### Description
This PR adds the ability to perform remote joins from remote schemas in the engine. To do so, we alter the definition of an `ExecutionStep` targeting a remote schema: the `ExecStepRemote` constructor now expects a `Maybe RemoteJoins`. This new argument is used when processing the execution step, in the transport layer (either `Transport.HTTP` or `Transport.WebSocket`).
For this `Maybe RemoteJoins` to be extracted from a parsed query, this PR also extends the `Execute.RemoteJoin.Collect` module, to implement "collection" from a selection set. Not only do those new functions extract the remote joins, but they also apply all necessary transformations to the selection sets (such as inserting the necessary "phantom" fields used as join keys).
Finally in `Execute.RemoteJoin.Join`, we make two changes. First, we now always look for nested remote joins, regardless of whether the join we just performed went to a source or a remote schema; and second we adapt our join tree logic according to the special cases that were added to deal with remote server edge cases.
Additionally, this PR refactors / cleans / documents `Execute.RemoteJoin.RemoteServer`. This is not required as part of this change and could be moved to a separate PR if needed (a similar cleanup of `Join` is done independently in #3894). It also introduces a draft of a new documentation page for this project, that will be refined in the release PR that ships the feature (either #3069 or a copy of it).
While this PR extends the engine, it doesn't plug such relationships in the schema, meaning that, as of this PR, the new code paths in `Join` are technically unreachable. Adding the corresponding schema code and, ultimately, enabling the metadata API will be done in subsequent PRs.
### Keeping track of concrete type names
The main change this PR makes to the existing `Join` code is to handle a new reserved field we sometimes use when targeting remote servers: the `__hasura_internal_typename` field. In short, a GraphQL selection set can sometimes "branch" based on the concrete "runtime type" of the object on which the selection happens:
```graphql
query {
author(id: 53478) {
... on Writer {
name
articles {
title
}
}
... on Artist {
name
articles {
title
}
}
}
}
```
If both of those `articles` are remote joins, we need to be able, when we get the answer, to differentiate between the two different cases. We do this by asking for `__typename`, to be able to decide if we're in the `Writer` or the `Artist` branch of the query.
To avoid further processing / customization of results, we only insert this `__hasura_internal_typename: __typename` field in the query in the case of unions of interfaces AND if we have the guarantee that we will processing the request as part of the remote joins "folding": that is, if there's any remote join in this branch in the tree. Otherwise, we don't insert the field, and we leave that part of the response untouched.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3810
GitOrigin-RevId: 89aaf16274d68e26ad3730b80c2d2fdc2896b96c
…rmance
It makes sense to try to utilize multiple threads for metadata
operations since we expect them to come one at a time (and likely at
lower load periods anyway).
As noted, although we build roles in parallel now, the admin role is
still a bottleneck. For replace_metadata on huge_schema, on my machine
I get:
BEFORE: 22.7 sec
AFTER: 13.5 sec
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3911
GitOrigin-RevId: 4d4ee6ac8b5506603e70e4fc666a3aacc054d493
Fixes#3364.
This removes code that's only there to collect some metrics that were apparently never collected in production anyway, as confirmed by this slack discussion: https://hasurahq.slack.com/archives/CTRL7L1PZ/p1645547435034329
> We don't ever ingest these statsd metrics to lux, nor on HC AFAIK.
We're keeping the command line options for the moment to allow lux time to stop passing them.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3365
GitOrigin-RevId: bc6aa2c18a7d3eb0779ed17494662df5b7b54a76
They're tied to old-style cabal, and graphql-engine doesn't build with
those anymore anyhow.
Also removes a cabal.project Cabal version constraint related to Setup.hs.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3847
GitOrigin-RevId: 715e836cd2ddf7982143ba0ab8821f87a5eac0b1
### Description
Several libraries define `catMaybes` as `mapMaybe id`. We had it defined in `Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended` already. This small PR also defines it in `Extended` modules for other containers and replaces every occurrence of `mapMaybe id` accordingly.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3884
GitOrigin-RevId: d222a2ca2f4eb9b725b20450a62a626d3886dbf4
In hasura/graphql-engine#5144, we noticed that having remote relationships in the schema is problematic for Relay. In particular, we don't support remote schemas in Relay at all, and because of this, remote relationships were also broken.
The fix was easy: when we're building the schema for Relay, whenever we encounter a remote relationship in our configuration, we simply skip building that field. The implementation was easy: (see hasura/graphql-engine#5145)
```diff
- SFRemoteRelationship info -> pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
+ SFRemoteRelationship info ->
+ -- https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/5144
+ if isRelay then [] else pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
```
A test case was added in that PR to prevent us from accidentally re-including remote relationships in the Relay schema. (However, it now looks like that test case does not function correctly.)
The above code was later refactored in #3037, making use of the `MaybeT` effect. However, this effect was not used correctly, so that the result of the check was ignored.
