As part of making tuples first-class citizens, expliciting the arity upon
function application was needed (so that a function of two args can
transparently -- in the surface language -- be applied to either two arguments
or a pair).
It was decided to actually explicit the whole type of arguments because the cost
is the same, and this is consistent with lambda definitions.
A related change done here is the replacement of the `EOp` node for operators by
an "operator application" `EAppOp` node, enforcing a pervasive invariant that
operators are always directly applied. This makes matches terser, and highlights
the fact that the treatment of operator application is almost always different
from function application in practice.
This changes the `decl_ctx` to be toplevel only, with flattened references to
uids for most elements. The module hierarchy, which is still useful in a few
places, is kept separately.
Module names are also changed to UIDs early on, and support for module aliases
has been added (needs testing).
This resolves some issues with lookup, and should be much more robust, as well
as more convenient for most lookups.
The `decl_ctx` was also extended for string ident lookups, which avoids having
to keep the desugared resolution structure available throughout the compilation
chain.
rather than scattered in structures
The context is still hierarchical for defs though, so one needs to retrieve the
path to lookup in the correct context for info. Exceptions are enums and struct
defs, which are re-exposed at toplevel.
Two interdependent changes here:
1. Enforce all instances of Shared_ast.gexpr to use the generic type for marks.
This makes the interfaces a tad simpler to manipulate: you now write
`('a, 'm) gexpr` rather than `('a, 'm mark) gexpr`.
2. Define a polymorphic `Custom` mark case for use by pass-specific annotations.
And leverage this in the typing module
Some typing errors are changed a little, because they get triggered during the
typing of the disambiguation pass, which does not specify the expected return
type (it's an expected invariant that it should not be needed for
disambiguation).
It would be possible to still specify these types during disambiguation just to
get the same errors, but since the newer ones don't appear to be clearly worse
at the moment, it has not been done.
This is just a bunch of `sed` calls:
```shell
sed -i 's/ScopeSet/ScopeName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/ScopeMap/ScopeName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/StructMap/StructName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/StructSet/StructName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/EnumMap/EnumName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/EnumSet/EnumName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/StructFieldName/StructField/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/StructFieldMap/StructField.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/StructFieldSet/StructField.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/EnumConstructorMap/EnumConstructor.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/EnumConstructorSet/EnumConstructor.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/RuleMap/RuleName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/RuleSet/RuleName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/LabelMap/LabelName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/LabelSet/LabelName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/ScopeVarMap/ScopeVar.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/ScopeVarSet/ScopeVar.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/SubScopeNameMap/SubScopeName.Map/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
sed -i 's/SubScopeNameSet/SubScopeName.Set/g' compiler/**/*.ml*
```
... and reformat
Quite a few changes are included here, some of which have some extra
implications visible in the language:
- adds the `Scope of { -- input_v: value; ... }` construct in the language
- handle it down the pipeline:
* `ScopeCall` in the surface AST
* `EScopeCall` in desugared and scopelang
* expressions are now traversed to detect dependencies between scopes
* transformed into a normal function call in dcalc
- defining a scope now implicitely defines a structure with the same name, with
the output variables of the scope defined as fields. This allows us to type
the return value from a scope call and access its fields easily.
* the implications are mostly in surface/name_resolution.ml code-wise
* the `Scope_out` struct that was defined in scope_to_dcalc is no longer
needed/used and the fields are no longer renamed (changes some outputs; the
explicit suffix for variables with multiple states is ignored as well)
* one benefit is that disambiguation works just like for structures when there
are conflicts on field names
* however, it's now a conflict if a scope and a structure have the same
name (side-note: issues with conflicting enum / struct names or scope
variables / subscope names were silent and are now properly reported)
- you can consequently use scope names as types for variables as well. Writing
literals is not allowed though, they can only be obtained by calling the
scope.
Remaining TODOs:
- context variables are not handled properly at the moment
- error handling on invalid calls
- tests show a small error message regression; lots of examples will need
tweaking to avoid scope/struct name or struct fields / output variable
conflicts
- add a `->` syntax to make struct field access distinct from scope output var
access, enforced with typing. This is expected to reduce confusion of users
and add a little typing precision.
- document the new syntax & implications (tutorial, cheat-sheet)
- a consequence of the changes is that subscope variables also can now be typed.
A possible future evolution / simplification would be to rewrite subscopes as
explicit scope calls early in the pipeline. That could also allow to manipulate
them as expressions (bind them in let-ins, return them...)
This was the only reasonable solution I found to the issue raised
[here](https://github.com/CatalaLang/catala/pull/334#discussion_r987175884).
This was a pretty tedious rewrite, but it should now ensure we are doing things
correctly. As a bonus, the "smart" expression constructors are now used
everywhere to build expressions (so another refactoring like this one should be
much easier) and this makes the code overall feel more
straightforward (`Bindlib.box_apply` or `let+` no longer need to be visible!)
---
Basically, we were using values of type `gexpr box = naked_gexpr marked box`
throughout when (re-)building expressions. This was done 99% of the time by
using `Bindlib.box_apply add_mark naked_e` right after building `naked_e`. In
lots of places, we needed to recover the annotation of this expression later on,
typically to build its parent term (to inherit the position, or build the type).
Since it wasn't always possible to wrap these uses within `box_apply` (esp. as
bindlib boxes aren't a monad), here and there we had to call `Bindlib.unbox`,
just to recover the position or type. This had the very unpleasant effect of
forcing the resolution of the whole box (including applying any stored closures)
to reach the top-level annotation which isn't even dependant on specific
variable bindings. Then, generally, throwing away the result.
Therefore, the change proposed here transforms
- `naked_gexpr marked Bindlib.box` into
- `naked_gexpr Bindlib.box marked` (aliased to `boxed_gexpr` or `gexpr boxed` for
convenience)
This means only
1. not fitting the mark into the box right away when building, and
2. accessing the top-level mark directly without unboxing
The functions for building terms from module `Shared_ast.Expr` could be changed
easily. But then they needed to be consistently used throughout, without
manually building terms through `Bindlib.apply_box` -- which covers most of the
changes in this patch.
`Expr.Box.inj` is provided to swap back to a box, before binding for example.
Additionally, this gives a 40% speedup on `make -C examples pass_all_tests`,
which hints at the amount of unnecessary work we were doing --'
This moves dcalc/typing.ml to shared_ast, and generalises the input type, but
without yet implementing the extra cases (these are all `assert false`): it's
just a first step.
