First step for creating credentials for database proxy.
In next PRs:
- When calling endpoint, create database Postgres on proxy server
- Setup user on database using postgresCredentials
- Build remote server on DB to access workspace data
Update of select fields options was failing if we deleted an option that
was used for at least one row: former code would not update the value to
null but leave it to the no-longer-allowed value.
- Rename syncSubStatus to syncStage
- Rename ongoingSyncStartedAt to syncStageStartedAt
- Remove throttlePauseUntil from db and compute it with
syncStageStartedAt and throttleFailureCount
- Removing existing listener that was backfilling created records
without position
- Switch to a job that backfill all objects within workspace
- Adapting `FIND_BY_POSITION` so it can fetch objects without position.
Currently we needed to input a number
- refactor record position factory and record position query factory
- override position if not present during createMany
To avoid overriding the same positions for all data in createMany, the
logic is:
- if inserted last, use last position + arg index + 1
- if inserted first, use first position - arg index - 1
Our exception handler has to filter out some errors/exceptions so they
are not caught by the ExceptionHandlerDriver (Logged or Sentry for
example). This is done for Http errors in the range of 4xx and also
makes sure they are converted back to Graphql validation errors.
However, graphql validation errors that are already managed by Yoga
(with Schema validation) should also be filtered out, this PR should fix
that behaviour
In this PR, I'm refactoring the messaging module into smaller pieces
that have **ONE** responsibility: import messages, clean messages,
handle message participant creation, instead of having ~30 modules (1
per service, jobs, cron, ...). This is mandatory to start introducing
drivers (gmails, office365, ...) IMO. It is too difficult to enforce
common interfaces as we have too many interfaces (30 modules...). All
modules should not be exposed
Right now, we have services that are almost functions:
do-that-and-this.service.ts / do-that-and-this.module.ts
I believe we should have something more organized at a high level and it
does not matter that much if we have a bit of code duplicates.
Note that the proposal is not fully implemented in the current PR that
has only focused on messaging folder (biggest part)
Here is the high level proposal:
- connected-account: token-refresher
- blocklist
- messaging: message-importer, message-cleaner, message-participants,
... (right now I'm keeping a big messaging-common but this will
disappear see below)
- calendar: calendar-importer, calendar-cleaner, ...
Consequences:
1) It's OK to re-implement several times some things. Example:
- error handling in connected-account, messaging, and calendar instead
of trying to unify. They are actually different error handling. The only
things that might be in common is the GmailError => CommonError parsing
and I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense as these 3 apis might have
different format actually
- auto-creation. Calendar and Messaging could actually have different
rules
2) **We should not have circular dependencies:**
- I believe this was the reason why we had so many modules, to be able
to cherry pick the one we wanted to avoid circular deps. This is not the
right approach IMO, we need architect the whole messaging by defining
high level blocks that won't have circular dependencies by design. If we
encounter one, we should rethink and break the block in a way that makes
sense.
- ex: connected-account.resolver is not in the same module as
token-refresher. ==> connected-account.resolver => message-importer (as
we trigger full sync job when we connect an account) => token-refresher
(as we refresh token on message import).
connected-account.resolver and token-refresher both in connected-account
folder but should be in different modules. Otherwise it's a circular
dependency. It does not mean that we should create 1 module per service
as it was done before
In a nutshell: The code needs to be thought in term of reponsibilities
and in a way that enforce high level interfaces (and avoid circular
dependencies)
Bonus: As you can see, this code is also removing a lot of code because
of the removal of many .module.ts (also because I'm removing the sync
scripts v2 feature flag end removing old code)
Bonus: I have prefixed services name with Messaging to improve dev xp.
GmailErrorHandler could be different between MessagingGmailErrorHandler
and CalendarGmailErrorHandler for instance
Query read timeouts happen when a remote server is not available. It
breaks:
- the remote server show page
- the record table page of imported remote tables
This PR will catch the exception so it does not go to Sentry in both
cases.
Also did 2 renaming.
- add missing `excludedOperations` in
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/middlewares/graphql-hydrate-request-from-token.middleware.ts`
- update generated graphql file
- Add missing redirection to index after password update
Closes#5062.
Refactoring tables list to avoid rendering all toggles on each sync or
schema update while using fresh data:
- introducing id for RemoteTables in apollo cache
- manually updating the cache for the record that was updated after a
sync or schema update instead of fetching all tables again
Remote object id columns are not removed anymore when a remote object is
unsynced.
This is because we do not use relations anymore. We only created the id
field. So the current behavior that was implemented for custom objects,
to retrieve the fields to deleted, does not work.
Since remote object relations are really different, I extracted the
logic from `objectMetadataService`. It now handles only the relations
for custom objects creation and deletion (this part should be extracted
as well).
I create a new remote table relation service that will:
- fetch objects metadata linked to remotes (favorites,
activityTargets...)
- look for columns based on remote object name
- delete the fields and columns
Closes#5069 back-end part
And:
- do not display schemaPendingUpdates status on remote server lists as
this call will become too costly if there are dozens of servers
- (refacto) create foreignTableService
After this is merged we will be able to delete remoteTable's
availableTables column
