hledger/hledger-lib/Hledger/Data/Balancing.hs
Simon Michael 35c1c9b6a2 pkg: progress towards supporting GHC 9.2 and newer libs (#1774)
hledger-lib builds, hledger's deps don't (shakespeare).
2021-12-06 12:32:50 -10:00

987 lines
43 KiB
Haskell

{-|
Functions for ensuring transactions and journals are balanced.
-}
{-# LANGUAGE LambdaCase #-}
{-# LANGUAGE NamedFieldPuns #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
{-# LANGUAGE PackageImports #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
module Hledger.Data.Balancing
( -- * BalancingOpts
BalancingOpts(..)
, HasBalancingOpts(..)
, defbalancingopts
-- * transaction balancing
, isTransactionBalanced
, balanceTransaction
, balanceTransactionHelper
, annotateErrorWithTransaction
-- * journal balancing
, journalBalanceTransactions
, journalCheckBalanceAssertions
-- * tests
, tests_Balancing
)
where
import Control.Monad.Except (ExceptT(..), runExceptT, throwError)
import "extra" Control.Monad.Extra (whenM)
import Control.Monad.Reader as R
import Control.Monad.ST (ST, runST)
import Data.Array.ST (STArray, getElems, newListArray, writeArray)
import Data.Foldable (asum)
import Data.Function ((&))
import qualified Data.HashTable.Class as H (toList)
import qualified Data.HashTable.ST.Cuckoo as H
import Data.List (intercalate, partition, sortOn)
import Data.List.Extra (nubSort)
import Data.Maybe (fromJust, fromMaybe, isJust, isNothing, mapMaybe)
import qualified Data.Set as S
import qualified Data.Text as T
import Data.Time.Calendar (fromGregorian)
import qualified Data.Map as M
import Safe (headDef)
import Text.Printf (printf)
import Hledger.Utils
import Hledger.Data.Types
import Hledger.Data.AccountName (isAccountNamePrefixOf)
import Hledger.Data.Amount
import Hledger.Data.Dates (showDate)
import Hledger.Data.Journal
import Hledger.Data.Posting
import Hledger.Data.Transaction
data BalancingOpts = BalancingOpts
{ ignore_assertions_ :: Bool -- ^ Ignore balance assertions
, infer_transaction_prices_ :: Bool -- ^ Infer prices in unbalanced multicommodity amounts
, commodity_styles_ :: Maybe (M.Map CommoditySymbol AmountStyle) -- ^ commodity display styles
} deriving (Show)
defbalancingopts :: BalancingOpts
defbalancingopts = BalancingOpts
{ ignore_assertions_ = False
, infer_transaction_prices_ = True
, commodity_styles_ = Nothing
}
-- | Check that this transaction would appear balanced to a human when displayed.
-- On success, returns the empty list, otherwise one or more error messages.
--
-- In more detail:
-- For the real postings, and separately for the balanced virtual postings:
--
-- 1. Convert amounts to cost where possible
--
-- 2. When there are two or more non-zero amounts
-- (appearing non-zero when displayed, using the given display styles if provided),
-- are they a mix of positives and negatives ?
-- This is checked separately to give a clearer error message.
-- (Best effort; could be confused by postings with multicommodity amounts.)
--
-- 3. Does the amounts' sum appear non-zero when displayed ?
-- (using the given display styles if provided)
--
transactionCheckBalanced :: BalancingOpts -> Transaction -> [String]
transactionCheckBalanced BalancingOpts{commodity_styles_} t = errs
where
(rps, bvps) = foldr partitionPosting ([], []) $ tpostings t
where
partitionPosting p ~(l, r) = case ptype p of
RegularPosting -> (p:l, r)
BalancedVirtualPosting -> (l, p:r)
VirtualPosting -> (l, r)
-- check for mixed signs, detecting nonzeros at display precision
canonicalise = maybe id canonicaliseMixedAmount commodity_styles_
signsOk ps =
case filter (not.mixedAmountLooksZero) $ map (canonicalise.mixedAmountCost.pamount) ps of
nonzeros | length nonzeros >= 2
-> length (nubSort $ mapMaybe isNegativeMixedAmount nonzeros) > 1
_ -> True
(rsignsok, bvsignsok) = (signsOk rps, signsOk bvps)
-- check for zero sum, at display precision
(rsum, bvsum) = (sumPostings rps, sumPostings bvps)
(rsumcost, bvsumcost) = (mixedAmountCost rsum, mixedAmountCost bvsum)
(rsumdisplay, bvsumdisplay) = (canonicalise rsumcost, canonicalise bvsumcost)
(rsumok, bvsumok) = (mixedAmountLooksZero rsumdisplay, mixedAmountLooksZero bvsumdisplay)
-- generate error messages, showing amounts with their original precision
errs = filter (not.null) [rmsg, bvmsg]
where
rmsg
| rsumok = ""
| not rsignsok = "real postings all have the same sign"
| otherwise = "real postings' sum should be 0 but is: " ++ showMixedAmount rsumcost
bvmsg
| bvsumok = ""
| not bvsignsok = "balanced virtual postings all have the same sign"
| otherwise = "balanced virtual postings' sum should be 0 but is: " ++ showMixedAmount bvsumcost
-- | Legacy form of transactionCheckBalanced.
