removes _query_root_ if it is empty, breaking _2_.
This PR introduces a dummy "placeholder" field in the query root if it's empty, to ensure we never remove it from the schema.
### Remaining work
- [x] changelog entry
- [x] tests
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/148
GitOrigin-RevId: bfd6bfcc2f3de92900b6ba566012f093399ca037
### Description
This PR is the result of a discussion in #3363. Namely, we would like to remove all uses of `unsafeMkName`, or at the very least document every single one of them, to avoid similar issues. To do so, this PR does the following:
- it adds a hlint suggestion not to use that function:
- suggestions don't mark the PR as failed, but will be shown at review time
- it is possible to disable that hint with `{- HLINT ignore myFunction "unsafe" -}`
- wherever possible, it removes uses of `unsafeMkName` in favour of `mkName`
- it adds a comment with a tracking issue for the two remaining uses:
- #3478
- #3479
### Remaining work
- discuss whether this hint should make the linter step fail, since the linter step isn't required to merge anyway, and there is a way to disable the hint wherever we think the use of that function is acceptable
- check that none of those uses were load-bearing and result in errors now
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3480
GitOrigin-RevId: 0a7e3e9d1a48185764c04ab61e34b58273af347c
## Description
When setting up a remote relationship to a remote schema, values coming from the left-hand side are given as _arguments_ to the targeted field of the remote schema. In turn, that means we need to adjust the arguments to that remote field; in the case of input objects, it means creating a brand new input object in which the relevant fields have been removed.
To both avoid conflicts, and be explicit, we give a pretty verbose name to such an input object: its original name, followed by "remote_rel", followed by the full name of the field (table name + relationship name). The bug there was introduced when working on extending remote relationships to other backends: we changed the code that translates the table name to a graphql identifier to be generic, and use the table's `ToTxt` instance instead. However, when a table is not in the default schema, the character used by that instance is `.`, which is not a valid GraphQL name.
This PR fixes it, by doing two things:
- it defines a safe function to translate LHS identifiers to graphql names (by replacing all invalid characters by `_`)
- it doesn't use `unsafeMkName` anymore, and checks at validation time that the type name is correct
## Further work
On this PR:
- [x] add a test
- [x] write a Changelog entry
Beyond this PR, we might want to:
- prioritize #1747
- analyze all calls to `unsafeMkName` and remove as many as possible
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3363
GitOrigin-RevId: fe98eb1d34157b2c8323af453f5c369de616af38
This commit introduces an "experimental" backend adapter to the GraphQL Engine.
It defines a high-level interface which will eventually be used as the basis for implementing separate data source query generation & marshaling services that communicate with the GraphQL Engine Server via some protocol.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2684
Co-authored-by: awjchen <13142944+awjchen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Parks <592078+cdparks@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 4463b682142ad6e069e223b88b14db511f634768
This PR pretty much does the same thing to remote relationship types in schemacache as what #2979 did to remote relationship types in the IR. On main remote relationships are represented by types of form `T from to`. This PR changes it to `T from` which makes it a lot more reusable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3037
GitOrigin-RevId: 90a5c9e2346c8dc2da6ec5b8c970d6c863d2afb8
this pr modifies the representation chosen for introspection parsers, "pushing down" the `Schema` input so it is not required to build the parser anymore. instead, the value produced when the parser is evaluated becomes a function that consumes a schema:
```diff
-schema :: MonadParse n => Schema -> FieldParser n ( J.Value)
+schema :: MonadParse n => FieldParser n (Schema -> J.Value)
```
this addresses points (1) and (2) of #2833 and is intended to make #2799 easier: we will need to enforce permissions when generating introspection objects, hiding fields the user is not allowed to see, so if we can pass the schema _later_, we can build this parser once, evaluate it once to (morally) obtain a function `Schema -> Value`, and simply run that single `Schema -> Value` function on different role-based schemas.
(we really need some terminology to be fixed here: "parser" is already not the best name, and then we have parser vs value/function "returned" by parser vs...)
however, we have immediate benefits: we no longer _need_ a `Schema` object to build the introspection parsers! this means we can remove the bogus "degenerate case" schema that is currently constructed in `emptyIntrospection` (and indeed we remove that binding altogether).
(fun fact: the diff for this pull request has a negative line count despite adding a lot of comments. @abooij says i have bragging rights in perpetuity now, à la @nicuveo)
changes:
- internal changes to the operation of the server, invisible outside of a small number of `GraphQL.Schema.*` modules
- no user-facing changes
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2835
Co-authored-by: Auke Booij <164426+abooij@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Simmons <210815+jberryman@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 9990f53b8f5c733424c4d71a24d94c13dee842ba
## Remaining Work
- [x] changelog entry
- [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested
- [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support
- [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary
- [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~
- ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171
- [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~
- cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172
## Description
This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API.
- it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console)
- it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124)
- it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149)
Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues:
- THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because:
- `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres.
As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
## Description
This PR fixes two issues:
- in [#2903](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903), we introduced a new metadata representation of remote relationships, which broke parsing a metadata blob containing an old-style db-to-rs remote relationship
- in [#1179](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1179), we silently and mistakenly deprecated `create_remote_relationship` in favour of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 45481db7a8d42c7612e938707cd2d652c4c81bf8
