mirror of
https://github.com/unisonweb/unison.git
synced 2024-11-04 01:03:36 +03:00
0031542faf
This is for consistency with the `cmark` style. Now the blocks we still pretty-print ourselves will match the bulk of them that `cmark` produces.
13 KiB
13 KiB
This transcript explains a few minor details about doc parsing and pretty-printing, both from a user point of view and with some implementation notes. The later stuff is meant more as unit testing than for human consumption. (The ucm add
commands and their output are hidden for brevity.)
Docs can be used as inline code comments.
foo : Nat -> Nat
foo n =
_ = [: do the thing :]
n + 1
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
foo : Nat -> Nat
scratch/main> view foo
foo : Nat -> Nat
foo n =
use Nat +
_ = [: do the thing :]
n + 1
Note that @
and :]
must be escaped within docs.
escaping = [: Docs look [: like \@this \:] :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
escaping : Doc
scratch/main> view escaping
escaping : Doc
escaping = [: Docs look [: like \@this \:] :]
(Alas you can't have \@
or \:]
in your doc, as there's currently no way to 'unescape' them.)
-- Note that -- comments are preserved within doc literals.
commented = [:
example:
-- a comment
f x = x + 1
:]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
commented : Doc
scratch/main> view commented
commented : Doc
commented =
[: example:
-- a comment f x = x + 1
:]
Indenting, and paragraph reflow
Handling of indenting in docs between the parser and pretty-printer is a bit fiddly.
-- The leading and trailing spaces are stripped from the stored Doc by the
-- lexer, and one leading and trailing space is inserted again on view/edit
-- by the pretty-printer.
doc1 = [: hi :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc1 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc1
doc1 : Doc
doc1 = [: hi :]
-- Lines (apart from the first line, i.e. the bit between the [: and the
-- first newline) are unindented until at least one of
-- them hits the left margin (by a post-processing step in the parser).
-- You may not notice this because the pretty-printer indents them again on
-- view/edit.
doc2 = [: hello
- foo
- bar
and the rest. :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc2 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc2
doc2 : Doc
doc2 =
[: hello
- foo
- bar
and the rest. :]
doc3 = [: When Unison identifies a paragraph, it removes any newlines from it before storing it, and then reflows the paragraph text to fit the display window on display/view/edit.
For these purposes, a paragraph is any sequence of non-empty lines that have zero indent (after the unindenting mentioned above.)
- So this is not a paragraph, even
though you might want it to be.
And this text | as a paragraph
is not treated | either.
Note that because of the special treatment of the first line mentioned above, where its leading space is removed, it is always treated as a paragraph.
:]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc3 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc3
doc3 : Doc
doc3 =
[: When Unison identifies a paragraph, it removes any
newlines from it before storing it, and then reflows the
paragraph text to fit the display window on
display/view/edit.
For these purposes, a paragraph is any sequence of non-empty
lines that have zero indent (after the unindenting mentioned
above.)
- So this is not a paragraph, even
though you might want it to be.
And this text | as a paragraph
is not treated | either.
Note that because of the special treatment of the first line
mentioned above, where its leading space is removed, it is
always treated as a paragraph.
:]
doc4 = [: Here's another example of some paragraphs.
All these lines have zero indent.
- Apart from this one. :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc4 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc4
doc4 : Doc
doc4 =
[: Here's another example of some paragraphs.
All these lines have zero indent.
- Apart from this one. :]
-- The special treatment of the first line does mean that the following
-- is pretty-printed not so prettily. To fix that we'd need to get the
-- lexer to help out with interpreting doc literal indentation (because
-- it knows what columns the `[:` was in.)
doc5 = [: - foo
- bar
and the rest. :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc5 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc5
doc5 : Doc
doc5 =
[: - foo
- bar
and the rest. :]
-- You can do the following to avoid that problem.
doc6 = [:
- foo
- bar
and the rest.
:]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
doc6 : Doc
scratch/main> view doc6
doc6 : Doc
doc6 =
[: - foo
- bar
and the rest.
:]
More testing
-- Check empty doc works.
empty = [::]
expr = foo 1
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
empty : Doc
expr : Nat
scratch/main> view empty
empty : Doc
empty = [: :]
test1 = [:
The internal logic starts to get hairy when you use the \@ features, for example referencing a name like @List.take. Internally, the text between each such usage is its own blob (blob ends here --> @List.take), so paragraph reflow has to be aware of multiple blobs to do paragraph reflow (or, more accurately, to do the normalization step where newlines with a paragraph are removed.)
Para to reflow: lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor ending in ref @List.take
@List.take starting para lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
Middle of para: lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor @List.take lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
- non-para line (@List.take) with ref @List.take
Another non-para line
@List.take starting non-para line
- non-para line with ref @List.take
before a para-line lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
- non-para line followed by a para line starting with ref
@List.take lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
a para-line ending with ref lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor @List.take
- non-para line
para line lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
@List.take followed by non-para line starting with ref.
@[signature] List.take
@[source] foo
@[evaluate] expr
@[include] doc1
-- note the leading space below
@[signature] List.take
:]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
test1 : Doc
scratch/main> view test1
test1 : Doc
test1 =
[: The internal logic starts to get hairy when you use the
\@ features, for example referencing a name like @List.take.
Internally, the text between each such usage is its own blob
(blob ends here --> @List.take), so paragraph reflow has to
be aware of multiple blobs to do paragraph reflow (or, more
accurately, to do the normalization step where newlines with
a paragraph are removed.)
Para to reflow: lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem
ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum
dolor lorem ipsum dolor ending in ref @List.take
@List.take starting para lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem
ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
Middle of para: lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem
ipsum dolor @List.take lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
- non-para line (@List.take) with ref @List.take
Another non-para line
@List.take starting non-para line
- non-para line with ref @List.take
before a para-line lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem
ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum
dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
- non-para line followed by a para line starting with ref
@List.take lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum
dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor.
a para-line ending with ref lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum
dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor @List.take
- non-para line
para line lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum
dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
@List.take followed by non-para line starting with ref.
@[signature] List.take
@[source] foo
@[evaluate] expr
@[include] doc1
-- note the leading space below
@[signature] List.take
:]
-- Regression test for #1363 - preservation of spaces after @ directives in first line when unindenting
reg1363 = [: `@List.take foo` bar
baz :]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
reg1363 : Doc
scratch/main> view reg1363
reg1363 : Doc
reg1363 = [: `@List.take foo` bar baz :]
-- Demonstrate doc display when whitespace follows a @[source] or @[evaluate]
-- whose output spans multiple lines.
test2 = [:
Take a look at this:
@[source] foo ▶ bar
:]
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
test2 : Doc
View is fine.
scratch/main> view test2
test2 : Doc
test2 =
[: Take a look at this:
@[source] foo ▶ bar
:]
But note it's not obvious how display should best be handling this. At the moment it just does the simplest thing:
scratch/main> display test2
Take a look at this:
foo : Nat -> Nat
foo n =
use Nat +
_ = [: do the thing :]
n + 1 ▶ bar