isTransactionBalanced :: BalancingOpts -> Transaction -> Bool
isTransactionBalanced bopts = null . transactionCheckBalanced bopts
-- | Balance this transaction, ensuring that its postings
-- (and its balanced virtual postings) sum to 0,
-- by inferring a missing amount or conversion price(s) if needed.
-- Or if balancing is not possible, because the amounts don't sum to 0 or
-- because there's more than one missing amount, return an error message.
--
-- Transactions with balance assignments can have more than one
-- missing amount; to balance those you should use the more powerful
-- journalBalanceTransactions.
--
-- The "sum to 0" test is done using commodity display precisions,
-- if provided, so that the result agrees with the numbers users can see.
--
balanceTransaction ::
BalancingOpts
-> Transaction
-> Either String Transaction
balanceTransaction bopts = fmap fst . balanceTransactionHelper bopts
-- | Helper used by balanceTransaction and balanceTransactionWithBalanceAssignmentAndCheckAssertionsB;
-- use one of those instead. It also returns a list of accounts
-- and amounts that were inferred.
balanceTransactionHelper ::
BalancingOpts
-> Transaction
-> Either String (Transaction, [(AccountName, MixedAmount)])
balanceTransactionHelper bopts t = do
(t', inferredamtsandaccts) <- inferBalancingAmount (fromMaybe M.empty $ commodity_styles_ bopts) $
if infer_transaction_prices_ bopts then inferBalancingPrices t else t
case transactionCheckBalanced bopts t' of
[] -> Right (txnTieKnot t', inferredamtsandaccts)
errs -> Left $ transactionBalanceError t' errs
-- | Generate a transaction balancing error message, given the transaction
-- and one or more suberror messages.
transactionBalanceError :: Transaction -> [String] -> String
transactionBalanceError t errs =
annotateErrorWithTransaction t $
intercalate "\n" $ "could not balance this transaction:" : errs
annotateErrorWithTransaction :: Transaction -> String -> String
annotateErrorWithTransaction t s =
unlines [ showSourcePosPair $ tsourcepos t, s
, T.unpack . T.stripEnd $ showTransaction t
]
-- | Infer up to one missing amount for this transactions's real postings, and
-- likewise for its balanced virtual postings, if needed; or return an error
-- message if we can't. Returns the updated transaction and any inferred posting amounts,
-- with the corresponding accounts, in order).
--
-- We can infer a missing amount when there are multiple postings and exactly
-- one of them is amountless. If the amounts had price(s) the inferred amount
-- have the same price(s), and will be converted to the price commodity.
inferBalancingAmount ::
M.Map CommoditySymbol AmountStyle -- ^ commodity display styles
-> Transaction
-> Either String (Transaction, [(AccountName, MixedAmount)])
inferBalancingAmount styles t@Transaction{tpostings=ps}
| length amountlessrealps > 1
= Left $ transactionBalanceError t
["can't have more than one real posting with no amount"
,"(remember to put two or more spaces between account and amount)"]
| length amountlessbvps > 1
= Left $ transactionBalanceError t
["can't have more than one balanced virtual posting with no amount"
,"(remember to put two or more spaces between account and amount)"]
| otherwise
= let psandinferredamts = map inferamount ps
inferredacctsandamts = [(paccount p, amt) | (p, Just amt) <- psandinferredamts]
in Right (t{tpostings=map fst psandinferredamts}, inferredacctsandamts)
where
(amountfulrealps, amountlessrealps) = partition hasAmount (realPostings t)
realsum = sumPostings amountfulrealps
(amountfulbvps, amountlessbvps) = partition hasAmount (balancedVirtualPostings t)
bvsum = sumPostings amountfulbvps
inferamount :: Posting -> (Posting, Maybe MixedAmount)
inferamount p =
let
minferredamt = case ptype p of
RegularPosting | not (hasAmount p) -> Just realsum
BalancedVirtualPosting | not (hasAmount p) -> Just bvsum
_ -> Nothing
in
case minferredamt of
Nothing -> (p, Nothing)
Just a -> (p{pamount=a', poriginal=Just $ originalPosting p}, Just a')
where
-- Inferred amounts are converted to cost.
