`cargo test --release --all` was broken by a recent update.
Interesting that it only broke when building tests.
Regardless: these deps should probably have always been required,
so this is a legit change.
This could be reproduced via `wezterm connect localhost`.
This bug was surfaced after the last release added a Drop impl
to cleanup the display.
This commit tracks the display in the connection.
closes: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/252
When returning the title string we prefer to return the OSC 1 Icon
title (which is interpreted as "tab title" by some emulators and
shell toolkits) on the basis that it will have been setup for
display in a more limited width than the overall window title
and will thus likely be a better choice to show to the user.
If OSC 1 hasn't been set then we'll fall back to the OSC 2 window
title as before.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/247
This isn't a fix by any stretch of the imagination, but it stops
a crash. Should be good enough until I get a chance to fix this
properly.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/252
OSC 1 is defined as setting the "Icon Title".
OSC 2 is defined as setting the "Window Title".
OSC 0 sets both of those.
Some terminal emulators will display the Icon title as the tab
title.
Wezterm doesn't make a distinction between any of those things; the
title is applied (during escape sequence parsing) to the terminal
instance in isolation from any other terminals; when the GUI layer
renders the titlebar it is composed from the title in the active tab.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/247
This tidies up the valgrind output some more, but seems to highlight
some leaks in the egl implementation around init/shutdown.
I still don't see a smoking gun for a memory leak that grows over time.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/238
I'm wondering if the non-deterministic portion of
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/241
might be due to splitting of data across multiple write calls.
This commit adopts the use of BufWriter around the writer so that
we can buffer up and explicitly flush the responses to the terminal.
When running on a 30bpp display with 2 bit alpha, eglChooseConfig
will match and list the 10bpc configuration first, which don't match
the desired pixel format.
Filter the config list so that it only includes 8bpc configurations.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/240
In refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/240 there are a number
of configurations that report 0 for the alpha size and where we are
unable to otherwise find a working config.
This is a speculative commit to releax the alpha channel size to
basically anything available and see if that helps.
This commit refactors the wayland EGL init code to call into the
non-wayland init code which is more in the spirit of DRY.
It also highlights that we were requesting PBUFFER and PIXMAP capable
contexts in the non-wayland case. Since we appear to survive without
those in the wayland renderer, presumably we can survive without them
in all cases.
This may help with activating opengl for this issue:
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/240
While looking into what it might take to support 10bpc (30bpp) displays
(https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/240) I was experimenting with
Xephyr at a reduced 16bpp depth and noticed that the server still
offered a 32bpp TrueColor depth option.
This commit adjusts the window/bitmap code to allow it to select depths
24bpp or 32bpp, preferring the largest depth. we restrict ourselves to
24 and 32 bit selections for this, as those appear to be bit for bit
compatible for the r/g/b channels. I suspect that 10bpc will require
some scaling somewhere.
This change allows running wezterm against the reduced depth Xephyr, but
since Xephyr doesn't support GL it runs with the software renderer; I
don't know quite how opengl is going to play with this. I can confirm
that running wezterm on my native 24bpp display when it picks a 32bpp
visual does run with opengl enabled, so maybe this is good enough?
8f1f1a65ea added support for probing
for opengl extensions, and I thought that I had the fallback covered
but it turned out that we were only falling back if one of the major
extensions wasn't present.
This commit adds a fallback for the case where things look ok at
first glance, but where they fail at runtime for whatever reason.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/235
