mirror of
https://github.com/pulsar-edit/pulsar.git
synced 2024-10-27 11:42:41 +03:00
477b075db5
To make https://github.com/atom-community/atom/pull/386 reviewable, that pr will be separated into many simpler prs. This is one of them. This first commit does the following: - update package.json - update package-lock.json using `./script/build` which also seems to update `apm/package-lock.json` - update packages/README.md - clone all language packages. Specifically: - `mkdir packages/language-<all of them>` - `cd packages/about` - For all languages: - `cd ../language-<>` - `git clone language-<>` - Move all files except `.git` from `language-<>/language-<>` to `language-<>` - delete `language-<>/language-<>` Since at first I accidentally updated `dependencies` then `packageDependencies`, it appears that since the versions of language-c, language-css, language-go, language-javascript, and language-sass don't match, `dependencies` was reset for those versions. [Those repos just happen to be precisely the ones that have tree-sitter v19](https://github.com/icecream17/atom-update-backlog/blob/main/Languages.md), (sans language-sass), which [currently breaks atom](https://github.com/atom/atom/issues/22129). So even though their repos are now in `packages`, **I've decided to not use them**. This is done by updating `packageDependencies` only for non-breaking languages.
29 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
29 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
### Requirements
|
|
|
|
* Filling out the template is required. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be reviewed in a timely manner may be closed at the maintainers' discretion.
|
|
* All new code requires tests to ensure against regressions
|
|
|
|
### Description of the Change
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
|
|
We must be able to understand the design of your change from this description. If we can't get a good idea of what the code will be doing from the description here, the pull request may be closed at the maintainers' discretion. Keep in mind that the maintainer reviewing this PR may not be familiar with or have worked with the code here recently, so please walk us through the concepts.
|
|
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Alternate Designs
|
|
|
|
<!-- Explain what other alternates were considered and why the proposed version was selected -->
|
|
|
|
### Benefits
|
|
|
|
<!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? -->
|
|
|
|
### Possible Drawbacks
|
|
|
|
<!-- What are the possible side-effects or negative impacts of the code change? -->
|
|
|
|
### Applicable Issues
|
|
|
|
<!-- Enter any applicable Issues here -->
|