-- Also ensure the new amount has the standard style for its commodity
-- (since the main amount styling pass happened before this balancing pass);
a' = styleMixedAmount styles . mixedAmountCost $ maNegate a
-- | Infer prices for this transaction's posting amounts, if needed to make
-- the postings balance, and if possible. This is done once for the real
-- postings and again (separately) for the balanced virtual postings. When
-- it's not possible, the transaction is left unchanged.
--
-- The simplest example is a transaction with two postings, each in a
-- different commodity, with no prices specified. In this case we'll add a
-- price to the first posting such that it can be converted to the commodity
-- of the second posting (with -B), and such that the postings balance.
--
-- In general, we can infer a conversion price when the sum of posting amounts
-- contains exactly two different commodities and no explicit prices. Also
-- all postings are expected to contain an explicit amount (no missing
-- amounts) in a single commodity. Otherwise no price inferring is attempted.
--
-- The transaction itself could contain more than two commodities, and/or
-- prices, if they cancel out; what matters is that the sum of posting amounts
-- contains exactly two commodities and zero prices.
--
-- There can also be more than two postings in either of the commodities.
--
-- We want to avoid excessive display of digits when the calculated price is
-- an irrational number, while hopefully also ensuring the displayed numbers
-- make sense if the user does a manual calculation. This is (mostly) achieved
-- in two ways:
--
-- - when there is only one posting in the "from" commodity, a total price
-- (@@) is used, and all available decimal digits are shown
--
-- - otherwise, a suitable averaged unit price (@) is applied to the relevant
-- postings, with display precision equal to the summed display precisions
-- of the two commodities being converted between, or 2, whichever is larger.
--
-- (We don't always calculate a good-looking display precision for unit prices
-- when the commodity display precisions are low, eg when a journal doesn't
-- use any decimal places. The minimum of 2 helps make the prices shown by the
-- print command a bit less surprising in this case. Could do better.)
--
inferBalancingPrices :: Transaction -> Transaction
inferBalancingPrices t@Transaction{tpostings=ps} = t{tpostings=ps'}
where
ps' = map (priceInferrerFor t BalancedVirtualPosting . priceInferrerFor t RegularPosting) ps
-- | Generate a posting update function which assigns a suitable balancing
-- price to the posting, if and as appropriate for the given transaction and
-- posting type (real or balanced virtual). If we cannot or should not infer
-- prices, just act as the identity on postings.
priceInferrerFor :: Transaction -> PostingType -> (Posting -> Posting)
priceInferrerFor t pt = maybe id inferprice inferFromAndTo
where
postings = filter ((==pt).ptype) $ tpostings t
pcommodities = map acommodity $ concatMap (amounts . pamount) postings
sumamounts = amounts $ sumPostings postings -- amounts normalises to one amount per commodity & price
-- We can infer prices if there are no prices given, exactly two commodities in the normalised
-- sum of postings in this transaction, and these two have opposite signs. The amount we are
-- converting from is the first commodity to appear in the ordered list of postings, and the
-- commodity we are converting to is the other. If we cannot infer prices, return Nothing.
inferFromAndTo = case sumamounts of
[a,b] | noprices, oppositesigns -> asum $ map orderIfMatches pcommodities
where
noprices = all (isNothing . aprice) sumamounts
oppositesigns = signum (aquantity a) /= signum (aquantity b)
orderIfMatches x | x == acommodity a = Just (a,b)
| x == acommodity b = Just (b,a)
| otherwise = Nothing
_ -> Nothing
-- For each posting, if the posting type matches, there is only a single amount in the posting,
-- and the commodity of the amount matches the amount we're converting from,
-- then set its price based on the ratio between fromamount and toamount.
inferprice (fromamount, toamount) posting
| [a] <- amounts (pamount posting), ptype posting == pt, acommodity a == acommodity fromamount
= posting{ pamount = mixedAmount a{aprice=Just conversionprice}
, poriginal = Just $ originalPosting posting }
| otherwise = posting
where
-- If only one Amount in the posting list matches fromamount we can use TotalPrice.
-- Otherwise divide the conversion equally among the Amounts by using a unit price.
conversionprice = case filter (== acommodity fromamount) pcommodities of
[_] -> TotalPrice $ negate toamount
_ -> UnitPrice $ negate unitprice `withPrecision` unitprecision
unitprice = aquantity fromamount `divideAmount` toamount
unitprecision = case (asprecision $ astyle fromamount, asprecision $ astyle toamount) of
(Precision a, Precision b) -> Precision . max 2 $ saturatedAdd a b
_ -> NaturalPrecision
saturatedAdd a b = if maxBound - a < b then maxBound else a + b
-- | Check any balance assertions in the journal and return an error message
-- if any of them fail (or if the transaction balancing they require fails).
journalCheckBalanceAssertions :: Journal -> Maybe String
journalCheckBalanceAssertions = either Just (const Nothing) . journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts
-- "Transaction balancing", including: inferring missing amounts,
-- applying balance assignments, checking transaction balancedness,
-- checking balance assertions, respecting posting dates. These things
-- are all interdependent.
