mirror of
https://github.com/unisonweb/unison.git
synced 2024-09-17 13:27:30 +03:00
0031542faf
This is for consistency with the `cmark` style. Now the blocks we still pretty-print ourselves will match the bulk of them that `cmark` produces.
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
unique type Foo = Bar Nat
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These new definitions are ok to `add`:
type Foo
scratch/main> add
⍟ I've added these definitions:
type Foo
scratch/main> move.term Foo.Bar Stray.Bar
Done.
Now we've set up a situation where the constructor is not where it's supposed to be; it's somewhere else.
unique type Foo = Bar Nat Nat
Loading changes detected in scratch.u.
I found and typechecked these definitions in scratch.u. If you
do an `add` or `update`, here's how your codebase would
change:
⍟ These names already exist. You can `update` them to your
new definition:
type Foo
Note that the constructor name shown here (implied to be called Foo.Stray.Bar
) doesn't really exist, it's just showing up due to a pretty-printer bug.
scratch/main> view Foo
type Foo = Stray.Bar Nat
scratch/main> update
Okay, I'm searching the branch for code that needs to be
updated...
I couldn't complete the update because the type Foo has
unnamed constructors. (I currently need each constructor to
have a name somewhere under the type name.)
You can use `view Foo` and
`alias.term <hash> Foo.<ConstructorName>` to give names to
each constructor, and then try the update again.