First step for creating credentials for database proxy.
In next PRs:
- When calling endpoint, create database Postgres on proxy server
- Setup user on database using postgresCredentials
- Build remote server on DB to access workspace data
I changed the Sort button used in the Header using
StyledHeaderDropdownButton component (the same used for Filter and
Options') instead of LightButton.
This PR aims to fix the issue: #5743
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
Fixing `setIsFocused is not a function` and the fact that edit buttons
were not showing up anymore.
A new FieldFocusContextProvider has been introduced and added to
RecordInlineCell but not ActivityTargetsInlineCell. This should fix the
issue.
<img width="523" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 17 42 07"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/1834158/1c1f919e-3829-4e40-b573-3b1b75b7c16f">
This is a small PR to improve the design of our CSV import.
I noticed the back button that was implemented in a recent PR #5625 was
broken and would need to be fixed (e.g. try to come back to the very
first upload step from the sheet selection step). cc @shashankvish0010
if you want to give a stab at fixing your PR that'd be amazing, thanks!
Update of select fields options was failing if we deleted an option that
was used for at least one row: former code would not update the value to
null but leave it to the no-longer-allowed value.
- Rename syncSubStatus to syncStage
- Rename ongoingSyncStartedAt to syncStageStartedAt
- Remove throttlePauseUntil from db and compute it with
syncStageStartedAt and throttleFailureCount
- Fix duplicate view field creation
- Fix redirect to proper settings data model page
- Refetch view fields after field creation (temporary solution)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5598
- Removing existing listener that was backfilling created records
without position
- Switch to a job that backfill all objects within workspace
- Adapting `FIND_BY_POSITION` so it can fetch objects without position.
Currently we needed to input a number
Fix issue introduced in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/5426
It's not a beautiful solution. Maybe one day we should have a dedicated
component for title but it also comes with downsides (lot of code to
copy paste, such as "esc" to leave field, copy button, etc.). This one
doesn't create less debt in my opinion. Once we have the layout/widget
system we might have a dedicated widget type and the right abstraction
layers
**Changes:**
- Changed -/+ to eye and eye off icons
- Changed menu width to 200px
- Created separate menu for hidden fields
- Added Edit Fields option to hidden fields menu
- Added test file MenuItemSelectTag (wasn't included in the issue)
As this is my first pr, feedback is very welcome!
**Note:**
These changes cover most of #4363 . I left out the implementation of the
RightIcon in the "Hidden Fields" menu item.
---------
Co-authored-by: kiridarivaki <k.darivaki03@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a new side panel to edit records and the ability to
minimize the side panel.
The goal is leverage this sidepanel to be able to create records while
being in another show page.
I'm opening the PR for feedback since it involved refactoring and
therefore already touches a lot of files, even though it was quick to
implement.
<img width="1503" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-23 at 17 41 37"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/6f17e7a8-f4e9-4eb4-b392-c756db7198ac">
- fix : #5521
When we deleted an opportunity that had been added to the favorites
list, the opportunity was removed correctly, but it still remained in
the favorites list. The issue was due to not accounting for the removal
of the opportunity from the favorites during the deletion process.
This problem has now been fixed :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/78202522/3d3cb689-3228-43fc-bf50-e824370582a7
Co-authored-by: Jeff Gasparini <jeff@Jeff.local>
Now all the required fields are displayed with the respective labels.
- Added a `FieldContextProvider` for the field `Reminder` in the
`ActivityEditorFields`.
- Fixed the missing label values, by adding a missed optional
`showLabel` within the `fieldDefinition` in the `useFieldContext`.
fixes: #5667
- refactor record position factory and record position query factory
- override position if not present during createMany
To avoid overriding the same positions for all data in createMany, the
logic is:
- if inserted last, use last position + arg index + 1
- if inserted first, use first position - arg index - 1
Now the fields don't disappear on drag and drop.
