At least on Linux, \r needs to be in singles quotes as an argument to tr
or it removes all the 'r' instead! Hopefully it also works this way on
Windows...
There's a bit of a trade off here. It would be better to report the
ambiguity but this would lead to a need for (I think) excessive
precision in types which would impact usability. It will always take the
leftmost interface.
Chapter 7 tests added.
Idris 1 will fill in the last metavariables by matching rather than
unification, as a convenience. I still think this is okay, even if it's
a bit hacky, because it's a huge convenience and doesn't affect other
unification problems.
Also abstract over lets in guesses, like in delayed elaborators, to
avoid any difficulties when linearity checking and to make sure that let
bound things don't get reevaluated.
This is enough to get the Chapter 6 TypeDD tests working
This was left over from Blodwen (where it was also wrong :)) but the way
we apply metavariables now means we don't need to do anything fancy when
unelaborating them for pretty printing.
Need to add by full name, due to ordering of loading (the name it's
attached to may not be resolved yet!). This doesn't seem to cause any
performance problems but we can revisit if it does.
Small change needed to fix one - assume given implicits which are of the
form x@_ arise from types. It's a bit of a hack but I don't think
there's any need for anything more complicated.
Only valid if unifying the pattern at the end doesn't solve any
metavariables. Also when elaborating applications of fromInteger etc to
constants on the LHS we need to be in expression mode, then reduce the
result later.
This was a slight difference from Blodwen that wasn't accounted for -
there might be lets in the nested environment, so when building the
expanded application type, make sure we go under them
This wasn't necessary before, since we always inlined, but since we can
now postpone things longer and don't always inline until much later, we
need to know what names everything refers to earlier.
We can't refine by a name in Rig0 because we can't assume it covers all
possibilities, so only refine by them at the end, at which point we
check that there's only one case left (otherwise we have to match on it,
which is not allowed for an erased thing)
With the --yaffle flag, you get the old behaviour which is to invoke the
checker for the core theory (and all the tests are updated appropriately
for this).
This gives useful information for expression search, because we can add
lambdas while we're still building the environment, and start looking at
locals after that.
Mostly direct from Blodwen (some minor modifications to deal with new
way of going into a new scope in the elaborator as well as the usual
bits dealing with name lookup and Glued terms)
Like Idris 1, these are implicitly added on encountering a repeated name
or a non-constructor application. Unlike Idris 1 (and Blodwen) they are
checking by unification rather than matching (which means in particular
that function argument names can't be bound in dot patterns) which is
slightly less expressive, but better overall because matching is
potentially more error prone.
Slight change of plan: instead of having special names, add Lazy, Inf,
Delay and Force and keywords and elaborate them specially.
Correspondingly, add DelayCase for case trees. Given that implicit
laziness is important, it seems better to do it this way than constantly
check whether the name we're working with is important.
This turns out to make implicit laziness much easier, because the
unifier can flag whether it had to go under a 'Delayed' to succeed, and
report that back to the elaborator which can then insert the necessary
coercion.
This slows things down a bit because to find the holes and give them the
right multiplicities, we need to normalise all the arguments which might
have been metavariables. Maybe we should skip this if we're not using
anything linear, for efficiency?
As patterns are handled by deciding which side of the as is considered
'used'. In case blocks, that should be the variable name, but in general
it should be the pattern, so IAs now has a flag to say which one.
It's not quite there yet, though, because the treatment of 'as' patterns
isn't quite right and the slightly hacky approach we're taking might not
be the best. Rethinking now...
Works by running all possible elaborators and checking that exactly one
succeeds. Still to do: pruning the list of elaborators by target type,
dealing with 'UniqueDefault', checking that delaying on failure works as
it should.
When we encounter them, not that they're a binding as normal, but also
record the thing they expand to. Then bind as a PLet, and convert that
to a Let on the RHS so it has computational force. The case tree
compiler knows about as patterns, so they get compiled to use the
appropriate name on the rhs (rather than a let).
