## Description
We go through the module `Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.FromIr` and split it into separate self-contained units, which we document.
Note that this PR has a slightly opinionated follow-up PR #3909 .
### Related Issues
Fix#3666
### Solution and Design
The module `FromIr` has given rise to:
* `FromIr.Expression`
* `FromIr.Query`
* `FromIr.Delete`
* `FromIr.Insert`
* `FromIr.Update`
* `FromIr.SelectIntoTempTable`
And `Execute.MutationResponse` has become `FromIr.MutationResponse` (after some slight adaptation of types).
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3908
GitOrigin-RevId: 364acf1bcdf74f2e19464c31cdded12bd8e9aa59
I discovered and removed instances of Boolean Blindness about whether json numbers should be stringified or not.
Although quite far-reaching, this is a completely mechanical change and should have no observable impact outside the server code.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3763
GitOrigin-RevId: c588891afd8a6923a135c736f6581a43a2eddbc7
We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema.
Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects.
We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e46 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type:
```haskell
tableSelectionSet ::
forall b r m n.
MonadBuildSchema b r m n =>
SourceName ->
TableInfo b ->
SelPermInfo b ->
m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b))
```
There are three reasons to change this.
1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125.
2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read.
3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068.
Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter.
One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role.
So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
This PR pretty much does the same thing to remote relationship types in schemacache as what #2979 did to remote relationship types in the IR. On main remote relationships are represented by types of form `T from to`. This PR changes it to `T from` which makes it a lot more reusable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3037
GitOrigin-RevId: 90a5c9e2346c8dc2da6ec5b8c970d6c863d2afb8
This PR simplifies the types that represent a remote relationship in IR so that they can be reused in other parts (in remote schema types) which could have remote relationships.
The comments on the PR explain the main changes.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2979
GitOrigin-RevId: 559c51d9d6ae79e2183ce4347018741b9096ac74
GraphQL types can refer to each other in a circular way. The PDV framework used to use values of type `Unique` to recognize two fragments of GraphQL schema as being the same instance. Internally, this is based on `Data.Unique` from the `base` package, which simply increases a counter on every creation of a `Unique` object.
**NB**: The `Unique` values are _not_ used for knot tying the schema combinators themselves (i.e. `Parser`s). The knot tying for `Parser`s is purely based on keys provided to `memoizeOn`. The `Unique` values are _only_ used to recognize two pieces of GraphQL _schema_ as being identical. Originally, the idea was that this would help us with a perfectly correct identification of GraphQL types. But this fully correct equality checking of GraphQL types was never implemented, and does not seem to be necessary to prevent bugs.
Specifically, these `Unique` values are stored as part of `data Definition a`, which specifies a part of our internal abstract syntax tree for the GraphQL types that we expose. The `Unique` values get initialized by the `SchemaT` effect.
In #2894 and #2895, we are experimenting with how (parts of) the GraphQL types can be hidden behind certain permission predicates. This would allow a single GraphQL schema in memory to serve all roles, implementing #2711. The permission predicates get evaluated at query parsing time when we know what role is doing a certain request, thus outputting the correct GraphQL types for that role.
If the approach of #2895 is followed, then the `Definition` objects, and thus the `Unique` values, would be hidden behind the permission predicates. Since the permission predicates are evaluated only after the schema is already supposed to be built, this means that the permission predicates would prevent us from initializing the `Unique` values, rendering them useless.
The simplest remedy to this is to remove our usage of `Unique` altogether from the GraphQL schema and schema combinators. It doesn't serve a functional purpose, doesn't prevent bugs, and requires extra bookkeeping.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2980
GitOrigin-RevId: 50d3f9e0b9fbf578ac49c8fc773ba64a94b1f43d
Source typename customization (hasura/graphql-engine@aac64f2c81) introduced a mechanism to change certain names in the GraphQL schema that is exposed. In particular it allows last-minute modification of:
1. the names of some types, and
2. the names of some root fields.
The above two items are assigned distinct customization algorithms, and at times both algorithms are in scope. So a need to distinguish them is needed.
In the original design, this was addressed by introducing a newtype wrapper `Typename` around GraphQL `Name`s, dedicated to the names of types. However, in the majority of the codebase, type names are also represented by `Name`. For this reason, it was unavoidable to allow for easy conversion. This was supported by a `HasName Typename` instance, as well as by publishing the constructors of `Typename`.
This means that the type safety that newtypes can add is lost. In particular, it is now very easy to confuse type name customization with root field name customization.
This refactors the above design by instead introducing newtypes around the customization operations:
```haskell
newtype MkTypename = MkTypename {runMkTypename :: Name -> Name}
deriving (Semigroup, Monoid) via (Endo Name)
newtype MkRootFieldName = MkRootFieldName {runMkRootFieldName :: Name -> Name}
deriving (Semigroup, Monoid) via (Endo Name)
```
The `Monoid` instance allows easy composition of customization operations, piggybacking off of the type of `Endo`maps.
This design allows safe co-existence of the two customization algorithms, while avoiding the syntactic overhead of packing and unpacking newtypes.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2989
GitOrigin-RevId: da3a353a9b003ee40c8d0a1e02872e99d2edd3ca
We'll see if this improves compile times at all, but I think it's worth
doing as at least the most minimal form of module documentation.
This was accomplished by first compiling everything with
-ddump-minimal-imports, and then a bunch of scripting (with help from
ormolu)
**EDIT** it doesn't seem to improve CI compile times but the noise floor is high as it looks like we're not caching library dependencies anymore
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2730
GitOrigin-RevId: 667eb8de1e0f1af70420cbec90402922b8b84cb4
<!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ -->
## Description
<!-- Please fill thier. -->
<!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective -->
We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata.
This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by
-> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown
-> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any
-> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check
### Related Issues
<!-- Please make surt title -->
<!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) -->
Close#1853
### Solution and Design
<!-- How is this iss -->
<!-- It's better if we elaborate -->
The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend.
### Steps to test and verify
<!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? -->
- Create author - article tables and track them
- Defined object and array relationships
- Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false`
- The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception
## Changelog
- ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR.
If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
## Affected components
<!-- Remove non-affected components from the list -->
- ✅ Server
- ❎ Console
- ❎ CLI
- ❎ Docs
- ❎ Community Content
- ❎ Build System
- ✅ Tests
- ❎ Other (list it)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636
GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
>
### Description
>
Insert mutations for MSSQL backend. This PR implements execution logic.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [x] Tests
### Related Issues
->
Close https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/2114
### Steps to test and verify
>
Track a MSSQL table and perform the generated insert mutation to test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2248
Co-authored-by: Abby Sassel <3883855+sassela@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Lykke Carlsen <358550+plcplc@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 936f138c80d7a928180e6e7b0c4da64ecc1f7ebc
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.
For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.
$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^ # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404
GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
>
### Description
>
While adding [insert mutation schema parser for MSSQL backend](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2141) I also included [identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_column) notion to table columns across all backends. In MSSQL we cannot insert any value (even `DEFAULT` expression) into Identity columns. This behavior of identity columns is not same in Postgres as we can insert values. This PR drops the notion of identity in the column info. The context of identity columns for MSSQL is carried in `ExtraTableMetadata` type.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [ ] Console
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Community Content
- [ ] Build System
- [x] Tests
- [ ] Other (list it)
### Related Issues
->
Fix https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7557https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2378
GitOrigin-RevId: c18b5708e2e6107423a0a95a7fc2e9721e8a21a1