-- WARN tricky algorithm and code ahead.
--
-- Code overview as of 20190219, this could/should be simplified/documented more:
-- parseAndFinaliseJournal['] (Cli/Utils.hs), journalAddForecast (Common.hs), journalAddBudgetGoalTransactions (BudgetReport.hs), tests (BalanceReport.hs)
-- journalBalanceTransactions
-- runST
-- runExceptT
-- balanceTransaction (Transaction.hs)
-- balanceTransactionHelper
-- runReaderT
-- balanceTransactionAndCheckAssertionsB
-- addAmountAndCheckAssertionB
-- addOrAssignAmountAndCheckAssertionB
-- balanceTransactionHelper (Transaction.hs)
-- uiCheckBalanceAssertions d ui@UIState{aopts=UIOpts{cliopts_=copts}, ajournal=j} (ErrorScreen.hs)
-- journalCheckBalanceAssertions
-- journalBalanceTransactions
-- transactionWizard, postingsBalanced (Add.hs), tests (Transaction.hs)
-- balanceTransaction (Transaction.hs) XXX hledger add won't allow balance assignments + missing amount ?
-- | Monad used for statefully balancing/amount-inferring/assertion-checking
-- a sequence of transactions.
-- Perhaps can be simplified, or would a different ordering of layers make sense ?
-- If you see a way, let us know.
type Balancing s = ReaderT (BalancingState s) (ExceptT String (ST s))
-- | The state used while balancing a sequence of transactions.
data BalancingState s = BalancingState {
-- read only
bsStyles :: Maybe (M.Map CommoditySymbol AmountStyle) -- ^ commodity display styles
,bsUnassignable :: S.Set AccountName -- ^ accounts in which balance assignments may not be used
,bsAssrt :: Bool -- ^ whether to check balance assertions
-- mutable
,bsBalances :: H.HashTable s AccountName MixedAmount -- ^ running account balances, initially empty
,bsTransactions :: STArray s Integer Transaction -- ^ a mutable array of the transactions being balanced
-- (for efficiency ? journalBalanceTransactions says: not strictly necessary but avoids a sort at the end I think)
}
-- | Access the current balancing state, and possibly modify the mutable bits,
-- lifting through the Except and Reader layers into the Balancing monad.
withRunningBalance :: (BalancingState s -> ST s a) -> Balancing s a
withRunningBalance f = ask >>= lift . lift . f
-- | Get this account's current exclusive running balance.
getRunningBalanceB :: AccountName -> Balancing s MixedAmount
getRunningBalanceB acc = withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsBalances} -> do
fromMaybe nullmixedamt <$> H.lookup bsBalances acc
-- | Add this amount to this account's exclusive running balance.
-- Returns the new running balance.
addToRunningBalanceB :: AccountName -> MixedAmount -> Balancing s MixedAmount
addToRunningBalanceB acc amt = withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsBalances} -> do
old <- fromMaybe nullmixedamt <$> H.lookup bsBalances acc
let new = maPlus old amt
H.insert bsBalances acc new
return new
-- | Set this account's exclusive running balance to this amount.
-- Returns the change in exclusive running balance.
setRunningBalanceB :: AccountName -> MixedAmount -> Balancing s MixedAmount
setRunningBalanceB acc amt = withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsBalances} -> do
old <- fromMaybe nullmixedamt <$> H.lookup bsBalances acc
H.insert bsBalances acc amt
return $ maMinus amt old
-- | Set this account's exclusive running balance to whatever amount
-- makes its *inclusive* running balance (the sum of exclusive running
-- balances of this account and any subaccounts) be the given amount.
-- Returns the change in exclusive running balance.
setInclusiveRunningBalanceB :: AccountName -> MixedAmount -> Balancing s MixedAmount
setInclusiveRunningBalanceB acc newibal = withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsBalances} -> do
oldebal <- fromMaybe nullmixedamt <$> H.lookup bsBalances acc
allebals <- H.toList bsBalances
let subsibal = -- sum of any subaccounts' running balances
maSum . map snd $ filter ((acc `isAccountNamePrefixOf`).fst) allebals
let newebal = maMinus newibal subsibal
H.insert bsBalances acc newebal
return $ maMinus newebal oldebal
-- | Update (overwrite) this transaction in the balancing state.
updateTransactionB :: Transaction -> Balancing s ()
updateTransactionB t = withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsTransactions} ->
void $ writeArray bsTransactions (tindex t) t
-- | Infer any missing amounts (to satisfy balance assignments and
-- to balance transactions) and check that all transactions balance
-- and (optional) all balance assertions pass. Or return an error message
-- (just the first error encountered).
