Tiny change to the RFC to allow for _is_null / _and / _or / _not field renaming per-type in the future. V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: e090b300f804d72fe2127a5d769e12b89af44f7b
7.0 KiB
Open DD expression type changes
Motivation
Currently the boolean expression and order by expressions are defined as follows:
DataConnectorScalarRepresentation
Boolean expressions for scalars are implicitly defined by the comparison
operators of the NDC schema. The DataConnectorScalarRepresentation
defines the
following properties:
- When a scalar type appears as the argument type of a comparison operator, what
OpenDD type to use via the
representation
field. - What is the graphql type name to use for this scalar type's comparison expression.
There are a few problems with this:
- You would expect that the OpenDD
representation
of a scalar type applies everywhere it shows up, but in the context of object fields or arguments it's controlled by thetype
of the field/argument definition. This can actually differ from what the scalar type representation says. - If the argument type of a comparison operator is a complex object type, there is no way to know what OpenDD type to use, since we define this representation only for scalars.
- To allow for scalar types from different data connectors deployments (but the same underlying type of data connector, e.g. postgres) to be able to share the same comparison expression types, the engine subtly allows defining duplicate graphql type names as long as the comparison operators are identical. Ideally, this would be an explicit definition.
- There need to be multiple graphql types for the scalar comparison expression depending on which operators are enabled. Supporting this within the current definition would involve defining a graphql type name per-combination of operators which is awkward.
ObjectBooleanExpressionType
The ObjectBooleanExpressionType
configures a boolean expression on an object
type. It lets the user define which fields of the object are comparable and
which scalar comparison operators to enable for each field. This has the
following problems:
- Fields don't have to have scalar types, they can have object types too which isn't handled by the current definition.
- You cannot control the behavior of the
is_null
operation which isn't a regular comparison operator defined on a scalar type. - You can't control which relationships can be used for comparison.
Model orderableFields
The orderableFields
field of a Model
configure the order by expression for
that model. This has similar problems to ObjectBooleanExpressionType
.
- Fields that have object types aren't handled at all.
- You can't control which relationships can be used for ordering.
Proposal
This RFC proposes the following changes:
- Remove the existing constructs for configuring these expressions completely.
- Add a common
kind: BooleanExpressionType
that works for both scalar types and object types. - Do not tie boolean expressions to a particular NDC type, but instead define
them purely in OpenDD terms and then map them to NDC scalar types / operators
(similar to how we map
Model
s andObjectType
s). This allows flexible composition and explicit reuse of boolean expressions. - Add a
kind: OrderByExpression
which is used to configure order by expressions. This will allow supporting nested order by expressions. Note that this is not an OpenDD type and cannot be used as a field/argument type.
BooleanExpressionType
Scalar boolean expressions
kind: BooleanExpressionType
version: v1
definition:
name: Int_comparison_exp_with_eq_within_and_is_null
operand:
scalar:
type: Int
comparisonOperators:
- name: _eq # Name you want to give the operator in OpenDD / graphql
argumentType: Int! # This is an OpenDD type
- name: _within
argumentType: WithinInput!
- name: _in
argumentType: "[Int!]!"
dataConnectorOperatorMapping:
- dataConnectorName: pg_1
dataConnectorScalarType: int8
operatorMapping:
_within: int_within
_eq: _eq
- dataConnectorName: pg_2
dataConnectorScalarType: int8
# defaults to the same operator name (e.g. "_eq: _eq") if no explicit mapping is present.
operatorMapping:
_within: int_within
# whether to enable _is_null
isNull:
# This is nested to allow for renaming of is_null here in the future
enable: true
graphql:
typeName: Int_comparison_exp_with_eq_within_and_is_null
Object boolean expressions
kind: BooleanExpressionType
version: v2
definition:
name: Album_bool_exp
operand:
object:
# This is an OpenDD object type
type: Album
comparableFields:
- fieldName: AlbumId
# Use this boolean expression for this field
booleanExpressionType: pg_Int_Comparison_exp
- fieldName: ArtistId
booleanExpressionType: pg_Int_Comparison_exp_with_is_null
# This field has a complex type.
- fieldName: Address
booleanExpressionType: Address_bool_exp
comparableRelationships:
- relationshipName: artist
# This is optional for relationships to models, and defaults to the filterExpressionType of the model
booleanExpressionType: Artist_bool_exp
# whether to enable _and / _or / _not
logicalOperators:
# This is nested to allow for renaming of logical operators here in the future
enable: true
# whether to enable _is_null
isNull:
# This is nested to allow for renaming of is_null here in the future
enable: true
graphql:
typeName: App_Album_bool_exp
OrderByExpression
Note: This is not an OpenDD type and cannot be used in as the type of a field/argument.
kind: OrderByExpression
version: v1
definition:
# This name is unique only in the context of the `orderedType`.
name: Album_order_by_exp
orderedType: Album
orderableFields:
- fieldName: AlbumId
enableOrderByDirections: [Asc, Desc]
- fieldName: ArtistId
enableOrderByDirections: [Asc]
- # This field has an object type
fieldName: Address
# Use this order by expression for this object type
orderByExpression: Address_order_by_default_exp
# Only local relationships are permitted.
orderableRelationships:
- relationshipName: artist
# orderByExpression is optional for model relationships.
# If you don't specify it, we use the model's orderByExpression configuration.
# For local command relationships, this is required.
orderByExpression: Artist_order_by_default_exp
graphql:
expressionTypeName: App_Album_order_by_exp
Consequently, the changes in kind: Model
would be:
- Bump it to
version: v2
. - Remove
orderableFields
key. - Remove
graphql.orderByExpressionType
key. - Add
orderByExpression
key.
kind: Model
version: v2
definition:
name: Albums
objectType: Album
filterExpressionType: Album_bool_exp
# This replaces orderableFields
orderByExpression: Album_order_by_exp
graphql:
selectMany:
queryRootField: App_Albums
# There is no `orderByExpressionType` anymore within `graphql`.