- After reviewing the codebase, I checked that when `inView` is true the
`RecordInlineCell` is rendered otherwise the
`StyledRecordInlineCellPlaceholder` will render which causes the fields
get disappear.
- So, I added the condition to check if `isDragSelectionStartEnabled` is
false then `StyledRecordInlineCellPlaceholder` will be rendered
otherwise `RecordInlineCell`.
fixes: #5651https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/140178357/022195ca-fec2-43a7-8808-f4974dbe66cf
---------
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Our exception handler has to filter out some errors/exceptions so they
are not caught by the ExceptionHandlerDriver (Logged or Sentry for
example). This is done for Http errors in the range of 4xx and also
makes sure they are converted back to Graphql validation errors.
However, graphql validation errors that are already managed by Yoga
(with Schema validation) should also be filtered out, this PR should fix
that behaviour
# This PR
- Fix#5278
- Updates the implementation of the `createOneObjectMataItem` hook to
reduce the number of api calls
- Users can now navigate to the newly created object first and the
graphql api calls to cache data are happening in the background - this
will improve the user experience and reduce the create object api call
time by >2
<img width="1508" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-30 at 12 00 15"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/61581306/46513fd1-d46e-40bc-a036-07e3acdf2870">
In the issue description, it also suggested to have a loading indicator
while creating the object, it seems like on #5352 we adopted to disable
it while creating the object - which looks good to me and it works, let
me know if we still need the loading indicator instead @Bonapara
Looking forward to getting your feedback
cc: @charlesBochet
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
In this PR, I'm refactoring the messaging module into smaller pieces
that have **ONE** responsibility: import messages, clean messages,
handle message participant creation, instead of having ~30 modules (1
per service, jobs, cron, ...). This is mandatory to start introducing
drivers (gmails, office365, ...) IMO. It is too difficult to enforce
common interfaces as we have too many interfaces (30 modules...). All
modules should not be exposed
Right now, we have services that are almost functions:
do-that-and-this.service.ts / do-that-and-this.module.ts
I believe we should have something more organized at a high level and it
does not matter that much if we have a bit of code duplicates.
Note that the proposal is not fully implemented in the current PR that
has only focused on messaging folder (biggest part)
Here is the high level proposal:
- connected-account: token-refresher
- blocklist
- messaging: message-importer, message-cleaner, message-participants,
... (right now I'm keeping a big messaging-common but this will
disappear see below)
- calendar: calendar-importer, calendar-cleaner, ...
Consequences:
1) It's OK to re-implement several times some things. Example:
- error handling in connected-account, messaging, and calendar instead
of trying to unify. They are actually different error handling. The only
things that might be in common is the GmailError => CommonError parsing
and I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense as these 3 apis might have
different format actually
- auto-creation. Calendar and Messaging could actually have different
rules
2) **We should not have circular dependencies:**
- I believe this was the reason why we had so many modules, to be able
to cherry pick the one we wanted to avoid circular deps. This is not the
right approach IMO, we need architect the whole messaging by defining
high level blocks that won't have circular dependencies by design. If we
encounter one, we should rethink and break the block in a way that makes
sense.
- ex: connected-account.resolver is not in the same module as
token-refresher. ==> connected-account.resolver => message-importer (as
we trigger full sync job when we connect an account) => token-refresher
(as we refresh token on message import).
connected-account.resolver and token-refresher both in connected-account
folder but should be in different modules. Otherwise it's a circular
dependency. It does not mean that we should create 1 module per service
as it was done before
In a nutshell: The code needs to be thought in term of reponsibilities
and in a way that enforce high level interfaces (and avoid circular
dependencies)
Bonus: As you can see, this code is also removing a lot of code because
of the removal of many .module.ts (also because I'm removing the sync
scripts v2 feature flag end removing old code)
Bonus: I have prefixed services name with Messaging to improve dev xp.
GmailErrorHandler could be different between MessagingGmailErrorHandler
and CalendarGmailErrorHandler for instance
