Closes#5748
- Create feature flag
- Add scope `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/profile.emails.read` when
connecting an account
- Get email aliases with google people API, store them in
connectedAccount and refresh them before each message-import
- Update the contact creation logic accordingly
- Refactor
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Class exception for each metadata module + handler to map on graphql
error
TODO left :
- find a way to call handler on auto-resolvers nestjs query (probably
interceptors)
- discuss what should be done for pre-hooks errors
- discuss what should be done for Unauthorized exception
This PR fix an issue with the `IsNull()` find operator applied on
one-to-many relation, this one is not supported by TypeORM.
We can instead filter by an empty array to retrieve object with empty
relations.
CSS modules were used as a first test for performance optimization.
We later found out that Linaria was a better tradeoff.
This PR removes what was implemented in CSS modules and also the CSS
theme file that was created that was overlapping with the TS theme
files.
querying workspaceMembers may be slow leads to wrong
setNextOnboardingStatus value. So we added a resolved field in workspace
to get workspaceMemberCount directly
In this PR, I'm simplifying storybook setup:
1) Remove build --test configuration that prevent autodocs. We are not
using autodocs at all (the dev experience is not good enough), so I have
completely disabled it.
2) Clarify `serve` vs `test` vs `serve-and-test` configurations
After this PR:
- you can serve storybook in two modes: `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve:dev` and `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve:static`
- you can run tests agains an already served storybook (this is useful
in dev so you don't have to rebuild everytime to run tests): `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:test`
- you can conbine both: `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve-and-test:static`
- move front `onboardingStatus` computing to server side
- add logic to `useSetNextOnboardingStatus`
- update some missing redirections in
`usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation`
- separate subscriptionStatus from onboardingStatus
- Put error handling outside of `refreshAndSaveAccessToken`
- return after failing to refresh access token in
`processMessageBatchImport`
- remove unnecessary token refresh in `processMessageListFetch`
This PR introduce a new decorator named `@WorkspaceJoinColumn`, the goal
of this one is to manually declare the join columns inside the workspace
entities, so we don't have to rely on `ObjectRecord` type.
This decorator can be used that way:
```typescript
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: ACTIVITY_TARGET_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.company,
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
label: 'Company',
description: 'ActivityTarget company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyWorkspaceEntity,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'activityTargets',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
company: Relation<CompanyWorkspaceEntity> | null;
// The argument is the name of the relation above
@WorkspaceJoinColumn('company')
companyId: string | null;
```
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR introduces an `upsert` parameter (along the existing `data`
param) for `createOne` and `createMany` mutations.
When upsert is set to `true`, the function will look for records with
the same id if an id was passed. If not id was passed, it will leverage
the existing duplicate check mechanism to find a duplicate. If a record
is found, then the function will perform an update instead of a create.
Unfortunately I had to remove some nice tests that existing on the args
factory. Those tests where mostly testing the duplication rule
generation logic but through a GraphQL angle. Since I moved the
duplication rule logic to a dedicated service, if I kept the tests but
mocked the service we wouldn't really be testing anything useful. The
right path would be to create new tests for this service that compare
the JSON output and not the GraphQL output but I chose not to work on
this as it's equivalent to rewriting the tests from scratch and I have
other competing priorities.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6016
This was another side effect of the optimization made on
RecordTableCellContainer to avoid using recoil states, but which causes
too many unpredictable side effects.
I just put back the previous system which works well. We'll see how to
optimize it again later.
#### Overview
This PR introduces a new API for dynamically registering and executing
pre and post query hooks in the Workspace Query Hook system using the
`@WorkspaceQueryHook` decorator. This approach eliminates the need for
manual provider registration, and fix the issue of `undefined` or `null`
repository using `@InjectWorkspaceRepository`.
#### New API
**Define a Hook**
Use the `@WorkspaceQueryHook` decorator to define pre or post hooks:
```typescript
@WorkspaceQueryHook({
key: `calendarEvent.findMany`,
scope: Scope.REQUEST,
})
export class CalendarEventFindManyPreQueryHook implements WorkspaceQueryHookInstance {
async execute(userId: string, workspaceId: string, payload: FindManyResolverArgs): Promise<void> {
if (!payload?.filter?.id?.eq) {
throw new BadRequestException('id filter is required');
}
// Implement hook logic here
}
}
```
This API simplifies the registration and execution of query hooks,
providing a more flexible and maintainable approach.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
To enable Google Calendar integration, you need to run `yarn
command:prod cron📆google-calendar-sync` in the worker
container. However, currently, the self-hosting guide does not tell you
how to do it. If you just follow the guide, only Gmail integration will
be enabled. So I added the command for calendar sync cron on
self-hosting-var.mdx.
As per title!
Also, I'm removing an incorrect logic in the enum migration runner that
takes care of the case where we have no defaultValue but non nullable
which is not a valid business case.
# This PR
- Revise my previous work (PR #5969)
Because it would break the current logic and cause unexpected behavior.
(Issue #5979)
- Solve (Issue #5915) with another way
@lucasbordeau What do you think about my current approach?
@JarWarren Please check it out—I'd love to get your feedback too!
---------
Co-authored-by: Achsan <achsanh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
