When bootstrapping, we're building things without packages being
available, so we can't expect to find them when looking for
dependencies. So, we find them another way, with an environment
variable. This flag is to tell Idris not to worry about missing
dependencies in this situation.
We also need to update the bootstrapping code, to deal with the new
version number format and new flag in the ipkg files for the libraries.
I think it's still safe to build from the previous version though - lets
see if CI agrees!
Packages are now installed in a directory with their version number.
On adding a package directory, we now look in a local 'depends'
directory first (to allow packages to be installed locally to another
project) before the global install directory.
Dependencies can have version bounds (details yet to be implemented) and
we pick the package with the highest version number that matches.
`countFrom` must have been made public accidentally:
* it is defined in the ranges section of the file, not stream section
* it is used only in `Range` implementation
* the same function `iterate` is defined in `Data.Stream`
```
countFrom start next
```
is the same as
```
iterate next start
```
Ideally, liftIO would always be linear, but that has lots of knock-on
effects for other monads which we might want to put in HasIO, now that
subtyping is gone. We'll have to revisit this when we have some kind of
multiplicity polymorphism.
It's disappointing to have to do this, but I think necessary because
various issue reports have shown it to be unsound (at least as far as
inference goes) and, at the very least, confusing. This patch brings us
back to the basic rules of QTT.
On the one hand, this makes the 1 multiplicity less useful, because it
means we can't flag arguments as being used exactly once which would be
useful for optimisation purposes as well as precision in the type. On
the other hand, it removes some complexity (and a hack) from
unification, and has the advantage of being correct! Also, I still
consider the 1 multiplicity an experiment.
We can still do interesting things like protocol state tracking, which
is my primary motivation at least.
Ideally, if the 1 multiplicity is going to be more generall useful,
we'll need some kind of way of doing multiplicity polymorphism in the
future. I don't think subtyping is the way (I've pretty much always come
to regret adding some form of subtyping).
Fixes#73 (and maybe some others).
This mirrors the (>>) found in Haskell, which is the same as (>>=), except the
second computation (on the right hand side) takes no arguments, and the result
of the first computation is discarded. This is a trivial implementation written
in terms of (>>=).
useful items for applying multiple predicates, e.g.
sortBy (comparing length <+> compare)
To sort some lists elements by length and then lexographically