--
-- Assumes journalInferCommodityStyles has been called, since those
-- affect transaction balancing.
--
-- This does multiple things at once because amount inferring, balance
-- assignments, balance assertions and posting dates are interdependent.
journalBalanceTransactions :: BalancingOpts -> Journal -> Either String Journal
journalBalanceTransactions bopts' j' =
let
-- ensure transactions are numbered, so we can store them by number
j@Journal{jtxns=ts} = journalNumberTransactions j'
-- display precisions used in balanced checking
styles = Just $ journalCommodityStyles j
bopts = bopts'{commodity_styles_=styles}
-- balance assignments will not be allowed on these
txnmodifieraccts = S.fromList . map (paccount . tmprPosting) . concatMap tmpostingrules $ jtxnmodifiers j
in
runST $ do
-- We'll update a mutable array of transactions as we balance them,
-- not strictly necessary but avoids a sort at the end I think.
balancedtxns <- newListArray (1, toInteger $ length ts) ts
-- Infer missing posting amounts, check transactions are balanced,
-- and check balance assertions. This is done in two passes:
runExceptT $ do
-- 1. Step through the transactions, balancing the ones which don't have balance assignments
-- and leaving the others for later. The balanced ones are split into their postings.
-- The postings and not-yet-balanced transactions remain in the same relative order.
psandts :: [Either Posting Transaction] <- fmap concat $ forM ts $ \case
t | null $ assignmentPostings t -> case balanceTransaction bopts t of
Left e -> throwError e
Right t' -> do
lift $ writeArray balancedtxns (tindex t') t'
return $ map Left $ tpostings t'
t -> return [Right t]
-- 2. Sort these items by date, preserving the order of same-day items,
-- and step through them while keeping running account balances,
runningbals <- lift $ H.newSized (length $ journalAccountNamesUsed j)
flip runReaderT (BalancingState styles txnmodifieraccts (not $ ignore_assertions_ bopts) runningbals balancedtxns) $ do
-- performing balance assignments in, and balancing, the remaining transactions,
-- and checking balance assertions as each posting is processed.
void $ mapM' balanceTransactionAndCheckAssertionsB $ sortOn (either postingDate tdate) psandts
ts' <- lift $ getElems balancedtxns
return j{jtxns=ts'}
-- | This function is called statefully on each of a date-ordered sequence of
-- 1. fully explicit postings from already-balanced transactions and
-- 2. not-yet-balanced transactions containing balance assignments.
-- It executes balance assignments and finishes balancing the transactions,
-- and checks balance assertions on each posting as it goes.
-- An error will be thrown if a transaction can't be balanced
-- or if an illegal balance assignment is found (cf checkIllegalBalanceAssignment).
-- Transaction prices are removed, which helps eg balance-assertions.test: 15. Mix different commodities and assignments.
-- This stores the balanced transactions in case 2 but not in case 1.
balanceTransactionAndCheckAssertionsB :: Either Posting Transaction -> Balancing s ()
balanceTransactionAndCheckAssertionsB (Left p@Posting{}) =
-- update the account's running balance and check the balance assertion if any
void . addAmountAndCheckAssertionB $ postingStripPrices p
balanceTransactionAndCheckAssertionsB (Right t@Transaction{tpostings=ps}) = do
-- make sure we can handle the balance assignments
mapM_ checkIllegalBalanceAssignmentB ps
-- for each posting, infer its amount from the balance assignment if applicable,
-- update the account's running balance and check the balance assertion if any
ps' <- mapM (addOrAssignAmountAndCheckAssertionB . postingStripPrices) ps
-- infer any remaining missing amounts, and make sure the transaction is now fully balanced
styles <- R.reader bsStyles
case balanceTransactionHelper defbalancingopts{commodity_styles_=styles} t{tpostings=ps'} of
Left err -> throwError err
Right (t', inferredacctsandamts) -> do
-- for each amount just inferred, update the running balance
mapM_ (uncurry addToRunningBalanceB) inferredacctsandamts
-- and save the balanced transaction.
updateTransactionB t'
-- | If this posting has an explicit amount, add it to the account's running balance.
-- If it has a missing amount and a balance assignment, infer the amount from, and
-- reset the running balance to, the assigned balance.
-- If it has a missing amount and no balance assignment, leave it for later.
