Instead of having UN & RF (& Hole in the near future & maybe even
more later e.g. operator names) we have a single UN constructor
that takes a UserName instead of a String.
UserName is (for now)
```idris
data UserName : Type where
Basic : String -> UserName -- default name constructor e.g. map
Field : String -> UserName -- field accessor e.g. .fst
Underscore : UserName -- no name e.g. _
```
This is extracted from the draft PR #1852 which is too big to easily
debug. Once this is working, I can go back to it.
Why:
* To implement robust cross-project go-to-definition in LSP
i.e you can jump to definition of any global name coming
from library dependencies, as well as from the local project files.
What it does:
* Modify `FC`s to carry `ModuleIdent` for .idr sources,
file name for .ipkg sources or nothing for interactive runs.
* Add `--install-with-src` to install the source code alongside
the ttc binaries. The source is installed into the same directory
as the corresponding ttc file. Installed sources are made read-only.
* As we install the sources pinned to the related ttc files we gain
the versioning of sources for free.
broaden what Names can be reflected and refied
I did not add the Names I wasn't sure how to test but have put placeholders
that produce clearer error messages.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the underlying representation of
namespaces rather than say what we mean (using `isSuffixOf` to mean
`isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementation when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This PR introduces a `Namespace` newtype containing a list of strings.
Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the exposed
interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the representation rather than say
what we mean (e.g. using `isSuffixOf` to mean `isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementations when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This introduces a Namespace newtype containing non-empty lists of
strings. Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the
exposed interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
Add %runElab and start on scripts, although all they can do so far is
check a term. This does gives us, sort of, "template Idris" (as
demonstrated in test reflection002)
Don't get too excited yet - I want this in so that it doesn't get too
out of sync, but I still have to think about exactly how it's going to
work in practice.
