Reusing the useUploadAttachment Hook
In the implementation of the feature to ensure the attachment table is
updated whenever new images are added to a RICH_TEXT field #7617 , it is
likely that the useUploadAttachment hook is reused.
The useUploadAttachment hook is responsible for handling the upload of
attachments, including images, and returning the uploaded file URL. By
reusing this hook, you can leverage its existing functionality to handle
image uploads within the RICH_TEXT field.
In this case, the modified image handling logic would utilize the
useUploadAttachment hook to upload new images added to the RICH_TEXT
content. The hook would then return the uploaded file URL, which would
be used to update the attachment table with the details of the newly
added images.
By reusing the useUploadAttachment hook, you can avoid duplicating code
and ensure consistency in the way attachments are handled throughout the
application.
Fixes#6565
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
On the kanban page, the record creation was changed a few weeks ago to
enable creation on top / bottom of the columns.
However, this introduced a glitch (missing background opacity). While
fixing it, I have refactored the component structure to:
- separate "New" button from the Empty record card
- add `inputSchema` column in serverless function. This is an array of
parameters, with their name and type
- on serverless function id update, get the `inputSchema` + store empty
settings in step
- from step settings, build the form
TODO in next PR:
- use field type to decide what kind of form should be printed
- have a strategy to handle object as input
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ed96f919-24b5-4baf-a051-31f76f45e575
- Removing unique constraint creation in 0.32 as we have a dependency on
sync-metadata and sync-metadata has a dependency on it if we keep it.
- sync-metadata does not support well the deletion of activity +
activityTarget, silently swallow the exception for now
Fixes: #7460
**Changes & Why**
Since all the settings pages lie in the Outlet of DefaultLayout, there
was no way to handle it apart from creating a separate errorFallback for
the settings route.
So, I created a settingsErrorFallback component that uses the same
styling of settings pages.
Created ErrorBoundaryWrapper that checks if its settings route then show
SettingsErrorFallback else show GenericErrorFallback.
Now, for the breadcrumb part. I found that all the settings pages use
hardcoded title. So, I created generateBreadcrumbLinks function that
will provide different title and links based on how it's respective
settings page has them.
If this approach looks fine, I will add the other remaining titles and
links to the generateBreadcrumbLinks function and move that whole
function to its separate file. And will fix linting errors.
If there is any different approach to handle it, lemme know. I'm happy
to implement it.
We have previously fixed the unselection of table records on click
outside. However, the ref was mispositioned as it selected the full
height table. In the case of low record numbers, we also want the
unselection to happen on table body click
[This PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8210) introduced a
regression, causing noteId or taskId (respectively for noteTarget or
taskTarget creation) to be overwritten with an undefined value in the
input for noteTarget or taskTarget creation.
This is because in ActivityTargetInlineCellEditMode, in addition to the
noteId and taskId we are declaring, we are looking into the object
(noteTarget or taskTarget)'s fields and prefilling the record-to-create
with a value, potentially undefined, for all of the object fields.
So when looping over noteTarget's fields, we would find the `note`
relation field, and eventually add `note: undefined` to the
record-to-create input, in addition to the non-empty and valid existing
`noteId`.
Then in sanitizeRecordInput, from the note added right above, we add an
empty noteId to the input from node, overwriting the "good" noteId.
There are several ways to fix this, I chose to update prefillRecord not
to add an empty "note" object that makes no sense in addition to the
"noteId" we already have at this stage.
It is also possible to update `sanitizeRecordInput` not to overwrite a
value from a relation (noteId from note relation) if there is already a
value in the input.
Many dropdown bugs have been fixed, more refactoring is needed.
Dropdown fixed :
- Filter select
- Sort select
- Visible field select
- Hidden field select
- Multi item picker (phones, links, emails, etc.)
- Phone country select