-- Then test the balance assertion if any.
addOrAssignAmountAndCheckAssertionB :: Posting -> Balancing s Posting
addOrAssignAmountAndCheckAssertionB p@Posting{paccount=acc, pamount=amt, pbalanceassertion=mba}
-- an explicit posting amount
| hasAmount p = do
newbal <- addToRunningBalanceB acc amt
whenM (R.reader bsAssrt) $ checkBalanceAssertionB p newbal
return p
-- no explicit posting amount, but there is a balance assignment
| Just BalanceAssertion{baamount,batotal,bainclusive} <- mba = do
newbal <- if batotal
-- a total balance assignment (==, all commodities)
then return $ mixedAmount baamount
-- a partial balance assignment (=, one commodity)
else do
oldbalothercommodities <- filterMixedAmount ((acommodity baamount /=) . acommodity) <$> getRunningBalanceB acc
return $ maAddAmount oldbalothercommodities baamount
diff <- (if bainclusive then setInclusiveRunningBalanceB else setRunningBalanceB) acc newbal
let p' = p{pamount=filterMixedAmount (not . amountIsZero) diff, poriginal=Just $ originalPosting p}
whenM (R.reader bsAssrt) $ checkBalanceAssertionB p' newbal
return p'
-- no explicit posting amount, no balance assignment
| otherwise = return p
-- | Add the posting's amount to its account's running balance, and
-- optionally check the posting's balance assertion if any.
-- The posting is expected to have an explicit amount (otherwise this does nothing).
-- Adding and checking balance assertions are tightly paired because we
-- need to see the balance as it stands after each individual posting.
addAmountAndCheckAssertionB :: Posting -> Balancing s Posting
addAmountAndCheckAssertionB p | hasAmount p = do
newbal <- addToRunningBalanceB (paccount p) $ pamount p
whenM (R.reader bsAssrt) $ checkBalanceAssertionB p newbal
return p
addAmountAndCheckAssertionB p = return p
-- | Check a posting's balance assertion against the given actual balance, and
-- return an error if the assertion is not satisfied.
-- If the assertion is partial, unasserted commodities in the actual balance
-- are ignored; if it is total, they will cause the assertion to fail.
checkBalanceAssertionB :: Posting -> MixedAmount -> Balancing s ()
checkBalanceAssertionB p@Posting{pbalanceassertion=Just (BalanceAssertion{baamount,batotal})} actualbal =
forM_ (baamount : otheramts) $ \amt -> checkBalanceAssertionOneCommodityB p amt actualbal
where
assertedcomm = acommodity baamount
otheramts | batotal = map (\a -> a{aquantity=0}) . amountsRaw
$ filterMixedAmount ((/=assertedcomm).acommodity) actualbal
| otherwise = []
checkBalanceAssertionB _ _ = return ()
-- | Does this (single commodity) expected balance match the amount of that
-- commodity in the given (multicommodity) actual balance ? If not, returns a
-- balance assertion failure message based on the provided posting. To match,
-- the amounts must be exactly equal (display precision is ignored here).
-- If the assertion is inclusive, the expected amount is compared with the account's
-- subaccount-inclusive balance; otherwise, with the subaccount-exclusive balance.
checkBalanceAssertionOneCommodityB :: Posting -> Amount -> MixedAmount -> Balancing s ()
checkBalanceAssertionOneCommodityB p@Posting{paccount=assertedacct} assertedamt actualbal = do
let isinclusive = maybe False bainclusive $ pbalanceassertion p
actualbal' <-
if isinclusive
then
-- sum the running balances of this account and any of its subaccounts seen so far
withRunningBalance $ \BalancingState{bsBalances} ->
H.foldM
(\ibal (acc, amt) -> return $
if assertedacct==acc || assertedacct `isAccountNamePrefixOf` acc then maPlus ibal amt else ibal)
nullmixedamt
bsBalances
else return actualbal
let
assertedcomm = acommodity assertedamt
actualbalincomm = headDef nullamt . amountsRaw . filterMixedAmountByCommodity assertedcomm $ actualbal'
pass =
aquantity
-- traceWith (("asserted:"++).showAmountDebug)
assertedamt ==
aquantity
-- traceWith (("actual:"++).showAmountDebug)
actualbalincomm
errmsg = printf (unlines
[ "balance assertion: %s",
"\nassertion details:",
"date: %s",
"account: %s%s",
"commodity: %s",
-- "display precision: %d",
"calculated: %s", -- (at display precision: %s)",
"asserted: %s", -- (at display precision: %s)",
"difference: %s"
])
(case ptransaction p of
Nothing -> "?" -- shouldn't happen
Just t -> printf "%s\ntransaction:\n%s"
(showSourcePos pos)
(textChomp $ showTransaction t)
:: String
where
pos = baposition $ fromJust $ pbalanceassertion p
)
(showDate $ postingDate p)
(T.unpack $ paccount p) -- XXX pack
(if isinclusive then " (and subs)" else "" :: String)
assertedcomm
-- (asprecision $ astyle actualbalincommodity) -- should be the standard display precision I think
(show $ aquantity actualbalincomm)
-- (showAmount actualbalincommodity)
(show $ aquantity assertedamt)
-- (showAmount assertedamt)
(show $ aquantity assertedamt - aquantity actualbalincomm)
unless pass $ throwError errmsg
-- | Throw an error if this posting is trying to do an illegal balance assignment.
