### Description
(This PR is better reviewed commit by commit.)
This PR is an aggregation of small incremental changes to Pro's init:
- it deletes some dead code,
- it starts reorganizing the code of that file by sections, similar to OSS' init,
- it extracts and cleans up license key cache init (groups several blocks of code in one separate function)
- makes some changes to a service class to reduce the dependency on `_acAppStateRef`
This PR is a first step: our goal is to move the schema cache build _in_ the app monad, in order to achieve #8344. To do so, we will need to remove `_acAppStateRef` from Pro's `AppContext`. There are two different paths we can take from here, which is why i cut this PR here:
- the first would be to change the different instances we implement on `AppM` to take as an argument the parts of the schema cache they depend on, rather than reading them from `_acAppStateRef`; as of this PR, `MetricsConfig` is the only such field;
- the second would be to apply the same strategy we already used for the TLSAllowList, and use a `IORef` that can be updated after the schema cache is built; this change would have a smaller footprint, but introduces one new `IORef` per such field, which feels something we don't want to generalize
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8655
GitOrigin-RevId: 809697d460bdb5c83ef7d30a2e835f589bcd80a6
### Description
This PR removes `ServerConfigCtx` and `HasServerConfigCtx`. Instead, it favours different approaches:
- when the code was only using one field, it passes that field explicitly (usually `SQLGenCtx` or `CheckFeatureFlag`)
- when the code was using several fields, but in only one function, it inlines
- for the cache build, it introduces `CacheStaticConfig` and `CacheDynamicConfig`, which are subsets of `AppEnv` and `AppContext` respectively
The main goal of this is to help with the modularization of the engine: as `ServerConfigCtx` had fields whose types were imported from several unrelated parts of the engine, using it tied together parts of the engine that should not be aware of one another (such as tying together `Hasura.LogicalModel` and `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`).
The bulk of this PR is a change to the cache build, as a follow up to #8509: instead of giving the entire `ServerConfigCtx` as a incremental rule argument, we only give the new `CacheDynamicConfig` struct, which has fewer fields. The other required fields, that were coming from the `AppEnv`, are now given via the `HasCacheStaticConfig` constraint, which is a "subset" of `HasAppEnv`.
(Some further work could include moving `StringifyNumbers` out of `GraphQL.Schema.Options`, given how it is used all across the codebase, including in `RQL.DML`.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8513
GitOrigin-RevId: 818cbcd71494e3cd946b06adbb02ca328a8a298e
- Remove `MonadMetadataStorageQueryAPI` which was only implemented by a default implementation
- Introduce `TransT` which can be used to easily derive `lift`ing implementations for `MonadBlaBlaBla` classes
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8579
GitOrigin-RevId: 4f804fda7e2de5c9d75ee4df269f500ebd46b8c9
## Description
This PR is a incremental step towards achieving the goal of #8344. It is a less ambitious version of #8484.
This PR removes all references to `HasServerConfigCtx` from the cache build and removes `ServerConfigCtx` from `CacheBuildParams`, making `ServerConfigCtx` an argument being passed around manually instead. This has several benefits: by making it an arrow argument, we now properly integrate the fields that change over time in the dependency framework, as they should be, and we can clean up some of the top-level app code.
## Implementation
In practice, this PR introduces a `HasServerConfigCtx` instance for `CacheRWT`, the monad we use to build the cache, so we can retrieve the `ServerConfigCtx` in the implementation of `CacheRWM`. This contributes to reducing the amount of `HasServerConfigCtx` in the code: we can remove `SchemaUpdateT` altogether, and we can remove the `HasServerConfigCtx` instance of `Handler`. This makes `HasServerConfigCtx` almost **an implementation detail of the Metadata API**.
This first step is enough to achieve the goal of #8344: we can now build the schema cache in the app monad, since we no longer rely on `HasServerConfigCtx` to build it.
## Drawbacks
This PR does not attempt to remove the use of `ServerConfigCtx` itself in the schema cache build: doing so would make this PR much much bigger. Ideally, to avoid having all the static fields given as arrow-ish arguments to the cache, we could depend on `HasAppEnv` in the cache build, and use `AppContext` as an arrow argument. But making the cache build depend on the full `AppEnv` and `AppContext` creates a lot of circular imports; and since removing `ServerConfigCtx` itself isn't required to achieve #8344, this PR keeps it wholesale and defers cleaning it to a future PR.
A negative consequence of this is that we need an `Eq` instance on `ServerConfigCtx`, and that instance is inelegant.
