mirror of
https://github.com/ilyakooo0/urbit.git
synced 2024-12-16 02:22:12 +03:00
618cfa862b
* recommend using sh/merge-with-custom-msg * recommend cherry-picking merge commits * drop hep from release candidate tag format * minor other additions
216 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
216 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
# Maintainers' Guide
|
|
|
|
## Hotfixes
|
|
|
|
Here lies an informal guide for making hotfix releases and deploying them to
|
|
the network.
|
|
|
|
Take [this PR][1], as an example. This constituted a great hotfix. It's a
|
|
single commit, targeting a problem that existed on the network at the time.
|
|
Here's it should be released and deployed OTA.
|
|
|
|
[1]: https://github.com/urbit/urbit/pull/2025
|
|
|
|
### If the thing is acceptable to merge, merge it to master
|
|
|
|
Unless it's very trivial, it should probably have a single "credible looking"
|
|
review from somebody else on it.
|
|
|
|
You should avoid merging the PR in GitHub directly. Instead, use the
|
|
`sh/merge-with-custom-msg` script -- it will produce a merge commit with
|
|
message along the lines of:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Merge branch FOO (#PR_NUM)
|
|
|
|
* FOO:
|
|
bar: ...
|
|
baz: ...
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: SIGNER <signer@example.com>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
We do this as it's nice to have the commit log information in the merge commit,
|
|
which GitHub's "Merge PR" button doesn't do (at least by default).
|
|
`sh/merge-with-custom-msg` performs some useful last-minute urbit-specific
|
|
checks, as well.
|
|
|
|
You might want to alias `sh/merge-with-custom-msg` locally, to make it easier
|
|
to use. My .git/config contains the following, for example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[alias]
|
|
mu = !sh/merge-with-custom-msg
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
so that I can type e.g. `git mu origin/foo 1337`.
|
|
|
|
### Apply the changes to this era's release branch
|
|
|
|
For now, the release branch corresponds to the `vx.y` part of the most recent
|
|
Vere release (i.e., `urbit vx.y.z`). At the time of writing, we're on v0.10
|
|
(and I'll use this branch as a running example):
|
|
|
|
If the branch doesn't yet exist, just create it via:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
git checkout -b v0.10 master
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you can get away with merging master to v0.10 without pulling in any
|
|
superfluous or non-OTA-able commits, feel free to do that. Otherwise, you'll
|
|
want to cherry pick the commits like so:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
git cherry-pick -x TARGET_COMMITS
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Use the `-x` flag to `git-cherry-pick`, because this will indicate in the
|
|
commit message where the things originally came from.
|
|
|
|
A useful technique is to cherry-pick merge commits on master directly. Take
|
|
following commit, for example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
commit 769996d09
|
|
Merge: 171fcbd26 8428f0ab1
|
|
Author: Jared Tobin <jared@tlon.io>
|
|
Date: Sun Feb 2 19:11:04 2020 +0400
|
|
|
|
Merge branch 'liam-fitzgerald/langserver-doc-autocomplete' (#2204)
|
|
|
|
* liam-fitzgerald/langserver-doc-autocomplete:
|
|
language-server: magic-spoon hover, autocomplete
|
|
language-server: build ford prelude
|
|
language-server: dynamically compute subject
|
|
language-server: revive rune/symbol completion
|
|
language-server: add completion JSON parsers
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jared Tobin <jared@tlon.io>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
rather than cherry-picking the individual commits, one could just use the
|
|
following while on the release branch:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
git cherry-pick -x -m 1 769996d09
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
you can check the man page for `git-cherry-pick(1)` for details here.
|
|
|
|
Create Landscape or alternative pill builds, if or as appropriate (i.e., if
|
|
anything in Landscape changed -- don't trust any compiled JS/CSS that's
|
|
included in the commit).
|
|
|
|
You should always create a solid pill, in particular, as it's convenient for
|
|
tooling to be able to boot directly from a given release. If you're making a
|
|
Vere release, just play it safe and update all the pills.
|
|
|
|
### Tag the resulting commit
|
|
|
|
What you should do here depends on the type of release being made.
|
|
|
|
First, for Arvo releases:
|
|
|
|
If it's a very trivial hotfix that you know isn't going to break
|
|
anything, tag it as `arvo.yyyy.mm.dd`. Use an annotated tag, i.e.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
git tag -a arvo.yyyy.mm.dd
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The tag format should look something like this:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
arvo.yyyy.mm.dd
|
|
|
|
This release contains Arvo changes that will be pushed to the live
|
|
network as an over-the-air update.
|
|
|
|
Release notes:
|
|
|
|
[..]
|
|
|
|
Contributions:
|
|
|
|
[..]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You can get the "contributions" section by the shortlog between the
|
|
last release and this release:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
git log --pretty=short LAST_RELEASE.. | git shortlog
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
I originally tried to curate this list somewhat, but now just paste it
|
|
verbatim. If it's too noisy, yell at your colleagues to improve their commit
|
|
messages.
|
|
|
|
Try to include a high-level summary of the changes in the "release notes"
|
|
section. You should be able to do this by simply looking at the git log and
|
|
skimming the commit descriptions (or perhaps copying some of them in verbatim).
|
|
If the commit descriptions are too poor to easily do this, then again, yell at
|
|
your fellow contributors to make them better in the future.
|
|
|
|
If it's *not* a trivial hotfix, you should probably make any number of release
|
|
candidate tags (e.g. `arvo.yyyy.mm.dd.rc1`, `arvo.yyyy.mm.dd.rc2`, ..), test
|
|
them, and after you confirm one of them is good, tag the release as
|
|
`arvo.yyyy.mm.dd`.
|
|
|
|
For Vere releases:
|
|
|
|
Tag the release as `vx.y.z`. The tag format should look something
|
|
like this:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
urbit vx.y.z
|
|
|
|
This release contains Vere changes, so users should update their
|
|
binaries.
|
|
|
|
This is not a breaching release, so users should not create new
|
|
piers.
|
|
|
|
Release notes:
|
|
|
|
[..]
|
|
|
|
Contributions:
|
|
|
|
[..]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The same schpeel re: release candidates applies here.
|
|
|
|
Do not include implicit Arvo changes in Vere releases. This used to be done,
|
|
historically, but shouldn't be any longer. If there are Arvo and Vere changes
|
|
to be released, make two releases.
|
|
|
|
### Deploy the update
|
|
|
|
For Arvo updates, this means copying the files into ~zod's %base desk. The
|
|
changes will be synced to /~zod/kids and then propagated through other galaxies
|
|
and stars to the rest of the network.
|
|
|
|
For consistency, I download the release tarball and then rsync the files in:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ wget https://github.com/urbit/urbit/archive/arvo.yyyy.mm.dd.tar.gz
|
|
$ tar xzf arvo.yyyy.mm.dd.tar.gz
|
|
$ herb zod -p hood -d "+hood/mount /=base="
|
|
$ rsync -zr --delete urbit-arvo.yyyy.mm.dd/pkg/arvo/ zod/base
|
|
$ herb zod -p hood -d "+hood/commit %base"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For Vere updates, this means simply shutting down each desired ship, installing
|
|
the new binary, and restarting the pier with it.
|
|
|
|
### Announce the update
|
|
|
|
Post an announcement to urbit-dev. The tag annotation, basically, is fine here
|
|
-- I usually add the %base hash (for Arvo releases) and the release binary URLs
|
|
(for Vere releases). Check the urbit-dev archives for examples of these
|
|
announcements.
|
|
|