checkIllegalBalanceAssignmentB :: Posting -> Balancing s ()
checkIllegalBalanceAssignmentB p = do
checkBalanceAssignmentPostingDateB p
checkBalanceAssignmentUnassignableAccountB p
-- XXX these should show position. annotateErrorWithTransaction t ?
-- | Throw an error if this posting is trying to do a balance assignment and
-- has a custom posting date (which makes amount inference too hard/impossible).
checkBalanceAssignmentPostingDateB :: Posting -> Balancing s ()
checkBalanceAssignmentPostingDateB p =
when (hasBalanceAssignment p && isJust (pdate p)) $
throwError . T.unpack $ T.unlines
["postings which are balance assignments may not have a custom date."
,"Please write the posting amount explicitly, or remove the posting date:"
,""
,maybe (T.unlines $ showPostingLines p) showTransaction $ ptransaction p
]
-- | Throw an error if this posting is trying to do a balance assignment and
-- the account does not allow balance assignments (eg because it is referenced
-- by a transaction modifier, which might generate additional postings to it).
checkBalanceAssignmentUnassignableAccountB :: Posting -> Balancing s ()
checkBalanceAssignmentUnassignableAccountB p = do
unassignable <- R.asks bsUnassignable
when (hasBalanceAssignment p && paccount p `S.member` unassignable) $
throwError . T.unpack $ T.unlines
["balance assignments cannot be used with accounts which are"
,"posted to by transaction modifier rules (auto postings)."
,"Please write the posting amount explicitly, or remove the rule."
,""
,"account: " <> paccount p
,""
,"transaction:"
,""
,maybe (T.unlines $ showPostingLines p) showTransaction $ ptransaction p
]
-- lenses
makeHledgerClassyLenses ''BalancingOpts
-- tests
tests_Balancing :: TestTree
tests_Balancing =
testGroup "Balancing" [
testCase "inferBalancingAmount" $ do
(fst <$> inferBalancingAmount M.empty nulltransaction) @?= Right nulltransaction
(fst <$> inferBalancingAmount M.empty nulltransaction{tpostings = ["a" `post` usd (-5), "b" `post` missingamt]}) @?=
Right nulltransaction{tpostings = ["a" `post` usd (-5), "b" `post` usd 5]}
(fst <$> inferBalancingAmount M.empty nulltransaction{tpostings = ["a" `post` usd (-5), "b" `post` (eur 3 @@ usd 4), "c" `post` missingamt]}) @?=
Right nulltransaction{tpostings = ["a" `post` usd (-5), "b" `post` (eur 3 @@ usd 4), "c" `post` usd 1]}
, testGroup "balanceTransaction" [
testCase "detect unbalanced entry, sign error" $
assertLeft
(balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2007 01 28)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"test"
""
[]
[posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1)}, posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1)}]))
,testCase "detect unbalanced entry, multiple missing amounts" $
assertLeft $
balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2007 01 28)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"test"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "a", pamount = missingmixedamt}
, posting {paccount = "b", pamount = missingmixedamt}
])
,testCase "one missing amount is inferred" $
(pamount . last . tpostings <$>
balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2007 01 28)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
""
""
[]
[posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1)}, posting {paccount = "b", pamount = missingmixedamt}])) @?=
Right (mixedAmount $ usd (-1))
,testCase "conversion price is inferred" $
(pamount . head . tpostings <$>
balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2007 01 28)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
""
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.35)}
, posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (eur (-1))}
])) @?=
Right (mixedAmount $ usd 1.35 @@ eur 1)
,testCase "balanceTransaction balances based on cost if there are unit prices" $
assertRight $
balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2011 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
""
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount $ usd 1 `at` eur 2}
, posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount $ usd (-2) `at` eur 1}
])
,testCase "balanceTransaction balances based on cost if there are total prices" $
assertRight $
balanceTransaction defbalancingopts
(Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2011 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
""
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount $ usd 1 @@ eur 1}
, posting {paccount = "a", pamount = mixedAmount $ usd (-2) @@ eur (-1)}
])
]
, testGroup "isTransactionBalanced" [
testCase "detect balanced" $
assertBool "" $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}
, posting {paccount = "c", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-1.00))}