## Future work
There are several further steps we can take in parallel after this is merged. First, again, we can make a new version of #8344, removing `CacheBuild`, FINALLY. As for `ServerConfigCtx`, we can split it / rename it to make ad-hoc structures. If it turns out that `ServerConfigCtx` is only ever used for the schema cache build, we could split it between `CacheBuildEnv` and `CacheBuildContext`, which will be subsets of `AppEnv` and `AppContext`, avoiding import loops.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8509
GitOrigin-RevId: 01b37cc3fd3490d6b117701e22fc4ac88b62b6b5
## Description
This PR does several different things that happen to overlap; the most important being:
- it removes `RunT`: it was redundant in places where we already had `Handler`, and only used in one other place, `SchemaUpdate`, for which a local `SchemaUpdateT` is more than enough;
- it reduces the number of places where we create a `ServerConfigCtx`, since now `HasServerConfigCtx` can be implemented directly by `SchemaUpdateT` and `Handler` based on the full `AppContext`;
- it drastically reduces the number of arguments we pass around in the app init code, by introducing `HasAppEnv`;
- it simplifies `HandlerCtx` to reduce duplication
In doing so, this changes paves the way towards removing `ServerConfigCtx`, since there are only very few places where we construct it: we can now introduce smaller classes than `HasServerConfigCtx`, that expose only a relevant subset of fields, and implement them where we now implement `HasServerConfigCtx`.
This PR is loosely based on ideas in #8337, that are no longer applicable due to the changes introduced in #8159. A challenge of this PR was the postgres tests, which were running in `PGMetadataStorageAppT CacheBuild` 🙀
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8392
GitOrigin-RevId: b90c1359066d20dbea329c87762ccdd1217b4d69
## Description
### I want to speak to the `Manager`
Oh boy. This PR is both fairly straightforward and overreaching, so let's break it down.
For most network access, we need a [`HTTP.Manager`](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-client-0.1.0.0/docs/Network-HTTP-Client-Manager.html). It is created only once, at the top level, when starting the engine, and is then threaded through the application to wherever we need to make a network call. As of main, the way we do this is not standardized: most of the GraphQL execution code passes it "manually" as a function argument throughout the code. We also have a custom monad constraint, `HasHttpManagerM`, that describes a monad's ability to provide a manager. And, finally, several parts of the code store the manager in some kind of argument structure, such as `RunT`'s `RunCtx`.
This PR's first goal is to harmonize all of this: we always create the manager at the root, and we already have it when we do our very first `runReaderT`. Wouldn't it make sense for the rest of the code to not manually pass it anywhere, to not store it anywhere, but to always rely on the current monad providing it? This is, in short, what this PR does: it implements a constraint on the base monads, so that they provide the manager, and removes most explicit passing from the code.
### First come, first served
One way this PR goes a tiny bit further than "just" doing the aforementioned harmonization is that it starts the process of implementing the "Services oriented architecture" roughly outlined in this [draft document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FAigqrST0juU1WcT4HIxJxe1iEBwTuBZodTaeUvsKqQ/edit?usp=sharing). Instead of using the existing `HasHTTPManagerM`, this PR revamps it into the `ProvidesNetwork` service.
The idea is, again, that we should make all "external" dependencies of the engine, all things that the core of the engine doesn't care about, a "service". This allows us to define clear APIs for features, to choose different implementations based on which version of the engine we're running, harmonizes our many scattered monadic constraints... Which is why this service is called "Network": we can refine it, moving forward, to be the constraint that defines how all network communication is to operate, instead of relying on disparate classes constraint or hardcoded decisions. A comment in the code clarifies this intent.
### Side-effects? In my Haskell?
This PR also unavoidably touches some other aspects of the codebase. One such example: it introduces `Hasura.App.AppContext`, named after `HasuraPro.Context.AppContext`: a name for the reader structure at the base level. It also transforms `Handler` from a type alias to a newtype, as `Handler` is where we actually enforce HTTP limits; but without `Handler` being a distinct type, any code path could simply do a `runExceptT $ runReader` and forget to enforce them.
(As a rule of thumb, i am starting to consider any straggling `runReaderT` or `runExceptT` as a code smell: we should not stack / unstack monads haphazardly, and every layer should be an opaque `newtype` with a corresponding run function.)
## Further work
In several places, i have left TODOs when i have encountered things that suggest that we should do further unrelated cleanups. I'll write down the follow-up steps, either in the aforementioned document or on slack. But, in short, at a glance, in approximate order, we could:
- delete `ExecutionCtx` as it is only a subset of `ServerCtx`, and remove one more `runReaderT` call
- delete `ServerConfigCtx` as it is only a subset of `ServerCtx`, and remove it from `RunCtx`
- remove `ServerCtx` from `HandlerCtx`, and make it part of `AppContext`, or even make it the `AppContext` altogether (since, at least for the OSS version, `AppContext` is there again only a subset)
- remove `CacheBuildParams` and `CacheBuild` altogether, as they're just a distinct stack that is a `ReaderT` on top of `IO` that contains, you guessed it, the same thing as `ServerCtx`
- move `RunT` out of `RQL.Types` and rename it, since after the previous cleanups **it only contains `UserInfo`**; it could be bundled with the authentication service, made a small implementation detail in `Hasura.Server.Auth`
- rename `PGMetadaStorageT` to something a bit more accurate, such as `App`, and enforce its IO base
This would significantly simply our complex stack. From there, or in parallel, we can start moving existing dependencies as Services. For the purpose of supporting read replicas entitlement, we could move `MonadResolveSource` to a `SourceResolver` service, as attempted in #7653, and transform `UserAuthenticationM` into a `Authentication` service.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/7736
GitOrigin-RevId: 68cce710eb9e7d752bda1ba0c49541d24df8209f
