Things like (,) () aren't straightforward IVar's but are IAlternative's
which present options about how the term should resolve. [| |] was not
accounting for this.
useful items for applying multiple predicates, e.g.
sortBy (comparing length <+> compare)
To sort some lists elements by length and then lexographically
`Core.Context` is 2k+ LoC and contains a *lot* of different thins.
Rather than moving the `log` functions above of `addData` to be able
to add logging there, fork them off to independent files to make the
whole thing more readable.
Nipping this historical artifact in the bud before it roots. It's often
useful to be able to `map` directly to the result of a StateT computation
and due to how Functor works this is made harder when the tuple is
(a,state) vs (state,a)
* [contrib] Add misc libraries to contrib
Expose some `private` function in libs/base that I needed, and seem like
their visibility was forgotten
I'd appreciate a code review, especially to tell me I'm
re-implementing something that's already elsewhere in the library
Mostly extending existing functionality:
* `Data/Void.idr`: add some utility functions for manipulating absurdity.
* `Decidable/Decidable/Extra.idr`: add support for double negation elimination in decidable relations
* `Data/Fun/Extra.idr`:
+ add `application` (total and partil) for n-ary functions
+ add (slightly) dependent versions of these operations
* `Decidable/Order/Strict.idr`: a strict preorder is what you get when
you remove the diagonal from a pre-order. For example, `<` is the
associated preorder for `<=` over `Nat`.
Analogous to `Decidable.Order`. The proof search mechanism struggled
a bit, so I had to hack it --- sorry.
Eventually we should move `Data.Fun.Extra.Pointwise` to `Data.Vect.Quantifiers` in base
but we don't have any interesting uses for it at the moment so it's not
urgent.
Co-authored by @gallais
There's some missing flexibility in how foreign specifiers can be used with
scheme that is addressed here with minimal changes to how scheme specifiers
are read. This opens up uses for users that they otherwise would have had
to modify the compiler's support files to accomplish.
When synthesizing clauses, allow synthesised clauses to be
partial.
It's an arbitrary choice, the other choice can be the default
option. But if the place in which we're synthesising has a non-default
choice, then we're synthesising under the wrong option too.
Auxiliary functions introduced in elaboration (e.g., through case splits and with clauses) now
have the same totality annotation as the function they're defined in.
Moved auxiliary function `findSetTotal` into `Context.idr` since it's
now used by `ProcessDef.idr` too.
Added a totality requirement argument to `checkClause` so that the
with-clause case could propagate it to the functions it generates in
elaboration.
Sandwhich the rhs elaboration in pattern matches with code that sets
the global, default, totality requirement to the current one, and
restores the previous default afterwards. It's a bit of a hacky way to
do it, but I don't think we have a better alternative with the current
design.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the underlying representation of
namespaces rather than say what we mean (using `isSuffixOf` to mean
`isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementation when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This PR introduces a `Namespace` newtype containing a list of strings.
Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the exposed
interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the representation rather than say
what we mean (e.g. using `isSuffixOf` to mean `isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementations when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This introduces a Namespace newtype containing non-empty lists of
strings. Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the
exposed interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