]
,testCase "detect unbalanced" $
assertBool "" $
not $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}
, posting {paccount = "c", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-1.01))}
]
,testCase "detect unbalanced, one posting" $
assertBool "" $
not $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}]
,testCase "one zero posting is considered balanced for now" $
assertBool "" $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 0)}]
,testCase "virtual postings don't need to balance" $
assertBool "" $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}
, posting {paccount = "c", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-1.00))}
, posting {paccount = "d", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 100), ptype = VirtualPosting}
]
,testCase "balanced virtual postings need to balance among themselves" $
assertBool "" $
not $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}
, posting {paccount = "c", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-1.00))}
, posting {paccount = "d", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 100), ptype = BalancedVirtualPosting}
]
,testCase "balanced virtual postings need to balance among themselves (2)" $
assertBool "" $
isTransactionBalanced defbalancingopts $
Transaction
0
""
nullsourcepos
(fromGregorian 2009 01 01)
Nothing
Unmarked
""
"a"
""
[]
[ posting {paccount = "b", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 1.00)}
, posting {paccount = "c", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-1.00))}
, posting {paccount = "d", pamount = mixedAmount (usd 100), ptype = BalancedVirtualPosting}
, posting {paccount = "3", pamount = mixedAmount (usd (-100)), ptype = BalancedVirtualPosting}
]
]
,testGroup "journalBalanceTransactions" [
testCase "missing-amounts" $ do
let ej = journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts $ samplejournalMaybeExplicit False
assertRight ej
journalPostings <$> ej @?= Right (journalPostings samplejournal)
,testCase "balance-assignment" $ do
let ej = journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts $
--2019/01/01
-- (a) = 1
nulljournal{ jtxns = [
transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ vpost' "a" missingamt (balassert (num 1)) ]
]}
assertRight ej
case ej of Right j -> (jtxns j & head & tpostings & head & pamount & amountsRaw) @?= [num 1]
Left _ -> error' "balance-assignment test: shouldn't happen"
,testCase "same-day-1" $ do
assertRight $ journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts $
--2019/01/01
-- (a) = 1
--2019/01/01
-- (a) 1 = 2
nulljournal{ jtxns = [
transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ vpost' "a" missingamt (balassert (num 1)) ]
,transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ vpost' "a" (num 1) (balassert (num 2)) ]
]}
,testCase "same-day-2" $ do
assertRight $ journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts $
--2019/01/01
-- (a) 2 = 2
--2019/01/01
-- b 1
-- a
--2019/01/01
-- a 0 = 1
nulljournal{ jtxns = [
transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ vpost' "a" (num 2) (balassert (num 2)) ]
,transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [
post' "b" (num 1) Nothing
,post' "a" missingamt Nothing
]
,transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ post' "a" (num 0) (balassert (num 1)) ]
]}
,testCase "out-of-order" $ do
assertRight $ journalBalanceTransactions defbalancingopts $
--2019/1/2
-- (a) 1 = 2
--2019/1/1
-- (a) 1 = 1
nulljournal{ jtxns = [
transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 02) [ vpost' "a" (num 1) (balassert (num 2)) ]
,transaction (fromGregorian 2019 01 01) [ vpost' "a" (num 1) (balassert (num 1)) ]
]}
]
,testGroup "commodityStylesFromAmounts" $ [
-- Journal similar to the one on #1091:
-- 2019/09/24
-- (a) 1,000.00
--
-- 2019/09/26
-- (a) 1000,000
--
testCase "1091a" $ do
commodityStylesFromAmounts [
nullamt{aquantity=1000, astyle=AmountStyle L False (Precision 3) (Just ',') Nothing}
,nullamt{aquantity=1000, astyle=AmountStyle L False (Precision 2) (Just '.') (Just (DigitGroups ',' [3]))}
]
@?=
-- The commodity style should have period as decimal mark
-- and comma as digit group mark.
Right (M.fromList [
("", AmountStyle L False (Precision 3) (Just '.') (Just (DigitGroups ',' [3])))
])
-- same journal, entries in reverse order
,testCase "1091b" $ do
commodityStylesFromAmounts [
nullamt{aquantity=1000, astyle=AmountStyle L False (Precision 2) (Just '.') (Just (DigitGroups ',' [3]))}
,nullamt{aquantity=1000, astyle=AmountStyle L False (Precision 3) (Just ',') Nothing}
]
@?=
-- The commodity style should have period as decimal mark
-- and comma as digit group mark.
Right (M.fromList [
("", AmountStyle L False (Precision 3) (Just '.') (Just (DigitGroups ',' [3])))
])
]
]