running pinta after https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/31497
results in:
```
Unhandled Exception:
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f' or one of its dependencies.
File name: 'glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f'
[ERROR] FATAL UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f' or one of its dependencies.
File name: 'glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f'
```
The build for the version 5.4.0 of digiKam has been broken at the time
prior to this commit, which is the main reason for this update as I
don't think it makes sense to fix the build for 5.4.0 when we're going
to update it anyway.
A lot has changed upstream between version 5.4.0 and 5.7.0 and it's too
much to be summarized here, so here are the URLs to the upstream
announcements:
* https://www.digikam.org/news/2017-03-14_digiKam_5.5.0_is_released/
* https://www.digikam.org/news/2017-06-21-5.6.0-release-announcement/
* https://www.digikam.org/news/2017-09-11-5.7.0_release_announcement/
On the packaging side, we now no longer have the patch that disables
-fno-operator-names because the build runs fine without that patch
(which didn't even apply but I didn't check why) and IMO it doesn't make
sense to rebase that patch for no reason.
Additionally, there were build time dependencies lurking around in
propagatedBuildInputs, which is kinda pointless and the application just
runs fine if those dependencies are listed in buildInputs.
While looking for clues about why that might be necessary I haven't
found any comment about it in the source nor a clarification within the
message of the commit where this has been introduced.
The commit in question is be7b7d908f.
Apart from these changes, the rest is just adding a few dependencies
(kcalcore, libksane, mesa and pcre) to get less errors during
cmakeConfigurePhase.
I've tested digiKam by playing around within a VM using photos I
netcat'ed into it and it works so far. The VM was built using:
nix-build nixos --arg configuration '{ pkgs, ... }: {
imports = [ ./nixos/tests/common/user-account.nix ];
environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.digikam ];
services.xserver.enable = true;
services.xserver.displayManager.sddm.enable = true;
services.xserver.desktopManager.plasma5.enable = true;
services.xserver.desktopManager.default = "plasma5";
virtualisation.memorySize = 1024;
}' -A vm
What I didn't test however was whether importing from a camera would
work (as I don't have one), but aside from that, the application seems
to run fine compared to the fact that it didn't even build until now :-)
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @the-kenny, @urkud, @viric, @cillianderoiste, @ttuegel
Cc: @jraygauthier, @fkz, @sh01, @lsix
New features since version 3.2.0:
* G'MIC Plugin
* Touch Painting
* Smart Patch Tool
* New Brush Presets
The full release notes can be found at:
https://krita.org/en/release-notes-for-krita-3-2/
Version 3.2.1 contains these fixes:
* Crash on startup if only OpenGL 2.1 is found: if you had to disable
opengl for 3.2.0, you can try to enable it again
* A crash when changing layer types in the gmic-qt plugin
* A bug where gmic-qt could crash on odd-sized images
* A regression where using the text tool would break the brush tool
* The option to use the native platform's file dialogs was restored
* A bug where selecting the line tool would disable the flow slider
* Some issues with the LUT docker were fixed
Upstream release notes for 3.2.1:
https://krita.org/en/item/krita-3-2-1-released/
I've dropped the patch, because it was already from the upstream
development version and thus is also included in this release.
Built and tested using a few images and just playing around with a few
new features.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @abbradar, @Mic92, @kragniz
This reverts commit 0a944b345e, reversing
changes made to 61733ed6cc.
I dislike these massive stdenv changes with unclear motivation,
especially when they involve gratuitous mass renames like NIX_CC ->
NIX_BINUTILS. The previous such rename (NIX_GCC -> NIX_CC) caused
months of pain, so let's not do that again.
