There's some missing flexibility in how foreign specifiers can be used with
scheme that is addressed here with minimal changes to how scheme specifiers
are read. This opens up uses for users that they otherwise would have had
to modify the compiler's support files to accomplish.
Auxiliary functions introduced in elaboration (e.g., through case splits and with clauses) now
have the same totality annotation as the function they're defined in.
Moved auxiliary function `findSetTotal` into `Context.idr` since it's
now used by `ProcessDef.idr` too.
Added a totality requirement argument to `checkClause` so that the
with-clause case could propagate it to the functions it generates in
elaboration.
Sandwhich the rhs elaboration in pattern matches with code that sets
the global, default, totality requirement to the current one, and
restores the previous default afterwards. It's a bit of a hacky way to
do it, but I don't think we have a better alternative with the current
design.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the underlying representation of
namespaces rather than say what we mean (using `isSuffixOf` to mean
`isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementation when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This PR introduces a `Namespace` newtype containing a list of strings.
Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the exposed
interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
Until now namespaces were stored as (reversed) lists of strings.
It led to:
* confusing code where we work on the representation rather than say
what we mean (e.g. using `isSuffixOf` to mean `isParentOf`)
* potentially introducing errors by not respecting the invariant cf.
bug report #616 (but also name generation in the scheme backend
although that did not lead to bugs as it was self-consistent AFAICT)
* ad-hoc code to circumvent overlapping interface implementations when
showing / pretty-printing namespaces
This introduces a Namespace newtype containing non-empty lists of
strings. Nested namespaces are still stored in reverse order but the
exposed interface aims to support programming by saying what we mean
(`isParentOf`, `isApproximationOf`, `X <.> Y` computes to `X.Y`, etc.)
irrespective of the underlying representation.
All of these internal names are making the output fragile. This
cleanup should allow us to only have to update the golden file
when there is a genuinely interesting change.
- Added initial implementations for terms and values
- Error messages converted to pretty printer
- Colorization for error messages
- Color and console width option both as command line and repl command
As it was, it could break if the argument was repeated more than twice.
When checking dot patterns, we need to check that no further holes are
solved, and that the pattern variable doesn't unify with some other
pattern variable, but if it had already made progress (either for a good
or bad reason) we missed this. Fixes#536
As it was, there was significant backtracking for big expressions,
getting to the end, not finding a **, so having to try again for
application expressions. Fixes#532
This has involved quite a bit of reorganisation and some improvements in
resugaring so that the results look nice. In summary:
* Expression search now gives back a RawImp rather than a checked term,
which allows it to include case expressions
* Case with one pattern is resugared to a destructuring let
* Some name generation issues address in function generation
We look at intermediate results for local variables which are functions
that return a concrete type, or recursive calls that return a single
constructor type. In these cases, we:
* let bind the local variable/recursive call
* generate a new definition for the scope, as a 'case' function
When we recursively generate the definition, it's a bit more restricted
so as not to explode the search space. We only take the first result, we
only look one constructor deep, and we go right to left on variable
splitting so only deconstruct the name we've just added.
