1
1
mirror of https://github.com/rui314/mold.git synced 2024-09-22 10:27:48 +03:00
mold/BUGS.md
2020-11-05 19:44:56 +09:00

5.6 KiB

This is a note about interesting bugs that I met during the development of the mold linker.

GNU IFUNC

Problem: A statically-linked "hello world" program mysteriously crashed in __libc_start_main function which is called just after _start.

Investigation: I opened up gdb and found that the program reads a bogus value from some array. It looks like memcpy failed to copy proper data there. After some investigation, I noticed that memcpy did't copy data at all but instead returned the address of __memcpy_avx_unaligned function, which is a real memcpy function optimized for machines with the AVX registers.

This odd issue was caused by the GNU IFUNC mechanism. That is, if a function symbol has type STT_GNU_IFUNC, the function does not do what its name suggests to do but instead returns a pointer to a function that does the actual job. In this case, memcpy is an IFUNC function, and it returns an address of __memcpy_avx_unaligned which is a real memcpy function.

IFUNC function addresses are stored to .got section in an ELF executable. The dynamic loader executes all IFUNC functions at startup to replace their GOT entries with their return values. This mechanism allows programs to choose the best implementation among variants of the same function at runtime based on the machine info.

If a program is statically-linked, there's no dynamic loader that rewrites the GOT entries. Therefore, if a program is statically-linked, a libc's startup routine does that on behalf of the dynamic loader. Concretely, a startup routine interprets all dynamic relocations between __rela_iplt_start and __rela_iplt_start symbols. It is linker's responsibility to emit dynamic relocations for IFUNC symbols even if it is linking a statically-linked program and mark the beginning and the ending of a .rela.dyn section with the symbols, so that the startup routine can find the relocations.

The bug was my linker didn't define __rela_iplt_start and __rela_iplt_stop symbols. Since these symbols are weak, they are initialized to zero. From the point of the initializer function, there's no dynamic relocations between __rela_iplt_start and __rela_iplt_start symbols. That left GOT entries for IFUNC symbols untouched.

The proper fix was to emit dynamic relocations for IFUNC symbols and define the linker-synthesized symbols. I did that, and the bug was fixed.

stdio buffering

Problem: A statically-linked "Hello world" program prints out the message if executed as ./hello, but it doesn't output anything if executed as ./hello | cat.

Investigation: I knew that the default buffering mode for stdout is line buffering (buffer is flushed on every '\n'), but if it is not connected to the terminal (i.e. isatty(2) returns 0 on STDOUT_FILENO), it automatically switches to full buffering (buffer is flushed when it becomes full). So, it looks like libc failed to flush the stdout on program exit for some reason.

I traced all function calls using gdb and noticed that __libc_atexit was not called. That function seemed to be responsible for buffer flushing. I don't know how exactly I found the root cause, but after spending an hour or two, I found that __start___libc_atexit and __stop___libc_atexit have value 0 in my linker's output while they mark a section containing the address of __libc_atexit in GNU ld's output.

So, libc doesn't directly call __libc_atexit but instead call all function pointers between __start___libc_atexit and __stop___libc_atexit symbols. libc puts __libc_atexit address in _libc_atexit section, expecting that the linker automatically creates the start and the end marker symbols for the section.

There's an obscure linker feature: if a section name is valid as a C identifier (e.g. foo or _foo_bar but not .foo), the linker automatically creates marker symbols by prepending __start_ and __stop_ to the section name. My linker lacked the feature.

I implemented the feature, and the bug was fixed.

TLS variable initialization

Problem: A statically-linked "hello world" program crashes after reading a thread-local variable.

Investigation: Thread-local variables are very different from other types of varaibles because there may be more than one instance of the same variable in memory. Each thread has its copy of thread-local varaibles. %fs segment register points the end of the variable area for the current thread, and the variables are accessed as an offset from %fs.

Thread-local variables may be initialized (e.g. thread_local int x = 5;). The linker gathers all thread-local variables and put them into PT_TLS segment. At runtime, the contents of the segment is used as an "initialization image" for new threads. When a new thread is created, the image is memcpy'ed to the new thread's thread-local variable area. The initialization image itself is read-only at runtime.

It took more than a day to find out the location where the memcpy call copies the initialization image to is different from the location where the thread-local variables reside. As a result, thread-local variables have garbage as initial values, and the program crashes when using them.

The problem is that I set a very large value (4096) to the alignment of PT_TLS segment. All PT_LOAD segments are naturally aligned to the page boundary, so I use the same value for PT_TLS, but that was a mistake. When a thread initialization routine sets a value to %fs, it first aligns the end of the thread-local variable area address to PT_TLS alignment value. So, if you set a large value to PT_TLS alignment, %fs is set to a wrong place.

I fixed PT_TLS alignment, and the bug was gone.