Pass along a bindlib context to allow the variable names to be altered only when
disambiguation is needed. Partial fix to #240 (doesn't affect the backends, only
the printer for the intermediate ASTs).
This also has the benefit of making the output of the tests much more stable.
This is a workaround (but corresponds to what was executed before) and means
that we re-explore all exprs to look for free variables.
The proper fix will be to store boxed_exprs inside scopes instead.
This was the only reasonable solution I found to the issue raised
[here](https://github.com/CatalaLang/catala/pull/334#discussion_r987175884).
This was a pretty tedious rewrite, but it should now ensure we are doing things
correctly. As a bonus, the "smart" expression constructors are now used
everywhere to build expressions (so another refactoring like this one should be
much easier) and this makes the code overall feel more
straightforward (`Bindlib.box_apply` or `let+` no longer need to be visible!)
---
Basically, we were using values of type `gexpr box = naked_gexpr marked box`
throughout when (re-)building expressions. This was done 99% of the time by
using `Bindlib.box_apply add_mark naked_e` right after building `naked_e`. In
lots of places, we needed to recover the annotation of this expression later on,
typically to build its parent term (to inherit the position, or build the type).
Since it wasn't always possible to wrap these uses within `box_apply` (esp. as
bindlib boxes aren't a monad), here and there we had to call `Bindlib.unbox`,
just to recover the position or type. This had the very unpleasant effect of
forcing the resolution of the whole box (including applying any stored closures)
to reach the top-level annotation which isn't even dependant on specific
variable bindings. Then, generally, throwing away the result.
Therefore, the change proposed here transforms
- `naked_gexpr marked Bindlib.box` into
- `naked_gexpr Bindlib.box marked` (aliased to `boxed_gexpr` or `gexpr boxed` for
convenience)
This means only
1. not fitting the mark into the box right away when building, and
2. accessing the top-level mark directly without unboxing
The functions for building terms from module `Shared_ast.Expr` could be changed
easily. But then they needed to be consistently used throughout, without
manually building terms through `Bindlib.apply_box` -- which covers most of the
changes in this patch.
`Expr.Box.inj` is provided to swap back to a box, before binding for example.
Additionally, this gives a 40% speedup on `make -C examples pass_all_tests`,
which hints at the amount of unnecessary work we were doing --'
Note that this is incomplete in the case of desugared/scopelang because we only
have typing for expressions yet, and the scope/program structure is different.
The code allows passing an environment of types for scope/subscope variables in
order to resolve `ELocation` terms, but that's unused until we implement
scopelang typing at the scope level.
This moves dcalc/typing.ml to shared_ast, and generalises the input type, but
without yet implementing the extra cases (these are all `assert false`): it's
just a first step.
Also add some safeguards against bad propagation of types (e.g. checking the
arrow type of functions upon application); partly disabled at the moment since
they don't pass yet but that'll be further work.
This gives further uniformity in their interfaces and allows more common
handling.
The next step will be for all the `Expr.make_*` functions to work on expressions
annotated with the `'a mark` type, correctly propagating type information when
it is present. Then we could even imagine early propagation of type
information (without complete inference), which could for example be used for
overloaded operator disambiguation.
This will allow to unify with types used earlier in the
pipeline (`Scopelang.Ast.typ`).
It seems cleaner! But some areas may warrant a later clean-up, in particular
handling of options and their types in the backends, or possible name conflicts
of structs/enums with built-in types when printing.
Note that there were significant differences between the two printers (see the test diff!). Overall the `dcalc` one seemed newer so that's what I took, with only the required additions from `lcalc` (exceptions, raise and catch)
Handling code should now be reasonably well sorted between `Shared_ast.{Var,Expr,Scope,Program}`
The function parameters (e.g. `make_let_in`) could be removed from the
scope handling functions since now the types are compatible, which
makes them much easier to read.