This fixes the code to use the `MaybeT` effect correctly.
CC @0x777 @rakeshkky
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3868
GitOrigin-RevId: e528303e01eacf60173cba1eec1898986cf12359
### Description
There were several places in the codebase where we would either implement a generic container, or express the need for one. This PR extracts / creates all relevant containers, and adapts the relevant parts of the code to make use of said new generic containers. More specifically, it introduces the following modules:
- `Data.Set.Extended`, for new functions on `Data.Set`
- `Data.HashMap.Strict.Multi`, for hash maps that accept multiple values
- `Data.HashMap.Strict.NonEmpty`, for hash maps that can never be constructed as empty
- `Data.Trie`, for a generic implementation of a prefix tree
This PR makes use of those new containers in the following parts of the code:
- `Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.RemoteJoin.Types`
- `Hasura.RQL.Types.Endpoint*`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3828
GitOrigin-RevId: e6c1b971bcb3f5ab66bc91d0fa4d0e9df7a0c6c6
The only purpose was enabling the developer API by default. I don't
think that justifies a flag and CPP usage.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3820
GitOrigin-RevId: 058c9a7b03e5e164ef88e35c42f50bae3c42b5b6
### Description
This PR is one further step towards remote joins from remote schemas. It introduces a custom partial AST to represent queries to remote schemas in the IR: we now need to augment what used to be a straightforward GraphQL AST with additional information for remote join fields.
This PR does the minimal amount of work to adjust the rest of the code accordingly, using `Void` in all places that expect a type representing remote relationships.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3794
GitOrigin-RevId: 33fc317731aace71f82ad158a1951ea93350d6cc
No logic in this PR, just tidying things up (renaming the backend from `Experimental` to `DataWrapper`).
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3779
GitOrigin-RevId: f11acf563ccd8b9f16bc23c5e92da392aa4cfb2c
## Description
This PR is in reference to #2449 (support IP blacklisting for multitenant)
*RFC Update: Add support for IPv6 blocking*
### Solution and Design
Using [http-client-restricted](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-client-restricted) package, we're creating the HTTP manager with restricting capabilities. The IPs can be supplied from the CLI arguments as `--ipv4BlocklistCidrs cidr1, cidr2...` or `--disableDefaultIPv4Blocklist` for a default IP list. The new manager will block all requests to the provided CIDRs.
We are extracting the error message string to show the end-user that given IP is blocked from being set as a webhook. There are 2 ways to extract the error message "connection to IP address is blocked". Given below are the responses from event trigger to a blocked IP for these implementations:
- 6d74fde316f61e246c861befcca5059d33972fa7 - We return the error message string as a HTTPErr(HOther) from `Hasura/Eventing/HTTP.hs`.
```
{
"data": {
"message": "blocked connection to private IP address "
},
"version": "2",
"type": "client_error"
}
```
- 88e17456345cbb449a5ecd4877c84c9f319dbc25 - We case match on HTTPExceptionContent for InternaException in `Hasura/HTTP.hs` and extract the error message string from it. (this is implemented as it handles all the cases where pro engine makes webhook requests)
```
{
"data": {
"message": {
"type": "http_exception",
"message": "blocked connection to private IP address ",
"request": {
"secure": false,
"path": "/webhook",
"responseTimeout": "ResponseTimeoutMicro 60000000",
"queryString": "",
"method": "POST",
"requestHeaders": {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"X-B3-ParentSpanId": "5ae6573edb2a6b36",
"X-B3-TraceId": "29ea7bd6de6ebb8f",
"X-B3-SpanId": "303137d9f1d4f341",
"User-Agent": "hasura-graphql-engine/cerebushttp-ip-blacklist-a793a0e41-dirty"
},
"host": "139.59.90.109",
"port": 8000
}
}
},
"version": "2",
"type": "client_error"
}
```
### Steps to test and verify
The restricted IPs can be used as webhooks in event triggers, and hasura will return an error message in reponse.
### Limitations, known bugs & workarounds
- The `http-client-restricted` has a needlessly complex interface, and puts effort into implementing proxy support which we don't want, so we've inlined a stripped down version.
- Performance constraint: As the blocking is checked for each request, if a long list of blocked CIDRs is supplied, iterating through all of them is not what we would prefer. Using trie is suggested to overcome this. (Added to RFC)
- Calls to Lux endpoints are inconsistent: We use either the http manager from the ProServeCtx which is unrestricted, or the http manager from the ServeCtx which is restricted (the latter through the instances for MonadMetadataApiAuthorization and UserAuthentication). (The failure scenario here would be: cloud sets PRO_ENDPOINT to something that resolves to an internal address, and then restricted requests to those endpoints fail, causing auth to fail on user requests. This is about HTTP requests to lux auth endpoints.)
## Changelog
- ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR.
## Affected components
- ✅ Server
- ✅ Tests
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3186
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 5bd2de2d028bc416b02c99e996c7bebce56fb1e7
