print now shows zero posting amounts with their original commodity
symbol and the corresponding style (instead of stripping the symbol).
If an inferred amount has multiple zeroes in different commodities,
a posting is displayed for each of these.
Possible breaking changes:
showMixedAmountLinesB, showAmountB, showAmountPrice now preserve
commodityful zeroes when rendering. This is intended to improve print output,
but it seems possible it might also affect balance and register reports,
though our tests show no change in those.
Equity conversion postings and cost amounts were being matched up too
exactly, causing valid entries with redundant conversion postings and
costs to be rejected. Now the amounts are compared with the precision
(number of decimal places) used in the conversion posting's amount.
Eg, here the first posting's 209.60495 GEL cost is recognised as a
match for the third posting's -209.60 GEL, using the latter's two
digit precision:
2023-01-01
Assets -84.01 USD @ 2.495 GEL ; 209.60495 GEL
Equity:Conversion 84.01 USD
Equity:Conversion -209.60 GEL
Assets 209.60 GEL
The suggested sample balance assertion now uses the same commodity
symbol as in the failing posting (the first, if there are more than
one). Also the cleared mark has been removed.
hledger check recentassertions now reports the error at the first
posting that's more than 7 days later than the latest balance
assertion (rather than at the balance assertion). This is the thing
actually triggering the error, and it is more likely to be visible or
at least closer when you are working at the end of a journal file.
Since 1.29, we unconditionally run part of the --infer-cost logic to
identify redundant costs/equity postings. This was too strict, raising
an error whenever it could not find postings matching the equity
postings. Now we do this (and also the explicit --infer-costs
operation) as a best effort, leaving transactions unchanged if we
can't detect matching postings. This is consistent with
--infer-equity, --infer-market-prices, -B and -V.
Transaction balancing is supposed to balance costs, but these were
being stripped when calculating balance assignments, causing us to
wrongly reject this transaction when the last amount is left implicit,
unlike Ledger:
2023-01-01
Assets AAA -1.1 @@ CCC 2
Assets BBB -1.2 @@ CCC 3
Expenses:Fees CCC 0.2
Assets = CCC 4.9
I'm not sure why costs were being stripped. I seem to have added it
in 2019 (to Journal.balanceNoAssignmentTransactionB in 3b47b58ae),
but this bug seems to be present even before that.
CSV rules files can now be read directly, eg you have the option of
writing `hledger -f foo.csv.rules CMD`. By default this will read data
from foo.csv in the same directory. But you can also specify a
different data file with a new `source FILE` rule. This has some
convenience features:
- If the data file does not exist, it is treated as empty, not an
error.
- If FILE is a relative path, it is relative to the rules file's
directory. If it is just a file name with no path, it is relative
to ~/Downloads/.
- If FILE is a glob pattern, the most recently modified matched file
is used.
This helps remove some of the busywork of managing CSV downloads.
Most of your financial institutions's default CSV filenames are
different and can be recognised by a glob pattern. So you can put a
rule like `source Checking1*.csv` in foo-checking.csv.rules,
periodically download CSV from Foo's website accepting your browser's
defaults, and then run `hledger import checking.csv.rules` to import
any new transactions. The next time, if you have done no cleanup, your
browser will probably save it as something like Checking1-2.csv, and
hledger will still see that because of the * wild card. You can choose
whether to delete CSVs after import, or keep them for a while as
temporary backups, or archive them somewhere.
Inner empty lines were not being skipped automatically, contrary to
docs. Now all empty lines are skipped automatically, and the `skip`
rule is needed only for non-empty lines, as intended.
This may be a breaking change: it's possible that the `skip` count
might need to be adjusted in some CSV rules files.
This can be useful to override defaults in scripts.
These flags will now toggle when repeated on the command line:
--invert
--transpose
-r/--related
-%/--percent
-E/--empty
-N/--no-total
-T/--row-total
-A/--average
-S/--sort-amount
Since hledger 1.25, "every Nth day of month" period rules with N > 28
could be off by a couple of days if given certain forecast start dates.
Eg `~ every 31st day of month` with `--forecast='2023-03-30..'`.
Breaking change: previously timeclock descriptions could contain
semicolons. Now a semicolon in the description will end it and
start a comment (which may contain tags).
I found at least one user for whom this would be a breaking change
(they generate forecast txns, and have auto posting rules, but don't
want the latter applied to the former). I guess it's better to keep
things as they were for now: if you need auto postings on your
forecast txns you must use two flags, --forecast --auto.
When doing a type: match we now also check the original unaliased,
unpivoted posting, as when doing an acct: match. This is effectively
how things worked with the older account type detection in hledger <1.27.
Previously, similarity completely outweighed recency, so a
slightly-more-similar transaction would always be selected no matter
how old it was. Now similarity and recency are more balanced,
and it should produce the desired transaction more often.
There is also new debug output (at debug level 1) for
troubleshooting.
Boolean queries are now prefixed with an 'expr:' prefix, making them
completely separable from old queries and making the addition of them a
little more migration proof.
The tests are updated accordingly, changes made to the tests previously
are removed and extra cautious documentation is also removed.
This commit changes some of the functions in the Query module and
changes the overall way to parse queries. Instead of using the words''
split function, this commit starts to fully parse the query, as it's
seen as a type of expression.
AND, OR, NOT, and space operators can be used. The space operator
simulates the behaviour from before, leaving a minimal amount of tests
that need to be adjusted to comply to the new behaviour.
Eg, where previously -p 'monthly from 1/15' or -M -b 1/15 would always
adjust the report start date to 1/1,
unless you used the special -p 'every 15th day of month from 1/15' form,
now the start date will not be adjusted. (It is still adjusted if
the report date is not specified explicitly, eg inferred from the journal).
This keeps behaviour consistent between report periods and periodic transactions.
'in' period expressions, like 'in 2023-01', are a grey area; they
do specify a start date (2023-01-01), although they look a bit implicit.
So previously, -p 'weekly in 2023-01' would adjust the start date to
the preceding monday (2022-12-26), but now it will start exactly on
2023-01-01 (a sunday, which also causes ugly verbose column headings).
To ensure monday based weeks and simple report headings here,
you would have to explicitly specific a start date that is a monday,
eg -p 'weekly from 2022-12-26 to 2023-02'.
You can now write both @/@@ costs and corresponding equity conversion postings
in a transaction at any time, not just when using --infer-costs or --infer-equity.
hledger will recognise the redundancy and ignore it.
One thing has become more strict: hledger now requires conversion postings
to occur in adjacent pairs; an odd number of them is not allowed.
(Conversion postings are postings to accounts of type `V`/`Conversion`,
or named `equity:conversion`, `equity:trade`, `equity:trading`,
or subaccounts of these.)
And, --infer-costs now works in transactions with an implicit amount
(inferring costs from equity now happens after transaction balancing,
not before).
Previously, the accounts passed to account directives would be stripped
of their surrounding brackets, but the required behaviour is to have
account directives plain reject bracketed accounts. This change ensures
that accounts in account directives may not start with a bracket
character.
Currently an account name like "a:(aa)" will not have (aa) unbracketed.
However, this seems reasonable since the full name is unbracketed and
thus will not be confused with virtual or virtual-balanced posting.